S
stenlis
Guest
I haven’t seen a coherent definition of what actually ‘free will’ is. But that’s not what I want to ask here - I suppose ‘free will’ is some kind of ‘control over one’s actions’. What I do find puzzling is - how does determinism/non-determinism enter free will. Because, to me it seems that it doesn’t.
Let me illustrate that on an example of two robots - one deterministic, one non-deterministic:
Suppose I create a robot for mowing my lawn.
Let me illustrate that on an example of two robots - one deterministic, one non-deterministic:
Suppose I create a robot for mowing my lawn.
- I create a definite deterministic formula of what path the robot should take to cover my yard - very straightforward - the robot will always take the same path when I send him out to do his job. Clearly, it would be hard to say that he has any ‘free will’ as his actions are totally subjected to a simple formula
- I let the robot use pure chance. I program it in such a way that it will follow a straight path until it hits an obstacle (or the end of the yard) and then he will randomly choose a new direction (i.e. he will toss a die or measure the spin of a couple of electrons or use whatever you would consider a truly non-deterministic source to get a random direction). In this case, it also doesn’t seem like the robot has any kind of ‘free will’ as he has no power over what the outcome of a truly random event will be.
- why do you think determinism/non-determinism influences ‘free will’?
- what would the robot have to have in order for you to say that he has a ‘free will’? could you define it rather than just give a fancy name to it (i.e. saying that he had to have ‘soul’ does not explain much unless you define it)?