Z
ZacharyM
Guest
Hello,
I know there has been significant debate over the relationship between John the Apostle, John the Evangelist, the Beloved Disciple, John the Presbyter and John of Patmos – are these all the same person, or two or more separate persons? Is there one such St. John or several?
From my reading it is clear that scholars are divided on this issue. But what I really wanted to know is whether the Church has made any official ruling on the matter? Or, is there a particular viewpoint most common with faithful Catholics? Or are Catholics free to believe whatever scholarship they prefer? I understand the majority position in the tradition of the Church (putting aside modern scholarship) is that they are the same person – does the Church require or recommend us to accept its tradition in this matter over the competing claims of some modern scholarship? (Is this matter part of “tradition” or part of “Tradition”? Is there a difference?)
Scholarship always seems so uncertain, with so many opinions and I don’t feel qualified to judge who is right. But I don’t feel comfortable with just leaving this question as “I don’t know” either. It seems too important to me.
Thanks
Zack
I know there has been significant debate over the relationship between John the Apostle, John the Evangelist, the Beloved Disciple, John the Presbyter and John of Patmos – are these all the same person, or two or more separate persons? Is there one such St. John or several?
From my reading it is clear that scholars are divided on this issue. But what I really wanted to know is whether the Church has made any official ruling on the matter? Or, is there a particular viewpoint most common with faithful Catholics? Or are Catholics free to believe whatever scholarship they prefer? I understand the majority position in the tradition of the Church (putting aside modern scholarship) is that they are the same person – does the Church require or recommend us to accept its tradition in this matter over the competing claims of some modern scholarship? (Is this matter part of “tradition” or part of “Tradition”? Is there a difference?)
Scholarship always seems so uncertain, with so many opinions and I don’t feel qualified to judge who is right. But I don’t feel comfortable with just leaving this question as “I don’t know” either. It seems too important to me.
Thanks
Zack