Positivity can feel phony. I feel the most comfortable being negative at least there are no surprises. Trusting people can be difficult. Everyone is different and has different values, morals, biases, prejudices.
People tend to use being positive to control how you behave. When someone says, “Don’t be so negative.” Or, “no negative thoughts here.”
But if that’s the case, then people would ignore impoverishment, and do nothing to help the poor. Thus, do I find the language of positive/negative to be uncharitable. I get it, though, people want to keep their sense/wits/sanity about themselves. So not to fall into being depressed or some unhealthy/disordered view. What could be referred as negative (i.e. taking away from something good.) Which is understood, in that way. However, if someone cannot come to you with their wounds, hurt, and pain. Because you have simply told them to feel no hurt or pain, and seek assistance in saying so. In other words, the tendency of the positive/negative language/view/respect of culture tends to slide into the direction of selfishness. Not seeing the damage/hurt/wounds of the world.
Interesting, this comes from new age alignments of thinking/though that merit their idea’s from the East/Orient traditions. In fact, the parents of the Nepalian prince, kept rotting fruit, the sick, and dying from their son. They were Hindu. And from there, wanted their son to be ignorant of aging and dying. Thus, a negative view of what was around them. But then once their son saw what happened, he left. And became a prominent philosopher/contributor of Buddhism. Thus called the Buddha. He at least saw the negative.
But new agists today, like to employ a similar tactic as his parents with people. To deny the evils around the culture. Things like death and aging.
I do not like the language surrounding being positive. It is a mis-use and distortion of language. Negative means absence of what should be there. We say -15 degree Fahrenheit. To mean below freezing, negative. Or when you are in debt, and owe money. Negative has a profitable purpose. For even Jesus was being taken away through death. Through the nails on the Cross. Many would say that is really negative. But the truth is, Jesus died because of us. Because of sin. Because of society. Because of the world.
He would not let us slide into the absence/negative encounter with sin. But to be a light/a positive to the world: the means of Salvation. Not ignoring the pain and hurt of the world. But to long endure it for the Salvation of souls. Thus Jesus is the unconquered light. He conquered death. And love triumphed, in the end.
Ignoring what is evil, just to be positive does nothing. And so, in that way, in that view of the word “positive” is really a negative, masquerading as a positive. When it isn’t Anyone who thinks it’s a positive to ignore the evils, just to make one’s self feel good. Are doing nothing to fight the absence caused by the darkness of sin.