How do you feel about the Sign of Peace?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angela77
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Or even dispensed with.
It’s called 'the Kiss of Peace" in the original Apostolic Mass, and no, it can’t be “dispensed with.” It is one of very few elements of the Mass that is the core that was given to us by the Apostles. Things have been added in later generations - the Creed, the readings from the New Testament, for example, but the Kiss (or sign) of Peace is part of the original that comes from the Apostles. It can be moved around, or reduced, but not taken out.
 
You are way more likely to catch something in the Holy Water, since wet hands transmit germs to your face a lot faster than dry hands.
There are two basic types of pathogens that make us ill, bacteria and virus. Bacteria can be on a coin, or dish, or a person. Virus need to be in a host to survive. They are like babies in the snow. Once they leave the host they don’t live long. We get colds from being sneezed on or from direct contact with a carrier. If a person has a cold and shakes your hand and you use that hand to eat a cracker, wiper your eye you get infected.

Hair is host to many organisms. If a priest or minister is putting his or her hand on the heads of non-communicants and then into the chalice it is most certainly a means of cold and flu transmission and other infection as well.

Hundreds of people drinking from the same cup wiped again and again with the same cloth is like everyone in the building licking each other’s lips.
 
I find this thread terribly sad. I might post again at a later time when my more scathing comments about why most of the posters are a big bunch of ninnies that take the peace of Christ for granted won’t get me booted from the site.
 
It’s called 'the Kiss of Peace" in the original Apostolic Mass, and no, it can’t be “dispensed with.” It is one of very few elements of the Mass that is the core that was given to us by the Apostles. Things have been added in later generations - the Creed, the readings from the New Testament, for example, but the Kiss (or sign) of Peace is part of the original that comes from the Apostles. It can be moved around, or reduced, but not taken out.
I believe it was the ordained ministers on the altar who do this, not the congregation. That is how it is in the Eastern Divine Liturgies. There is no sign of peace in any I atttend.

There was no sign of peace among laity in the tradtiional Latin Mass I grew up with.

How is it then that it is claimed to have been in the earliest Masses. I attend the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostum dating to about 300 AD. The congregation never does anything remotely like the sign of peace. If there are two priests they do it.

If this were given to us by the Apostles it was dispensed with.
 
There are two basic types of pathogens that make us ill, bacteria and virus. Bacteria can be on a coin, or dish, or a person. Virus need to be in a host to survive. They are like babies in the snow. Once they leave the host they don’t live long. We get colds from being sneezed on or from direct contact with a carrier. If a person has a cold and shakes your hand and you use that hand to eat a cracker, wiper your eye you get infected.

Hair is host to many organisms. If a priest or minister is putting his or her hand on the heads of non-communicants and then into the chalice it is most certainly a means of cold and flu transmission and other infection as well.

Hundreds of people drinking from the same cup wiped again and again with the same cloth is like everyone in the building licking each other’s lips.
The transmission of flu and colds doesn’t appear to be higher in Churches where there is communion in both species.

This modern penchant for trying to avoid germs has led to more and more virulent strains, and higher incidences asthma and respiratory problems than yeas ago. We are too clean. Cleanliness is next to godliness, but fastidiousness is next to madness!
 
I’ve never been all that wild about shaking hands with strangers either, but I use hand sanitizer before and after shaking hands. The hands are great for passing diseases.I could not begin to remember the number of times I have seen people cough into their right hands, sneeze into both, wipe their noses, pick at the dental work, or rub their eyes right before extending them to shake hands.

I wonder about this gesture anyway. If you try to look the person in the eye to make real contact, you will be surprised how many people are already looking away when they say the words.
 
While I certainly sympathise with the hygiene issue, I hate it when parishoners give half-hearted handshakes or wave (unless they’re far away or ill–but in the second case, why come to Mass?) even in the winter. It’s rude.

Your parish should keep hand sanitiser, or you should keep a bottle of it in your pocket during Mass.
What if the other person is ill? Obviously ill, coughing, wiping their dripping nose on their hands? And yet he still wants to grab your hand. I’ve seen it.
Good question. I’m not talking about this person (although you may be more likely to fall ill sitting next to him, than by touching his hand) but about healthy people within arm’s reach who don’t want to touch anybody’s hands once winter comes.
 
The sign of peace doesn’t necessitate the shaking of hands. There are other ways of offering the sign of peace, especially if one is sick and doesn’t think shaking hands is best. A polite bow or nod is just as good. If othe people don’t understand your actions, explain it to them. Really, the sign of peace is not that difficult to perform.
 
I have no issue with exchanging a sign of peace. A simple handshake with a few around me is sufficient. If I am with family at Mass which doesn’t happen often, most of them prefer a hug and/or handshake. If I am really ill with a nasty cold/flu, I will stay home from Mass to avoid spreading germs.
 
As Pope Benedict XVI wrote in his Encyclical, Spe Salvi, salvation was never individualistic, but communal.

The sign of peace is part of being part of the community in Christ.

We as a community unite ourselves to the Eucharist, not individually.

If Christ meant for the Eucharist to be solely for the individual, he would’ve told the apostles to teach the people to celebrate the Eucharist privately in their cells, as he taught about prayer when he gave us the “Our Father.”

Jim
 
I doubt many lepers would get kissed on this forum!:hug1:
A well-fed, ill-mannered ten year old boy wiping his snotty nose on his hands and wanting to shake yours is not exactly a leper.

Being Catholic doesn’t mean jumping in front of a speeding train.
 
We as a community unite ourselves to the Eucharist, not individually.

Jim
It is not an either or situation. Jesus comes to us and He enters each individual soul. It is not either communal or personal. It is both.
 
According to Church Law the Eucharistic Celebration is more properly celebrated with at least one other participant and not alone, unless the celebrant is thereby unable to attend the Eucharist. Prior to 1917 there had to be a grave cause why the priest would celebrate alone.
See ewtn.com/library/liturgy/zlitur151.htm

The Mass is not a private devotion, but a communal celebration.
 
A well-fed, ill-mannered ten year old boy wiping his snotty nose on his hands and wanting to shake yours is not exactly a leper.

Being Catholic doesn’t mean jumping in front of a speeding train.
My daughter’s father in-law is immuno supressed. He has a donated organ and takes anti-rejection drugs. If he gets a cold or flu it is a serious matter and he gets ill often. The normal healthy person might get a cold from the snotty kid and have some temporary discomfort. For the very elderly their next cold could be their last.

A friend of mine specializes in anti-terrorism. Among other things he studies how bioterrorism might be enacted and countered. Some years ago he spoke in front of a group of about 300 people, consisting of ambasadors, the vice-president at the time, various administration federal officials and secretaries. He spoke about how pathogens might deliberately be spred quickly through any population. Seceretly, he put a chemical on his right hand before entering the hall. People he knew and to whom he was introduced shook his hand. They shook the hands of others. At the conclusion of his talk he told the audience that on the way out the door they should put their hand under a black light to see if they were infected, or came in contact with what could have been a deliberate attempt to infect them with some deadly pathogen. The harmless chemical was visible under the light.

Every person in the room lit up including the VP of the United States and his secret service body guards there to protect him.

There is a difference between being a germophobe and being prudent.

Another friend is an usher at a local parish. He knows everyone and greets everyone with a handshake. When I go there I am glad to see him and shake his hand, but am also aware that this means I have indirect contact with numerous sick people. I don’t carry sanitizer, but accept the risk. Today I have a bit of a sore throat coming on and slightly swollen glands. Should I be physically contacting my fellow parishoners? When people greet me and put their hand out and I am sick I tell them not to shake my hand, because I don’t want to make them sick. Many will grab my hand anyway and say they do not care and go off and greet others. Is that prudent?

My daughter is an RN working in a hospital in labor and delivery. She is trained to wash her hands every time she leaves a patient’s room, which could be dozens of times in a 12 hour shift, and her patients are not even sick.

It seems like we take all of this information about how disease is spred and how the spred can be prevented and throw it out the window when we go to Church.

So what if the snotty kid is not a leper. He is infectous and his parents should keep his nose wiped and keep him away from others until he is well, or better yet, keep him home.
 
Grandfather, I believe you are agreeing with Sailor Kenshin and that he was trying to make the same point you are. Just wanted to point that out.
 
It is not an either or situation. Jesus comes to us and He enters each individual soul. It is not either communal or personal. It is both.
YES! Thank you for saying this!

I truly do not understand the people here who are saying that Mass is strictly a communal celebration. So if you have an individual relationship with the Lord, you are supposed to throw it out the window when you go to Mass? That makes no sense at all. Read St. Faustina’s diary and see how she experienced the Mass and the Eucharist - it was deeply personal for her, but not in a way that excluded other people.
 
You are way more likely to catch something in the Holy Water, since wet hands transmit germs to your face a lot faster than dry hands.
Even with the Holy water you have to have faith. Jesus healed lepers. I’m sure he can contain germs from infecting his faithful at his Mass. But like I said if you’re not faithful in this small matter then you are probably going to get sick now and again; however, I have never been sick from anything at Church and I never will because I’m not there to get sick, I’m there to receive Jesus.
 
The sign of peace doesn’t necessitate the shaking of hands. There are other ways of offering the sign of peace, especially if one is sick and doesn’t think shaking hands is best. A polite bow or nod is just as good. If othe people don’t understand your actions, explain it to them. Really, the sign of peace is not that difficult to perform.
We have to be willing to touch the sick as a sign of faith.
 
Okay, so the Sign of Peace is definitely a nice sentiment. But I really don’t enjoy shaking people’s hands. Especially in the winter with cold and flu season. It would be one thing if it was AFTER taking the Eucharist, but it’s not. So you watch someone sneeze, then s/he shakes your hand, and then you go up, get the Eucharist in your hands, and in goes the Body of Christ and all of your fellow parishioners’ germs.

Does anyone else feel this way?
No, when I’m at Mass I try to think about what’s important.
 
My daughter’s father in-law is immuno supressed. He has a donated organ and takes anti-rejection drugs. If he gets a cold or flu it is a serious matter and he gets ill often. The normal healthy person might get a cold from the snotty kid and have some temporary discomfort. For the very elderly their next cold could be their last.

A friend of mine specializes in anti-terrorism. Among other things he studies how bioterrorism might be enacted and countered. Some years ago he spoke in front of a group of about 300 people, consisting of ambasadors, the vice-president at the time, various administration federal officials and secretaries. He spoke about how pathogens might deliberately be spred quickly through any population. Seceretly, he put a chemical on his right hand before entering the hall. People he knew and to whom he was introduced shook his hand. They shook the hands of others. At the conclusion of his talk he told the audience that on the way out the door they should put their hand under a black light to see if they were infected, or came in contact with what could have been a deliberate attempt to infect them with some deadly pathogen. The harmless chemical was visible under the light.

Every person in the room lit up including the VP of the United States and his secret service body guards there to protect him.

There is a difference between being a germophobe and being prudent.

Another friend is an usher at a local parish. He knows everyone and greets everyone with a handshake. When I go there I am glad to see him and shake his hand, but am also aware that this means I have indirect contact with numerous sick people. I don’t carry sanitizer, but accept the risk. Today I have a bit of a sore throat coming on and slightly swollen glands. Should I be physically contacting my fellow parishoners? When people greet me and put their hand out and I am sick I tell them not to shake my hand, because I don’t want to make them sick. Many will grab my hand anyway and say they do not care and go off and greet others. Is that prudent?

My daughter is an RN working in a hospital in labor and delivery. She is trained to wash her hands every time she leaves a patient’s room, which could be dozens of times in a 12 hour shift, and her patients are not even sick.

It seems like we take all of this information about how disease is spred and how the spred can be prevented and throw it out the window when we go to Church.

So what if the snotty kid is not a leper. He is infectous and his parents should keep his nose wiped and keep him away from others until he is well, or better yet, keep him home.
So you go to Church without the Faith that Jesus healed the sick? If you don’t believe you don’t have the protection of God. In all the years I’ve gone to church I’ve never once gotten sick. I have never gotten sick because I have faith that a Church is a place of worship and not an infirmary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top