P
pablope
Guest
I think the issue is…using church resources to build a commencial enterprise…which raises the question…is the church’s purpose, one of them, to run a commercial enterprise?I really don’t understand all the hub bub over the LDS Church owning commercial property. What exactly is the objection here? Is it that a religious institution shouldn’t own commercial property at all? Is it that a religious institution may own commercial property but ought not invest in corporate interests? Is it that a religious institution may do all of the above but should rather use their property not set aside for ecclesiastical purposes for secular interests, such as schools, hospitals, charities, etc.? I might caution my fellow Catholics to take a minute to do some preliminary investigative work about our own glass houses before answering.
Which would have been more wise…to lease the property and get rent…and have someone build and run the enterprise and take the risk? Or build it directly and run it and take the risk?