How is Limbo not Hell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VociMike
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So where’s part two? It doesn’t really matter. I’ve studied the ITC’s publication, The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die without being Baptized. I’ve also read Pope Benedict’s earlier comments, which he candidly admits are not stated in the capacity of his teaching office. Neither state that Limbo does not exist.
Sorry for the delay.

Here now is part 2 of the article.

Impact on non-Christians
He said the document also had implications for non-Christians, since it could be seen as suggesting that non-baptized adults could go to heaven if they led a good life.
“I think it shows that Benedict is trying to balance his view of Jesus as being central as the savior of the world … but at the same time not saying what the Evangelicals say, that anyone who doesn’t accept Jesus is going to hell,” he said in a phone interview.
The International Theological Commission is a body of Vatican-appointed theologians who advise the Pope and the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Benedict headed the Congregation for two decades before becoming pope in 2005.
Generations of torment
The Church teaches that baptism removes original sin which stains all souls since the fall from grace in the Garden of Eden.
Although Catholics have long believed that children who die without being baptized are with original sin and thus excluded from heaven, the Church has no formal doctrine on the matter.
Theologians, however, have long taught that such children enjoy an eternal state of perfect natural happiness, a state commonly called limbo, but without being in communion with God.
The thought that stillborn babies, for example, would be relegated to a kind of no-man’s-land in the afterlife tormented generations of Catholic families.
Concept of limbo
The document said that its conclusions should not be interpreted as questioning original sin or “used to negate the necessity of baptism or delay the conferral of the sacrament.”
Limbo, which comes from the Latin word meaning “border” or “edge,” was considered by medieval theologians to be a state or place reserved for the unbaptized dead, including good people who lived before the coming of Christ.
“People find it increasingly difficult to accept that God is just and merciful if he excludes infants, who have no personal sins, from eternal happiness, whether they are Christian or non-Christian,” the document said.
It said the study was made all the more pressing because “the number of nonbaptized infants has grown considerably, and therefore the reflection on the possibility of salvation for these infants has become urgent.”
Augustine’s teaching
The Theological Commission posted its document Friday on Origins, the documentary service of Catholic News Service.
“If there’s no limbo and we’re not going to revert to St. Augustine’s teaching that unbaptized infants go to hell, we’re left with only one option, namely, that everyone is born in the state of grace,” said the Rev. Richard McBrien, professor of theology at the University of Notre Dame.
“Baptism does not exist to wipe away the ’stain’ of original sin, but to initiate one into the Church,” he said in an e-mailed response Friday.
While the report does not carry the authority of a papal encyclical or even the weight of a formal document from the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, it was approved by the Pope on Jan. 19 and was published on the Internet—an indication that it was intended to be widely read by the faithful.
No certainty, just hope
“We can say we have many reasons to hope that there is salvation for these babies,” the Rev. Luis Ladaria, a Jesuit who is the commission’s secretary general, told The Associated Press. He stressed that there was no certainty, just hope.
The document traces centuries of Church views on the fate of unbaptized infants, paying particular attention to the writings of St. Augustine—the 4th century bishop who is particularly dear to Benedict. Augustine wrote that such infants do go to hell, but they suffer only the “mildest condemnation.”
In the document, the commission said that such views were now out of date and that there were “serious theological and liturgical grounds for hope that unbaptized infants who die will be saved and enjoy the beatific vision.”
It stressed, however, that “these are reasons for prayerful hope, rather than grounds for sure knowledge.”
Parents’ duty remains
No one can know for certain what becomes of unbaptized babies since Scripture is largely silent on the matter, the report said.
It stressed that none of its findings should be taken as diminishing the need for parents to baptize infants.
“Rather … they provide strong grounds for hope that God will save infants when we have not been able to do for them what we would have wished to do, namely, to baptize them into the faith and life of the church.” Reports from Reuters, AP and AFP
 
I believe I’ve read the article you’ve posted before. I seem to recall Richard McBrien’s dubious conclusions about original sin.

The ITC document that Pope Benedict approved for publication does not declare that limbo does not exist. In fact, it states:
Therefore, besides the theory of Limbo (which remains a possible theological opinion), there can be other ways to integrate and safeguard the principles of the faith grounded in Scripture . . . .
Paragraph 41.
This theory [limbo], elaborated by theologians beginning in the Middle Ages, never entered into the dogmatic definitions of the Magisterium, even if that same Magisterium did at times mention the theory in its ordinary teaching up until the Second Vatican Council. It remains therefore a possible theological hypothesis.
Preface.

As for the Pope’s earlier declaration while he was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he did express doubts about limbo as your article suggests, but he explicitly stated that he was not doing so in his capacity as Prefect.

Like I said, neither the ITC nor the Pope have declared that limbo does not exist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top