How does one fit into this community?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JReducation
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The reason that I started this thread and put my experience out there is because I have come to know some lovers of tradition who like me, have felt uncomfortable in what the Internet presents as the “traditionalist community”, which is very different from the real people that you find in your typical parish. I can’t speak for an Ecclesia Dei parish, because I’ve never been to one. The closest has been to an SSPX parish, but my experience there was not positive. That has nothing to do with the laity. It has to do with the way they form their priests.

I’ve only met FSSP priests. I’ve never met the Canons of St. John or the priests from Christ the King. The FSSP priests were delightful and very different from the SSPX priest. You could tell that the formation program was different, not in matters of faith and morals, but in matters of clericalism. The FSSP is not clerical in that sense.

The lay people who attend these parishes and chapels have an environment in which they can share and express their likes and dislikes. I hope they are accepted.

However, the environment on tradition threads or forums can be like sailing a canoe through a hurricane torn ocean. There is a lot of pulling in all directions, because everyone wants to be right and everyone wants to push their idea of what they believe the Church should do or not do.

For some of us, this pushing and tugging is unnerving. My hope is that those who are silent, because they are not in the same place as other lovers of tradition, but are lovers of tradition, will feel that it’s OK to share and that everyone else will see how good it is when brothers and sisters live as one.

I’d like to do this for the people who attend the TLM in a diocesan parish and don’t use the internet. That’s why I was asking about the classes. Until we begin to open the door for all people to speak their mind without fear of being bashed or told that they are wrong in the most rude form possible, we will not get past this hump.

It is becoming very clear that people at the extremes of the spectrum, right and left, seem to feel that rudeness is justified by their cause. That’s not true at all. Christ was never rude.

Before anyone hits me over the head with what he said to the Pharisees and Sadducees, those statements have to be taken in context. Christ was protecting the voiceless from the few religious leaders who wanted to keep them oppressed by instilling fear of God and religion into them. He was not on the attack. He was not trying to protect his position, but real people with feelings. Jesus never apologized for his positions and never defended them. When asked a question, he simply responded. When someone didn’t want to hear, he would go on his way. But when the voiceless were threatened, the then came to their defense. You cannot use religion to control other people. That was his message to them.

We need to do that around hear too. When the extremes jump all over someone, we must be like Christ and come out in the defense of the underdog.
 
Sometimes, I feel like a fish out of water on this forum and several others too. I have lived in several countries and about 10 dioceses, I think, not to mention religious houses. None of them have been perfect. Some were so far from perfect that I prayed daily to be taken out of there. I remember one situation where I did ask the superior general to please do something about it or to transfer me. But I never told anyone else how I felt about it, just him. He was the only person who had the power to resolve my problem.

The reason that I feel like a fish out of water is because despite the fact that I have lived and worked in very imperfect situations, some of them downright sinful, I never felt the need or the urge to go public with my concerns. I never felt the need or the urge to express my opinion. Of course I had no feelings about things that other people did over there when I was too busy over here. I can’t be in two places at one time. As I told a lady who asked me if I had noticed the short skirt of the girl in front of me at mass. “No, I’m afraid I didn’t. Because I can’t pray unless I close my eyes. With my eyes closed, I can’t see the girl in front of me. So I either look at the girl and don’t pray or I pray and don’t get to see the girl. I wish I could help you, but I can’t.” :o

I realize that some people hate me. You should see my emails and the hate mail I get, because I just can’t bring myself to join in the complaining about the Church, be it local or global.

It’s not that I’m blind. It has more to do with something that I learned as a novice and I have never forgotten. “I am what I am before God . . . nothing else.” I know that I’m not the Messiah. I know that I’m not a caretaker. I know that I’m not the sharpest needle in the sewing basket. So I limit myself to tackling those things that are within my limited abilities and limited intellect.

I feel that I have to share this here, because I’m getting some PMs and emails from people who think that I’m indifferent, because I don’t complain. But I don’t complain because to complain on these forums is not going to solve anything. Unless Pope Francis or my bishop read these, its just not productive. **Whereas, I find teaching very productive. When someone comes in with a mistaken idea or a question. That’s a good use of the time on the forum. **

I also understand that bishops and popes have very busy lives. I have worked for several bishops. There is no way that they can handle every problem in a diocese. They have to pick and choose. The bishop’s priorities are not always going to be my priorities. However, I accept that, because we’re too different people. What I see as urgent he does not and the other way around. To get him to see things my way, I would have to change him. It’s not my role in life to change who people are. God puts people in our path to challenge us, to enrich our lives, and at times even to make us do penance. If we try to change those folks, we may find that we’re tampering with God’s plan for us.

Maybe it can be considered complaining. I’m not sure. When I find something that I think it’s sooooo serious that the bishop or a religious superior should get involved, I contact that person. But I never tell anyone what I saw or what I perceive to be a concern, except in broad strokes. I may say that I believe there is a problem with how we prepare children for Confirmation. I won’t say that there is a problem with how the following parishes prepare them for Confirmation and then proceed to make a list. If I have such a list, it goes to the bishop.

Am I strange? Am I really as bad a person as a few people say I am? I’m curious. Please be gentle. I’m an old man. :yup:
(bold is mine).
I cant tell you how much I appreciate your teaching and insight over the years I have been here. I have a file of responses from you that I have cut and pasted as I have found them invaluable. Many of them have been answers and insights over things that have caused me concern and even doubt.

I dont speak up too much and reply very often because I know humility is important to you, and I dont want to tempt ego, especial male ego. I know I have a challenge with my own and dont want to challenge others with theirs.

So for every email or PM you get that from those who criticize you, I expect that there are more of us who are grateful for your presence here, even if it is hard for you. We just may not say it all the time.

I know in my journey to try and be a credible and authentic disciple of Our Lord, (and I fail more than I succeed) your words of insight, wisdom and instruction have had a major impact.

I pray God may always bless your and your community. And I thank Him for your very presence here.

May God grant you peace even when others words and deeds challenge it.
 
I’ve never met the Canons of St. John **or the priests from Christ the King. ** .
If you’re not acquainted with ICKSP than you’re missing out, i.m.o. They embody traditionalism in its finest and purest: liturgy, sacraments, doctrinal understanding. (Not making a comparison with FSSP, which may be just as fine, because I have not visited them.)

In addition, I refer to the personal holiness of the ICKSP priests. 👍
🙂
 
So it IS a series. Would have a copy of the topics?
Some of the topics which have been covered in the pre-Mass talks include: Marriage and the Family; The Virtues; and Holy Purity.
I am linking to the parish webpage below which contains contact information for Father, as well as links to several weekly bulletins. If you look over the bulletins, you will find that Father devotes about a page per week to ongoing education on various topics. This also is most helpful. We can read at our leisure. Authors and sources are always cited so that we may do additional reading should we choose to do so.
If you contact our priest, perhaps he can share his convert and revert instructional approaches and some of the other topics which have been presented to his parishioners in his pre-Mass presentations. The presentations do not happen every week; rather, we might have presentations over several weeks once or twice per year. People arrive with notebooks and tape recorders. There seems to be a great hunger for catechesis, for learning our history and growing in our faith.
Our parish website is:

northamericanmartyrs.org/

May God bless you and those whom you serve. Amen.
 
The lay people who attend these parishes and chapels have an environment in which they can share and express their likes and dislikes. I hope they are accepted.
However, the environment on tradition threads or forums can be like sailing a canoe through a hurricane torn ocean. There is a lot of pulling in all directions, because everyone wants to be right and everyone wants to push their idea of what they believe the Church should do or not do.
For some of us, this pushing and tugging is unnerving. My hope is that those who are silent, because they are not in the same place as other lovers of tradition, but are lovers of tradition, will feel that it’s OK to share and that everyone else will see how good it is when brothers and sisters live as one
It certainly is like traveling a storm at times, even in groups or within parishes, never mind the internet. I think that sometimes we are unaware of our tone, attitude or the effect we may have on people and forget to consider different personalities.

The words that put my back up are “You are wrong” because I instantly go on the defensive or the “Didn’t you know that?” in a condescending tone, which immediately gives me a bad attitude. If someone says “Have you thought about?”, “Have a look at?” or “Maybe you should ask your priest” , I feel able to stay open, thank them and research it further.

This forum is often the only place for some of us to discuss aspects of faith. Unlike a live face to face discussion, we can chose not to be present if we do not understand a Thread or feel things are getting a little heated (albeit out of love). For me, it is a wonderful opportunity to still my tongue (it is irritatingly independent). I can travel at my own pace and then if I have exhausted the Forum, I can settle down for a conversation with God.
 
If you’re not acquainted with ICKSP than you’re missing out, i.m.o. They embody traditionalism in its finest and purest: liturgy, sacraments, doctrinal understanding. (Not making a comparison with FSSP, which may be just as fine, because I have not visited them.)

In addition, I refer to the personal holiness of the ICKSP priests. 👍
🙂
They’re certainly colorful. I’ll give them that. I would love to see their ceremonies live. I saw the Canons of St. John C on EWTN. They looked like your typical religious congregation of clerics, with the EF. That’s not a putdown. It’s just what it is. The religious life came across much more strongly, which is how it’s supposed to happen in a religious community. That doesn’t always happen. I’ve been in places run by Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits and others and it’s like a diocesan parish, except that the priest has letters after his name that most people don’t know what they mean. There is not that flavor that they should bring to the ministry. From what I saw on the Canon on TV, they certainly brought that flavor to the broadcast.
Some of the topics which have been covered in the pre-Mass talks include: Marriage and the Family; The Virtues; and Holy Purity.
I am linking to the parish webpage below which contains contact information for Father, as well as links to several weekly bulletins. If you look over the bulletins, you will find that Father devotes about a page per week to ongoing education on various topics. This also is most helpful. We can read at our leisure. Authors and sources are always cited so that we may do additional reading should we choose to do so.
If you contact our priest, perhaps he can share his convert and revert instructional approaches and some of the other topics which have been presented to his parishioners in his pre-Mass presentations. The presentations do not happen every week; rather, we might have presentations over several weeks once or twice per year. People arrive with notebooks and tape recorders. There seems to be a great hunger for catechesis, for learning our history and growing in our faith.
Our parish website is:

northamericanmartyrs.org/

May God bless you and those whom you serve. Amen.
I’m going to speak to my team leader and if she agrees, I’m going to volunteer to contact Father. I went through the bulletin and like the blurbs.
It certainly is like traveling a storm at times, even in groups or within parishes, never mind the internet. I think that sometimes we are unaware of our tone, attitude or the effect we may have on people and forget to consider different personalities.
There are two tendencies that often prevail on the Internet. 1) We forget that the writer on the other side is a human being with a life and obligations. He or she does not have the time or even the energy to read everything from every pope between Trent and Vatican II. When people start throwing these documents around, the other person is made to feel inadequate. I become most irritated when the poster copies and pastes the document in Latin knowing full well that not everyone can read Latin and that there are perfectly good translations to English. That’s mean. There is a tendency to forget that you’re being mean and condescending to a real human being who could be your relative.
  1. There seems to be a belief that it’s OK to be rude in the name of tradition. I saw a post once where the person wrote something like. “It doesn’t matter if I was rude. It’s only a venial sin.” My immediate thought was, “That’s a hard one to forgive, because venial or mortal contrition is still a requirement for forgiveness.” If people feel that they can commit sins on the Internet and they carry less weight than in real life, they are very mistaken. I sometimes wonder if they carry more weight, because there is a certain abuse of power. Your anonymity empowers you.
The words that put my back up are “You are wrong” because I instantly go on the defensive or the “Didn’t you know that?” in a condescending tone, which immediately gives me a bad attitude.
They’re unnerving for two reasons. First, they carry the weight of authority. If you mother or your teacher says that you’re wrong, you don’t like it, but you’re not going to feel attacked. Second, they are unnerving because you can’t hear the other person’s voice. All you’re seeing is the words. Your mind can give them any inflection it wants.
That’s an advantage of religious life. You do this everyday.
For me, it is a wonderful opportunity to still my tongue (it is irritatingly independent).
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

That’s why the Gospel says that it’s what comes out of the mouth that does the person harm.
 
They’re certainly colorful. I’ll give them that.
You thought that the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest is about “color?” :confused:
I would love to see their ceremonies live.
And “ceremonies?” :eek:

Their liturgies (not “ceremonies” 😃 ) are authentic, awe-inspiring, and communicate that sense of the sacred that many in the Church long for. I hope that you will indeed get a chance to attend a live liturgy. Adoration & Benediction are also done beautifully. I’m sure you would appreciate them and be blessed by attending.

I realize that Religious tend to have their own confessors, but for us lay people, the chance to have our confessions heard by priests who uphold traditional moral theology, know the differences between serious and not serious sins, who are thorough, who do not race through the sacrament, who offer it abundantly, and are there to correct any misconceptions, are also blessings.

I will share with you how their Masses affect me: they fill me with gratitude, giving me an overflowing heart, as no other available liturgies do. That in itself is a spiritual benefit.
 
You thought that the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest is about “color?” :confused:
Noooo, what would make you think that?
And “ceremonies?” :eek:
Their liturgies (not “ceremonies” 😃 ) are authentic, awe-inspiring, and communicate that sense of the sacred that many in the Church long for.
Whoah!!!

Slow down. The term “ceremony” is correctly applied to liturgy. One can say: liturgy, ceremony, rites or rituals and they’re all correct. It is not an offensive term at all. Nor did I use it offensively.

This is what I mean when I ask how does one fit into this community? I use two words, “color” and “ceremony” and use them correctly and you respond as if I had done something wrong.

I do not underestimate the ministry, devotion or spirituality of the Institute of Christ the King for one moment. First of all, it is approved by the Church. That’s all I need to know. If it’s approved by the Church, then it must be orthodox. Secondly, it has never been suspected of not being orthodox. And finally, as I said before, I have never met them or even seen them on TV. I’ve only seen photographs of them. Why would I say anything that would suggest condescension about such an institute?
I hope that you will indeed get a chance to attend a live liturgy. Adoration & Benediction are also done beautifully. I’m sure you would appreciate them and be blessed by attending.
I’m sure I would. But they’re nowhere near us.
I realize that Religious tend to have their own confessors, but for us lay people, the chance to have our confessions heard by priests who uphold traditional moral theology, know the differences between serious and not serious sins, who are thorough, who do not race through the sacrament, who offer it abundantly, and are there to correct any misconceptions, are also blessings.
That’s no longer the case except for cloistered religious. Other religious have to stand on line like everyone else or find a confessor by appointment. In our community, we have only one priest. He is allowed to celebrate mass, but not allowed to hear confessions in the house. Normally, superiors do not grant faculties if there is only one priest in the house. It puts him in an uncomfortable situation.
I will share with you how their Masses affect me: they fill me with gratitude, giving me an overflowing heart, as no other available liturgies do. That in itself is a spiritual benefit.
That should be everyone’s experience at every liturgy. I know it is certainly my experience. If one truly appreciates the liturgy and approaches it with a deep sense of expectation and generosity at the same time, the Spirit works wonders on the soul. But one has to be open to the exchange between the soul and God. That’s what you’re describing, the effects of that openness.
 
**This is what I mean when I ask how does one fit into this community? I use two words, “color” and “ceremony” and use them correctly and you respond as if I had done something wrong. **

My thoughts exactly.
 
In your post on this thread regarding SP, you speak in general terms (post # 31). You don’t say anything about Catholics asking you to give them advice about this concern. If I misunderstood, it’s because you did not say that you were referring only to those who sought your advice on the subject at all.

It’s been my experience that those who seek advice on a particular concern would address it to those who share their particular viewpoint, and who would also take them seriously and not dismiss their concerns. I myself am not particularly concerned about SP being overruled, but I have respect for those who do, since I believe that those who have this concern are capable of reasonable deduction.
How do you figure Bro Jay is dismissing your concern?
 
People need to calm down-the Institute is rather colorful-they use the finest vestments, restore churches with the boldest colors, etc. They shoot for what they see as the ‘best’.

I attend their St. Louis Oratory from time to time, and had a local diocesan priest recount an encounter he had with them. He works closely with them, offering mass when their priests are on retreat and such. He told me of how one of the Canons in the US is the Master of Ceremonies of nearly all major institute masses in the states with bishops or superiors, and that one of the oblates, an abbe’, is the M.C. for nearly all of Europe when they can move him there for mass.

When the Institute’s oratory in K.C. was being dedicated, my priest friend was acting as subdeacon or deacon (can’t remember) for the dedication and mass with Bp. Finn. He was leading a procession around the church, and in through the doors. However, the line in was getting long. He said that he looked around frantically, wondering what to do- then this certain abbe’ met his gaze, and nodded. Fr. was taken aback. he said that, “It was as if he’d shot directions into my mind with his eyes. I looked at him again, and his mouth opened into a small smile, and he nodded. go around the block once more was what I’d heard. But he’d spoken no words. I’d just turned when I heard them, and he smiled and nodded. It was crazy”

The institute looks to restore a church of pre-revolution France, from before the revolution and onslaught of modernism. During the liturgy and when talking to the priests one finds humble men who love the church and her teachings, who are true gentleman and scholars.
 
The institute looks to restore a church of pre-revolution France, from before the revolution and onslaught of modernism. During the liturgy and when talking to the priests one finds humble men who love the church and her teachings, who are true gentleman and scholars.
They are men of God, who recognize the Mass for what it truly is, and who bring that gift to those of us fortunate enough to experience it. Both the sense of the sacred and the sense of Christ’s royalty (“Sovereign Priest”) characterize their liturgies, whatever colors are being used. And their humility is evident in how they behave as individuals, rather than how much they let the laity control the liturgy.

What a concept. 😉
 
Whoops. I meant to put the “Christ the King” in the parentheses. 🙂

Christ’s Kingship. We’re not the Kings. We are the servants. And our priesthood is one of belief, not of reign.
 
That’s why the Gospel says that it’s what comes out of the mouth that does the person harm.
One of my favorites…

I said, “I will watch my ways, lest I sin with my tongue; I will set a curb on my mouth.”
Dumb and silent before the wicked, I refrained from any speech. But my sorrow increased;
my heart smoldered within me. In my thoughts a fire blazed up, and I broke into speech:
LORD, let me know my end, the number of my days, that I may learn how frail I am.

(Psalm 39:2-5)


David knows that he can sin with his tongue and so he keeps his mouth shut. When he can hold it in no longer he cries out, not to man but to God.

The monks who spend significant portions of their lives in silence have the battle half won already.

-Tim-
 
The institute looks to restore a church of pre-revolution France, from before the revolution and onslaught of modernism. During the liturgy and when talking to the priests one finds humble men who love the church and her teachings, who are true gentleman and scholars.
In our tradition we call this “renewal”. It’s the attempt to recover that which has been lost, but is still appropriate for today’s man. Trust me, there is a great deal. :yup:
 
ok…I am new to this forum. Not sure I understand what is going on. If you do not complain about the Catholic Church, you are considered bad?

Seems odd, if true.

What am I missing?
 
ok…I am new to this forum. Not sure I understand what is going on. If you do not complain about the Catholic Church, you are considered bad?

Seems odd, if true.

What am I missing?
There is a tendency for the extreme right and extreme left to spend a lot of time and energy complaining about the cup being half empty. Then there is a silent majority in the middle that is not blind to the fact. but feels that the cup is half full. It does not want to engage in all of the negative complaining about things that we can not change or to people who cannot fixx what is broken. It’s like the old saying that only a child and a mad man repeats that which is ineffective over and over again. We’re not to sure about the child. Children will usually reach a point of extinction, where they’ll stop repeating, because it does not produce the desired results.

There are people at the extremes of faith to the right and left that just can’t stop complaining about things that either don’t affect them, they can’t change or the person to whom they’re speaking can’t change it. At the end of the day, they are exhausted and frustrated, plus they have successfully alienated some friends who just get tired of hearing it.

A simple example in my life. If I had $1.00 for each time I see a post on COTT and CITH, I could build a few more pregnancy help centers. Maybe those who want to complain about this should send me $1 each time they’re tempted to do so. 😃

These folks are talking to the wrong people. They’re posting on the internet and talking to like minded people. Bishops don’t read forums. The person to whom you should be speaking is to a bishop. Once you speak to a bishop, whatever he decides you learn to live with. He is the bishop and the local church is his to govern and to teach. As long as he’s within the law, the Holy See is not interested in how he settles these issues at a local level.

Since I know this, I mention to the bishop what’s on my mind once, maybe twice. If he does not show any interest, I drop it and I learn to live with things as they are. There are more important things that I want the bishop to attend to. I don’t need to drive him nuts over one issue and turn him off so that he sees me coming and runs in the opposite direction.
 
hmmmm…I am not extreme right or extreme left or in the middle.

I am Catholic. That means I follow the CCC. No wavering. If I ever choose not to follow the CCC, then I will be something other than Catholic. If I do not like the CCC, I will find a church that fits me.

Of course, we should try to fit God, not have God fit us…

What does that make me?
 
hmmmm…I am not extreme right or extreme left or in the middle.

I am Catholic. That means I follow the CCC. No wavering. If I ever choose not to follow the CCC, then I will be something other than Catholic. If I do not like the CCC, I will find a church that fits me.

Of course, we should try to fit God, not have God fit us…

What does that make me?
Normal?🤷
 
whew

not sure I understand the “far left Catholics” and “far right catholics” and conservative vs liberal catholics.

We have the Pope. We have the CCC. Follow them completely and be Catholic. Or, don’t, and be something else
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top