How does a Catholic increase the chance of getting into Heaven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eclipse880
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you only knew. Mary, and all the saints in heaven, can hear us even when all we do is think of them…which is a far cry from your capacity. Tanner, she knows what you just thought and wrote about her, too. Pity.

Why so opposed to the idea of those in heaven having the capacity to spiritually communicate with us? Does it diminish God’s Glory that His family in both realms can all speak with one another? Or…does it beautifully and supernaturally express it? Methinks the latter.

Why would you presume that those in heaven are not one with God and given the power by Him to sense things still on earth?

Do you believe in angels? Do you believe they watch over you and can sense your spiritual thoughts? If so, why not the saints?

Or do you believe Mary to not be in heaven? I cringe at your potential answer to this.
The Mary of the Catholic Church is in no way the same as the Mary in the Bible based on the distinctions you give your Mary compared to Mary, the mother of Jesus and mother of other children and wife of Joseph. In this sense; you have a fictions Mary.

The belief in guardian angels has been around for a long time, but there is no explicit scriptural basis for it.

On the first question; there is no evidence to this and then they would have to be omnipresent or omniscience and these are the attributes of God.
 
You guys are delusional. It takes much more than a declaration of Faith to make you pure enough to enter heaven. It takes prayer, sacrifice and acts of love and mercy. You must do more than acknowlege Christ. You must follow in his footsteps.
**
At least you admit a works salvation; one honest person.**
 
Who makes you the arbiter of truth? Don’t you think it arrogant & presumptuous to accuse someone of Fr Corapi’s credentials of error tanner? I will pray that you develop a little humility brother… as well as some discernment as to ‘truth’. 😉
Is he a human? Yes. Are all humans except Jesus fallible? Yes. Is Corapi human? Yes.
therefore he is a fallible human unless you think he is Jesus. I have nice things to say about him; you are one hostile person.
 
Why are you telling us Catholics what our sacraments are? Particularly when you don’t know. there are 7 Catholic Sacraments, in 3 groups:

Sacraments of initiation:
Baptism
The eucharist
Confirmation
You might reread my statement, then reply again. All I said was that we have 2 ordinances or commands, the Lords Supper and Water Baptism, which are not sacraments as per Catholic definition of those terms.
 
You are very misguided if you believe that verse is a command to see a priest,
The imperative mode, just like the one you use when you command us to “search the scriptures” is the one used here. It is not a suggestion!

The Apostle commands them to “send for the presbyters”. “Priest” is not a translation of the word “hierus”, but a contracted latinization of “presbyter”. The duties and responsibility of the priest in the Catholic Church is identical to that described in scripture of presbyters. So, yes, we read that as a command to call for the priest. In this passage of James, it relates to a sick person who is presumably too ill to go to the presbyter. It is always more courteous if we can go to him.

Do you deny that the presbyters described in scripture have specific roles and responsibilities?
Code:
  in a confessional and ask for absolution, then do some outward expression of "I'm ashamed of my sin; look at me" ; that was a crime of the pharisees.  God sees the heart.
In those days, they did not have a “confessional”. They had a prayer “closet”, but most discussion with the presbyters happened out in the countryside, secluded in private residences, or in caves and catacombs. Such discussions and sacramental activites were considered treason, and were punishable by death.

I think you grossly misunderstand penance if you think it is “look at me”. On the contrary, when we do the deeds that befit repentance, we are to be as humble and unnoticable as possible, for our heavenly father will reward us later. If one is able to make reparation for sins without drawing attention to himself, so much the better! Penance is about making amends for the wrong one has done, it is not about calling attention to oneself, or parading one’s sins.
Code:
  How many times did you have to force yourself to go to confession and how many times did you rationalize a reason not to go today or this day or that day; how many times have you gone reluctantly; this is what God sees that no one else sees.
You are so right about this! I think the vast majority of American Catholics are too ashamed to take advantage of this great grace. However, Jesus knows the heart of man, and he knows that it is our secrets that keep us sick, and that failing to confess our sins makes us sick. This is made clear in scripture. In confession, we are able to face the shame of admitting our wrongs to at least one other person. If it is so hard to do with a human, how much more to be in the presence of God?

Anti-sacramental Christians either don’t believe in confession of sins at all, or they confess their sins to themselves, choosing to believe that God forgives them.
 
**
At least you admit a works salvation; one honest person.**
you know, Tanner, there are aspects of works in the Catholic view of salvation, but you can’t work your way to heaven on your own. You need to cooperate with God’s plan for you, doing his will for you to get to heaven. And this is done through grace. On the other hand, if you choose not to, you will be condemned. Ultimately, it is your choice on whether you go to heaven or hell. However, this does not make it independent of God’s plan. God, knowing what we will do before we do it, has planned the universe accordingly. And even though he knows what we will do through perfect foreknowledge, it is still ours to do and we will be held responsible for our choices, which are freely made.

As you can see, Catholic theology perfectly marries God’s sovereignty and man’s free will, holding that both can coexist without infringing on the other. In this way, we recognize our debt to God without abdicating our responsiblity to stay in the state of grace after being given that gift through baptism.
 
Tanner …

What does Baptism of Fire mean to you ? Give some examples from scripture.
I said I do not know, but it sounds like judgment based on how John the Baptist uses the term for fire in general and I don’t want any of that fire baptism.
 
At least I can read and if you yelled loud enough I might hear you; but your Mary cannot.
It is curious that you seem to be so sure about this. You never did explain how it was that Saul could have a conversation with Samuel. How did Samuel know what was going on in Saul’s life? How could he deliver a prophetic word to Saul?

You also did not explain why Jesus went to the trouble to make sure that his Apostles were present at the transfiguration? How is it that Moses and Elijah could hear Jesus?

I think those who have gone on in the faith can hear whatever God allows them to hear. It seems to me that you have no authority to proclaim otherwise.
 
I beg to differ. You just ignored the scriptural verses he gave you that support the infusion of Grace from baptism

From John 3:

5 Jesus answered, "Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit.

How about this one from Acts 2:
37 Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart, and they asked Peter and the other apostles, “What are we to do, my brothers?”
38 Peter (said) to them, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the holy Spirit.
39 For the promise is made to you and to your children and to all those far off, whomever the Lord our God will call.”
Every time a Catholic sees water it must be baptism. This water refers to the purification ceremonies practice in the OT. Consider who He is speaking to; the last thing Nicodemus would have thought of was water baptism.
 
you know, Tanner, there are aspects of works in the Catholic view of salvation, but you can’t work your way to heaven on your own. You need to cooperate with God’s plan for you, doing his will for you to get to heaven. And this is done through grace. On the other hand, if you choose not to, you will be condemned. Ultimately, it is your choice on whether you go to heaven or hell. However, this does not make it independent of God’s plan. God, knowing what we will do before we do it, has planned the universe accordingly. And even though he knows what we will do through perfect foreknowledge, it is still ours to do and we will be held responsible for our choices, which are freely made.

As you can see, Catholic theology perfectly marries God’s sovereignty and man’s free will, holding that both can coexist without infringing on the other. In this way, we recognize our debt to God without abdicating our responsiblity to stay in the state of grace after being given that gift through baptism.
**
Thanks for being honest; I see none of your Catholic brothers or sisters rebuking you.**
 
**Thanks everyone for the dialogue; I have responded to all the posts I intend to and we are so far off the topic; I bear blame for some of that. I am leaving this thread as of now and I look forward to speaking and sharing the Word of God in the near future if the Lord allows.

God bless and have a fantastic weekend to all!**
 
I said I do not know, but it sounds like judgment based on how John the Baptist uses the term for fire in general and I don’t want any of that fire baptism.
Couldn’t he have meant the tongues of fire that appeared above everyone’s head at Pentecost? As far as I know this was the only manifestation of that, and it was of course done for effect to signal the initial coming of the Spirit. The only other time that the Spirit came in an abnormal way (other than the laying of hands) was in the case of Cornelius and his household and this was also done for effect, to demonstrate to Peter that the Gentiles could also be saved. In every other case, the spirit comes through the laying on of hands form the Apostles or bishops.
 
Thread over 1,000 post limit and closed.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top