A
Andruschak
Guest
It seems that many miss the good old days of strenious fasting.
Of course, what is meant by “the good old days” can vary.
For those who are appalled by the fact that, in the USA, only 2 days a year are given to fasting, the good old days might be those of the 40 day fast, one big meal, and two smaller meals. With abstenance on Fridays. How many Catholics were able to actually endure such a fast is hard to estimate.
Yet interestingly enough, this 40 days fast was a easier version of the 19th Century fast. I have been reading what Dom Gueranger, in his work THE LITURGICAL YEAR, had to say about the 19th Century fast.“All the week days of Lent, the Ember days, and some vigils are days of fasting, but meat is allowed at the full meal except on Wednesdays and Fridays and the Ember days in Lent”.
Dom only mentions ONE other meal besides the main meal, not two. Well, Dom was writing about the laxness of the 19th Century.
For Dom, the good old days would have the original fast borrowed from the Jews, and still kept by Muslims even in the 21st Century. No food from sunrise to sunset, period. THAT was his idea of “traditional” fasting.
Dom notes that by the 12th Century, most were wimping out and having dinner at Nones (3 PM).By the 15th Century dinner was at noon. But now a small supper was needed to keep up strength in the evening, hence the further wimping out with the “collation” (just one).
Dom also notes the decline in strictness concerning milk products, eggs, and fish, to the point that meat was allowed most fasting days, except Wednesdays and Fridays. Tsk tsk.
Fascinating reading.
And now, what fast will you be doing this Lent?
(Mine will be the guidelines of The Confraternity of Penitents.)
penitents.org
Of course, what is meant by “the good old days” can vary.
For those who are appalled by the fact that, in the USA, only 2 days a year are given to fasting, the good old days might be those of the 40 day fast, one big meal, and two smaller meals. With abstenance on Fridays. How many Catholics were able to actually endure such a fast is hard to estimate.
Yet interestingly enough, this 40 days fast was a easier version of the 19th Century fast. I have been reading what Dom Gueranger, in his work THE LITURGICAL YEAR, had to say about the 19th Century fast.“All the week days of Lent, the Ember days, and some vigils are days of fasting, but meat is allowed at the full meal except on Wednesdays and Fridays and the Ember days in Lent”.
Dom only mentions ONE other meal besides the main meal, not two. Well, Dom was writing about the laxness of the 19th Century.
For Dom, the good old days would have the original fast borrowed from the Jews, and still kept by Muslims even in the 21st Century. No food from sunrise to sunset, period. THAT was his idea of “traditional” fasting.
Dom notes that by the 12th Century, most were wimping out and having dinner at Nones (3 PM).By the 15th Century dinner was at noon. But now a small supper was needed to keep up strength in the evening, hence the further wimping out with the “collation” (just one).
Dom also notes the decline in strictness concerning milk products, eggs, and fish, to the point that meat was allowed most fasting days, except Wednesdays and Fridays. Tsk tsk.
Fascinating reading.
And now, what fast will you be doing this Lent?
(Mine will be the guidelines of The Confraternity of Penitents.)
penitents.org
