J
Jaysuitical
Guest
A lot of misguided and even more malicious people often pointed to Benedict’s wearing of the red shoes to be some sort of sign of self-indulgence; but it was the tradition of the popes to wear red shoes, if I’m coorrect, after the Dominican Pius IV adopted the white habit of his order replacing the cardinal red that popes had worn up till then.With respect,What?.
Pope Benedict and Pope John Paul II, not to mention Pope Paul VI, Pope John XXIII, Pius XII, XI, etc. were NONE of them ‘haughty’ or not humble. They were all humble men. So what about Pope Francis makes you think him ‘more’ humble than others and why should that affect ‘social justice’ more than it was affected under say Pope Benedict or Pope John Paul II etc etc.?
The purpose of taking the evangelical vow of poverty is to show a complete abandonment of the world. John Paul’s only possession at death was his wall cross, but because he lived in the papal apartments, people could say 'Well, of course he could be poor if he didn’t have to pay for anything!!"
Obviously only those with severe animus against the Church in some way would see John Paul or Benedict as proud. But the evangelical counsels make visible to anyone what otherwise God alone could truly see.