How do you know for sure human logic and reason correspond to reality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blase6
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
All human thought and speech involves some reason, whether it is coherent or not. So I cannot really “leave” reason in questioning its veracity.

But maybe human beings have it all wrong by their intrinsic nature. Who can tell.
No, if our mind were so intrinsically flawed, we wouldn’t be alive.

Or rather, we’d be able to live only at the bare animal level. But with so much of our body’s strength going to subserve a head that could not grasp physical reality, and therefore useless to survival, our bodies would be a colossal biological flop, rather than the near dominant organism they have become.

ICXC NIKA.
 
No, if our mind were so intrinsically flawed, we wouldn’t be alive.

Or rather, we’d be able to live only at the bare animal level. But with so much of our body’s strength going to subserve a head that could not grasp physical reality, and therefore useless to survival, our bodies would be a colossal biological flop, rather than the near dominant organism they have become.

ICXC NIKA.
And you know that how? From reason and experience?
 
To protect he sanity of thos viewing this thread I have enclosed some statements from the First Vatican Council. These statements reflect Divine Revelation and state certaing imortant truths. The underlying message is that God created a real world and he put intelligent creatures in it with the task of knowing and governing that world. The fact that he created intelligent creatures with that task indicates that human logic and reason were created with the ability to do the job. Is God a lier? Is he a trickster? Did he create us without the ability to use our locical faculties to reach a true conclusion?

THE VATICAN COUNCIL 1869-1870

Ecumenical XX (on Faith and the Church)

SESSION III (April 24, 1870)

Dogmatic Constitution concerning the Catholic Faith *

1781 But now, with the bishops of the whole world sitting and judging with us, gathered together in this Ecumenical Council by Our authority in the Holy Spirit, We, having relied on the Word of God, written and transmitted as We have received it, sacredly guarded and accurately explained by the Catholic Church, from this chair of PETER, in the sight of all, have determined to profess and to declare the salutary doctrine of Christ, after contrary errors have been proscribed and condemned by the power transmitted to Us by God.

Chap. 1. God, Creator of All Things

1782 [The one, living, and true God and His distinction from all things.] * The holy, Catholic, Apostolic, Roman Church believes and confesses that there is one, true, living God, Creator and Lord of heaven and earth, omnipotent, eternal, immense, incomprehensible, infinite in and will, and in every perfection; who, although He is one, singular, altogether simple and unchangeable spiritual substance, must be proclaimed distinct in reality and essence from the world; most blessed in Himself and of Himself, and ineffably most high above all things which are or can be conceived outside Himself [can. 1-4].

1783 The act of creation in itself, and in opposition to modern errors, and the effect of creation] . This sole true God by His goodness and “omnipotent power,” not to increase His own beatitude, and not to add to, but to manifest His perfection by the blessings which He bestows on creatures, with most free volition, “immediately from the beginning of time fashioned each creature out of nothing, spiritual and corporeal, namely angelic and mundane; and then the human creation, common as it were, composed of both spirit and body” [Lateran Council IV, see n. 428; can. 2 and 5]

1784 [The result of creation] .But God protects and governs by His providence all things which He created, “reaching from end to end mightily and ordering all things sweetly” [cf. Wisd. 8:1]. For “all things are naked and open to His eyes” Heb. 4:13], even those which by the free action of creatures are in the future.

Linus2nd

 
I’m not going to make any arguments for this, because then I will be attacked for using reason to deny reason.

I just wonder, how do you answer this?
The handling of this matter depends on the particular theory of mind that one subscribes to (although some theories of mind are such that one cannot actually “subscribe to them”).

And on one’s schedule or to-do list …😊
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top