How many of you non-Catholics think/believe...

  • Thread starter Thread starter PbloPicasso
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PbloPicasso

Guest
that life exists on other planets? Do you believe that we can reach those other worlds? If so, why?

I’m particularly interested in atheist and scientist perspectives retlated to traveling at speeds fast enough to reach other worlds.

Oh, the reason I said “non-Catholics” because we all know that Catholics will no doubt be likely to post first and most often.:rolleyes:
 
The reason I ask is simply because I’ve been working on the calculations. Just to reach the speed of light, if possible, would require nearly a year at 1 G-Force [1 times the pull of gravity of the eather]. I read that most people would pass out at 3 Gs. I read the record is about 47 Gs, from which certain medical issues resulted. It doesn’t seem possible for this to occur. Then there is the expense of energy required to reach such speeds. No matter what the technology, it appears that no one - including alien life formes - could reach the speed of light, much less travel the expanse of such enormous space in order to reach us.

I think this is a fascinating realization for me to figure out. It brings up the question how long has the universe existed, how was it formed, etc. God transcends time and space. And this seems to be the only way we could have come into existence. Science fails at explaining the reality of a real phenomena we call Creation. Statistically speaking it is implausible at best that we came into existence randomly.

Anyone else come to this realization yet?
 
I don’t think it would be possible to reach the speed of light. Because of motion an objects mass would increase as it got closer to the speed of light requiring more energy to go faster. E=mc2 where E is energy, m is mass and c is the speed of light. Increase one and it impacts the other. It’s a compounding problem, more energy means faster speed means increase in mass means more energy required. You would reach a point of infinite mass requiring infinite energy. Only light and other waves that don’t have intrinsic mass can reach the speed of light. I’m not a physicist but I do remember some things from Hawkin’s book 👍

To your question I think it depends by what you had in mind by life on other planets. I think it’s more than possible that single cell organisms exist on other planets. There may even be some in our own solar system in, for example, the clouds of Venus and under the ice of Jupiter’s moon Europa. Is there intelligent life out there? 🤷 I don’t know.

edit I just read your thread title a second time but understood it for the first. Sorry. Oh well you got my 2 cents anyways.

God bless
 
Well can a former non-catholic answer? 🙂

From the standpoint of reaching other planets. Yes it’s possible, but not practical in a human life time. The issue is that under general relativity as your velocity increases so does you mass. As velocities approach the speed of light their mass approaches infinity. To reach the speed of light you would have to push an infinitely large mass with an infinitely large force. Somewhere between 15 and 40% of the speed of light more and more of the energy applied to acceleration actually converts to mass. At best lets say you accelerate to 5% the speed of light even near planets are a good 80+ years away (not including acceleration and deceleration times). Our current technology can’t even come close to that speed without decades or centuries of constant acceleration. Better pack your jammies cause it’s going to be a loooong car ride. 😃

So what does this have to do with the price of alien kumquats on Alpha Centari?

I don’t think the size of the universe proves God, but I do agree the probability of us existing by mere chance is highly miniscule (I’m sure someone will bring up the anthropic principle to dispute this). That being said I also don’t agree with Hawking that there is no need for a God in physics. Maybe not, but that’s not the same as saying that there is no God.
 
Yes there is intelligent life on other planets, but we won’t reach them and they won’t seek us because their “Adam and Eve” didn’t fall and they are too busy living in God’s presence to worry about advancing technology and space travel.🤷 I think.
 
Yes, there is alien life. No, there are no alien kumquats.

We’ll not get to them for a long time. We may have to use wormholes or something.
 
Given the vastness of the Universe, I think the odds of intelligent life being out there somewhere are pretty good.

There’s no way we can reach those planets with our current technology. I have no idea if we’ll ever have the technology to make traversing these massive distances practical.
 
Well… I’m a non-Catholic who agrees with the Catholic view of science, that it does not conflict with faith. I reject YEC and am undecided between OEC and TE.

I’m also a life-long science-fiction fan.

I think that someday some kind of loop hole in the speed of light speed limit will be discovered, something that permits an FTL drive to be made. That’s more hope than science at this point, but at least the science doesn’t rule it out.

And I think there probably is life on other planets, maybe even sentient life. I don’t think God made all that real estate for no particular reason. On some of it, somebody lives there, or is going to live there someday.
 
Life on other planets is plausible. However, life on this planet seems more designed than accidental. The chances for all of the amino acids required for creating life is so improbible that the time this planet was created would seem infinite. I read that the probability for the randome creation of just one of the many amino acids required for life would by described as 10 to the 33 power blind men solving a rubriks cube simultaneous. This was described by an atheist. He believes there is some other better description, but didn’t or wouldn’t give credence to God for being the “mover” as we ofter hear God described as the Creator. The entire thing is very fascinating.

But, in order for a human being to reach the speed of light, I seriously doubt it at all. Play with the formulas. One thing I did not take into consideration in my calculations is the increase in energy and the increase in mass. That would be interesting to figure out on top of the current situation. Throwing a machine into that speed is more plausible because of the stress on inanimate objects compared to the complex vascular system of biological entities, particularly humans.

Can you tell I’ve been watching Star Trek? First time it got me thinking like this. I’m watching Netflix to catch up. Went through a tremendous soul searching, or God searching since next generation came out. The shows are soothing compared to the other shows. I like the music I guess. Great fantasy to travel at the speed of light. Warp 10 would bring you anywhere in the universe nearly instantaneously. This is what motivated me to calculate the time it would take at various G-Forces. Not very practical at all. But if we donated all of our paychecks to NASA, we just might make it their in a couple thousand years.😉

I tie in the concept that God transcends time and space. That means He’s not bound by the same limitations and explains how he can be everywhere. The entire thing about time is fascinating once you let your mind work on it. Imagine it. We describe the universe mostly using “years”, which is only applicable on this planet. To reach the speed of light it would take a year without stopping. Stopping would require starting from the beginning - reset the clock. I’ll be thinking about this for a while. Then I’ll find something more productive to do once I finish watching all of the Star Trek series available on Netflix right now. One interesting concept I thought about is that in order for a person to reach the speed of light the body would have to be demolecularized and remodularized once it reaches the destination, which seems more realistic that physically reaching the speed of light. Reality is suspended for now.😉
 
I think that there is likely to be life on planets orbiting other stars. I think that there will be no “cheat” around the speed of light, but that such cheating is not necessary to travel to other planets.

If conditions on Earth and technology advances allow it, we can reach another star in a reasonable timeframe by using a generational ship. People would be born, live, and die aboard this ship, which would need to travel only a fraction of the speed of light. We could reach other stars with planets in a few centuries, and if there is life there we will find it.
 
There is definitely life on other planets. Whether or not it is intelligent is another matter. And if intelligent, would we be able to communicate with it? Who knows.

Getting out of the solar system, outside of some sort of wormhole/spacefold/other sci-fi technology, is near impossible in one lifetime.
 
Getting out of the solar system, outside of some sort of wormhole/spacefold/other sci-fi technology, is near impossible in one lifetime.
It’s actually quite simple to get out of the solar system in one lifetime – the hard part is getting to another star. 🙂
 
Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier when it was believed impossible. To add to this interesting point, brag time… I worked with General Yeager’s daughter while in school. Yeager was my childhood hero. Dad was Air Force and a pilot. Star Trek represents the desire to go to the next level. Personally I hope that we discover properties change more than we suspect allowing light speed possible one day.
 
I like to believe we are not “'alone” in this universe. I like to believe that “somewhere” out there…other sentient beings would be asking the same question we were asking…
 
that life exists on other planets? Do you believe that we can reach those other worlds? If so, why?

I’m particularly interested in atheist and scientist perspectives retlated to traveling at speeds fast enough to reach other worlds.

Oh, the reason I said “non-Catholics” because we all know that Catholics will no doubt be likely to post first and most often.:rolleyes:
I like to think about this sort of thing. It’s a timely question because some recent experiments seem to have observed particles other than photons reaching the speed of light. These particles were neutrinos, however, neutrinos are rather curious little fellows anyway. Anyway, I don’t think that human kind will ever reach or exceed light speed, and Prof. Hawking pretty much proved that with his now famous dinner party experiment, which related more to time travel, but the implications are the same. Or at least he proved it to my satisfaction. Making it to distant places in the universe will in my opinion involve trans- dimensional travel, or some sort of quantum travel that is based on mind or conscious travel rather than physical. Carbon based beings with the same sensory limitations as ours would have to develop another level of consciousness to do that. I think we will evolve to that if we don’t destroy ourselves first. Carbon based sentient beings with similar sensory/brain function as our own will likely to be found travelling transcendentally and independently of physical limitation. In other words, you won’t have to go somewhere to know what is there. Whether that is via huge or yet unimagined telescopes or developed telepathy, it is all the same - both are the product of the human mind, and I hope we get there. I have no proof of any of this. These are just the musings of Sufjon’s mind, and I love to think about it.

I think that the probability of life on other planets is rather high mathematically, simply based on the enormity of the numbers involved. That said, one must also realize that humanity holds a rare place in the universe. We seem to be in the middle of things if one were to look at a scale of it all. Between the smallest particles and the largest objects such as suns, we are in the middle. We are on a mid size planet in a mid-size solar system within a mid size spiral galaxy. In the animal kingdom we are in the middle. Our bodies are just big enough to support the type of brain we have, but just small enough to avoid undue delay in signals from the brain to other sense organs. We are in a peculiar spot. Hence we are looking for beings in the same spot. That will be rare in one sense and plentiful in another. From a mathematical view, it’s plentiful – among trillions of stars in trillions of galaxies, if there was only one chance in a trillion of life elsewhere, that means there are trillions of them. From the perspective of matter, it’s rare. Most matter in the universe is dark matter, and the matter that we deal in with our senses is rare and mostly hydrogen and helium. Rarer still is carbon matter, which is made up of debris from dead stars, and this is what we are made of. As insignificant as we are in comparison with the titanic scale of the universe, we play an important role in it’s existence, and it is our consciousness that plays that role. Quantum mechanics insists that nothing exists without consciousness, or at least that’s how I read it. Nothing collapses into a reality unless observed by a conscious mind, therefore, physical reality is an epiphenomenon of mind, and since mind is brain, mind is also an epiphenomenon of the physical world. They are co-dependent, and It’s something of a tangled hierarchy or strange loop, unless one were to allow that sentience is dependent on consciousness, but that consciousness is independent of sentience and independent of all else as well. It makes sense to me then, that consciousness will be the vehicle by which we explore alien worlds, and the means by which aliens are exploring ours. At that level of awareness, there is no need to reach out to us or to interfere. To know is enough.

Meanwhile, we are defining the universe with our sense organs in the manner in which we are able. Other beings are probably defining it with other organs of consciousness or even sentience and perhaps defining on the level of dimensions that we are unable to comprehend. Together, these levels of awareness bestow the attributes on the physical universe that attend those levels of awareness. For us it’s sight, hearing, touch, taste and smell being fed into a central processing brain, and these create the universe on the level at which we perceive it, and perhaps this is unique to us. We look up on a clear day and say that the sky is blue. But that is only the effect of photons reflecting off of our retinas, fed into the optic nerve and then to the brain, which sees a sky that is blue. But if you were to float upwards, no matter how high you float, the sky is always above you. Then at some point you reach a spot where there is blackness all around you and the earth is below you. The sky was never reached, and at this point it becomes evident that not only is the sky not blue, there is really no sky. We created it. It’s an effect caused by our nervous system in reaction to a phenomenon outside of it and interacting with it. It depends on us for it’s existence. Will it ever be possible to share on some level the reality of other beings in some far off region of space whose sensory tool kit is nothing like our own? What universe have they created?

Your friend
Sujfon
 
I like to think about this sort of thing.** It’s a timely question because some recent experiments seem to have observed particles other than photons reaching the speed of light. **These particles were neutrinos, however, neutrinos are rather curious little fellows anyway. …

Making it to distant places in the universe will in my opinion involve trans- dimensional travel, or some sort of quantum travel that is based on mind or conscious travel rather than physical.

**
Meanwhile, we are defining the universe with our sense organs in the manner in which we are able. **…
Your friend
Sujfon
I read an article recently as well. So it is timely.

This second statement leads me to believe that you’ve been watching Dune, and maybe the first Series of Star Trek:Voyager

But for the third bold statement I isolated, I couldn’t help but imagine some new organ growing out of me… a sensor.🙂 Almost sounds R-Rated.😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top