F
frenchbeatle
Guest
Also, take into account that some people who voted yes, like me, would just go once out of curiosity and potentially never go again. Just something else to keep in mind in a poll like this. 
Well, that wouldn’t be surprising given that about 75% of Catholics don’t go to church regularly, even though there are much more plentiful OF Masses around.Also, take into account that some people who voted yes, like me, would just go once out of curiosity and potentially never go again.
Exactly. Sad that some people will ignore facts and statistics to further their own agenda.Well, that wouldn’t be surprising given that about 75% of Catholics don’t go to church regularly, even though there are much more plentiful OF Masses around.
that wasn’t in the context of the post i was replying to, so doesn’t affect my replyDid you read the surveys from Pax Liturgique and CARA?
sad that some people will manufacture statistics to further their own agendaExactly. Sad that some people will ignore facts and statistics to further their own agenda.
I’ve avoided saying this because I don’t want to spend forever arguing it – and because I haven’t seen the originals of the survey questions – but the sense I got reading the reports of those surveys was that they just asked incredibly vague questions. Along the lines of, “Would you be willing to go to a Traditional Latin Mass?” Well, I’d be willing to go to Mass in Uzbek, if I were in Tashkent and had to fulfill my Sunday obligation; it doesn’t mean I wouldn’t drive ten miles farther to get to an English Mass instead. And maybe I’d be willing to go to Mass in Uzbek here in Chicago if a friend asked me to go along one weekend, just to see what it was like. So you haven’t really found out much about my genuine interest level in the Uzbek Mass here.Exactly what am I making up?
What are the results of this thread’s survey, the CARA and Pax Liturgiuqie surveys?
How about talking numbers instead of opinion?
This is exactly what I was trying to say in my post. The question of the survey was “How many would attend the TLM if it was available?” A yes vote does not mean that that person would become a regular TLM attendee, it just means they would go at least once, or to fulfill the Sunday obligation if they had no other way to do so. To get a better idea of who would go regularly, the question would be more like “How many would attend the TLM regularly if it was available?” Now that survey would have very interesting results.I’ve avoided saying this because I don’t want to spend forever arguing it – and because I haven’t seen the originals of the survey questions – but the sense I got reading the reports of those surveys was that they just asked incredibly vague questions. Along the lines of, “Would you be willing to go to a Traditional Latin Mass?” Well, I’d be willing to go to Mass in Uzbek, if I were in Tashkent and had to fulfill my Sunday obligation; it doesn’t mean I wouldn’t drive ten miles farther to get to an English Mass instead. And maybe I’d be willing to go to Mass in Uzbek here in Chicago if a friend asked me to go along one weekend, just to see what it was like. So you haven’t really found out much about my genuine interest level in the Uzbek Mass here.
When you have a survey that on its face looks outlandish and completely out of keeping with reality – 60% of people want to go to Latin Mass, or whatever it is – then either the survey was bad, or you’re misinterpreting it (60% of people would be willing to be dragged to Latin Mass, maybe; or they might go to one once if it were really close by to see what the fuss is about), or both. Given that these surveys are so out of line with anything observed in reality, I’d really have to see the methodology and the questions, preferably in the original language, before putting any stock in these numbers.
I agree. A Catholic should endeavor to participate in every variety of Catholic Liturgy they can at least once (OF, EF, Byzantine, Maronite, etc.).I really think everyone should at least visit a TLM mass. There is real beauty there, and a wholly different kind of devotion!![]()
Or how about “If you haven’t attended a TLM, would you be interested?” Or “If you have attended, would you go again?” Or even better, “All other things being equal, (given that the closest OF or EF is the same distance from you and at the same time), would you prefer the EF or OF?” Point is there are unlimited number of questions you could ask to make it more interesting for yourself.To get a better idea of who would go regularly, the question would be more like “How many would attend the TLM regularly if it was available?” Now that survey would have very interesting results.
this is still pretty vague. i’m interested in attending an EF Mass. but i don’t think i’ll be a regular. also, i’m interested in attending Divine Liturgy in every Eastern Catholic Church in the lower mainland, doesn’t mean i’m switching rites.Or how about “If you haven’t attended a TLM, would you be interested?”
still not specific enough. asking about going again doesn’t ask about a commitment to going to the EF. it depends to what are you gauging. if its just interest and curiosity, this is a good enough question. if you want to know who’s willing to commit to the EF, this is a bad question because its so open endedOr “If you have attended, would you go again?”
best of the group. but for a real survey, how about this:Or even better, “All other things being equal, (given that the closest OF or EF is the same distance from you and at the same time), would you prefer the EF or OF?” Point is there are unlimited number of questions you could ask to make it more interesting for yourself.
didn’t i suggest to you in another thread that if you really want a TLM in your area, make a feasibility study and submit it to your bishop. they’re not going to respond to, “i want an EF mass, give it to us.” but if there’s a well studied, well thought of plan with the numbers that shows an EF mass will thrive in a certain parish, then i can’t see why the bishop will deny it. also, it helps that you did a lot of the research for them, also shows you are serious.Having had a mild interest in marketing myself, and as far as this particular poll goes, I would be interested in the “no” votes, regardless somewhat of the percentages. I would ask further of those, “Have you attended a TLM and would never go again?” or “Have you heard so many negative things about it, that you would never go, even if it were the closest Mass available?” If I knew this and if I were a priest or bishop, then I would be able to make some decisions as to whether I would say the TLM or study to learn how to say it.
you’re making the results of a inconclusive survey into something representative of what its not trying to representExactly what am I making up?
I’m not arguing against the TLM. I’m arguing against spurious use of statistics.There is nothing unfactual about my statement so I will repeat it. This thread was started with a polling question asking people if they would attend the TLM if offered. 75% say they would. That’s all you need to know. I didn’t claim 75% of all Catholics in the world think this way, only those who answered the poll.
Whether you like it or not there is significant interest in bringing the TLM back. You claim to have no problem with it yet find creative ways to argue against it.
If you think the surveys are inconclusive then that’s your choice. All I can do is present the numbers.you’re making the results of a inconclusive survey into something representative of what its not trying to represent
This is a good point. I know a lot of Catholics in my city who attend the TLM once a year to recall their roots and history, much like many Protestants attend a traditional “Founder’s Day” worship service at their church. But during the rest of the year, these Catholics attend their own OF Mass (and Protestants attend the Contemporary worship service).Also, take into account that some people who voted yes, like me, would just go once out of curiosity and potentially never go again. Just something else to keep in mind in a poll like this.![]()
Would you say the same if 90% of the votes were “no”?I’m not arguing against the TLM. I’m arguing against spurious use of statistics.
So the surveys I provided are spurious and inconclusive, but your ancedotal evidence is sound and binding on the rest of the world? Count the number of times you use the word “I” or “my” in your posts.This is a good point. I know a lot of Catholics in my city