How do you understand the First Person of the Trinity as Father in light of suffering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ethereality
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

ethereality

Guest
How do you see God as Father?

When I suffer, it is not clear to me whether it is the god described by Muhammad punishing me for blasphemy concerning Jesus, or if it is the god of Jesus encouraging me to grow in virtue, or if God does not exist and I am trying to convince myself of a delusion. I frequently suffer from various ailments every day that God could easily heal, but hasn’t yet.
 
+JMJ+

God is the Father who let His most beloved Son to suffer for our sins, and lets us participate in this Passion as Christ’s Body.

I now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ, in my flesh, for his body, which is the church. (Colossians 1:24)
 
God is the Father who let His most beloved Son to suffer for our sins, and lets us participate in this Passion as Christ’s Body.

I now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ, in my flesh, for his body, which is the church. (Colossians 1:24)
Two questions:
  1. How are we to understand “the Father who let His Son suffer”? That doesn’t sound loving or good – and when you say “for our sins”, it doesn’t sound just, either. (It sounds like you’re describing penal substitution theory, which apparently the Church condemns.) Finally, when you say “and lets us participate”, how does this not diminish what Jesus did if He didn’t do it alone, or (referring to your Colossians quotation) if there’s suffering He didn’t experience when He did it? In other words, how are we to regard “Jesus carrying the cross” if we are the ones carrying it? (Although, Biblically speaking, it looks like Simon of Cyrene carried the cross, at least part of the way, that Jesus was too weak to carry it the whole way himself – but this is beside the point.) All these questions demonstrate that I don’t really understand your point.
  2. How do you obtain confidence in your belief that you are part of Christ’s body, that reality is not one of the other possibilities I mentioned?
 
+JMJ+
Two questions:
  1. How are we to understand “the Father who let His Son suffer”? That doesn’t sound loving or good – and when you say “for our sins”, it doesn’t sound just, either. (It sounds like you’re describing penal substitution theory, which apparently the Church condemns.)
Notice the words I used: “let His Son suffer”. It is not “made His Son suffer.” Christ Himself, out of His love for us, gave Himself to us out of His free will, and the Father let Him. If you look at this part of the Catechism, one section is titled: “CHRIST OFFERED HIMSELF TO HIS FATHER FOR OUR SINS.” It would be best if you read the whole section.
Finally, when you say “and lets us participate”, how does this not diminish what Jesus did if He didn’t do it alone, or (referring to your Colossians quotation) if there’s suffering He didn’t experience when He did it? In other words, how are we to regard “Jesus carrying the cross” if we are the ones carrying it? (Although, Biblically speaking, it looks like Simon of Cyrene carried the cross, at least part of the way, that Jesus was too weak to carry it the whole way himself – but this is beside the point.) All these questions demonstrate that I don’t really understand your point.
(Isn’t that more than two questions? ;))

As the Catechism says,

618 The cross is the unique sacrifice of Christ, the “one mediator between God and men”. But because in his incarnate divine person he has in some way united himself to every man, “the possibility of being made partners, in a way known to God, in the paschal mystery” is offered to all men. He calls his disciples to “take up [their] cross and follow [him]”, for “Christ also suffered for [us], leaving [us] an example so that [we] should follow in his steps.” In fact Jesus desires to associate with his redeeming sacrifice those who were to be its first beneficiaries. This is achieved supremely in the case of his mother, who was associated more intimately than any other person in the mystery of his redemptive suffering.

Apart from the cross there is no other ladder by which we may get to heaven.​

There is no way you can diminish His Sacrifice by offering your own sacrifices to Him.
  1. How do you obtain confidence in your belief that you are part of Christ’s body, that reality is not one of the other possibilities I mentioned?
You didn’t forgot about my last post in your other thread, did you?

Then there is the visible difference in how virtuous people and people of vice react to the same suffering. As St. Augustine wrote:

Wherefore, though good and bad men suffer alike, we must not suppose that there is no difference between the men themselves, because there is no difference in what they both suffer. For even in the likeness of the sufferings, there remains an unlikeness in the sufferers; and though exposed to the same anguish, virtue and vice are not the same thing. For as the same fire causes gold to glow brightly, and chaff to smoke; and under the same flail the straw is beaten small, while the grain is cleansed; and as the lees are not mixed with the oil, though squeezed out of the vat by the same pressure, so the same violence of affliction proves, purges, clarifies the good, but damns, ruins, exterminates the wicked. And thus it is that in the same affliction the wicked detest God and blaspheme, while the good pray and praise. So material a difference does it make, not what ills are suffered, but what kind of man suffers them. For, stirred up with the same movement, mud exhales a horrible stench, and ointment emits a fragrant odor.

City of God, Book I, Chapter 8
 
Then there is the visible difference in how virtuous people and people of vice react to the same suffering. As St. Augustine wrote:

Wherefore, though good and bad men suffer alike, we must not suppose that there is no difference between the men themselves, because there is no difference in what they both suffer. For even in the likeness of the sufferings, there remains an unlikeness in the sufferers; and though exposed to the same anguish, virtue and vice are not the same thing. For as the same fire causes gold to glow brightly, and chaff to smoke; and under the same flail the straw is beaten small, while the grain is cleansed; and as the lees are not mixed with the oil, though squeezed out of the vat by the same pressure, so the same violence of affliction proves, purges, clarifies the good, but damns, ruins, exterminates the wicked. And thus it is that in the same affliction the wicked detest God and blaspheme, while the good pray and praise. So material a difference does it make, not what ills are suffered, but what kind of man suffers them. For, stirred up with the same movement, mud exhales a horrible stench, and ointment emits a fragrant odor.

City of God, Book I, Chapter 8
Beautiful quote. thank you.
 
[God the Father] “let His Son suffer”. It is not “made His Son suffer.” Christ Himself, out of His love for us, gave Himself to us out of His free will, and the Father let Him. If you look at this part of the Catechism, one section is titled: “CHRIST OFFERED HIMSELF TO HIS FATHER FOR OUR SINS.” It would be best if you read the whole section.
I just did. How is God the Father not a wrathful sadist? This looks like God is offended by people’s disobedience and demands something innocent suffer before He will forgive and help us. That God allowed this to be His own Son makes it worse, not better, because it implies God cares more about seeing something suffer than His own family.

The thought occurs to me that it’s not about suffering, but about obedience. But Jesus was obedient, yet God made Jesus suffer: Jesus asked for another way, and God apparently said, “No, I want you to suffer,” hence the Passion. So apparently God really did want Jesus to suffer, and wants us to suffer.

Please explain all this to me. I don’t understand it, and as my OP says, I don’t see how to see God as a Loving Father in light of suffering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top