S
shark76z
Guest
I know Catholics celebrate it daily, and Anglicans/Episcopalians and Lutherans celebrate it weekly, but what about other Protestant denominations (Baptist, Pentecostal, Methodist, etc.)?
Thanks

Thanks


That is why our name is “Catholic” which means Universal.Presbyterians are about once a month or once a season, not sure. Scott Hahn had his church celebrating every week… of course that was before he swam the TIber, but he had his toe in it.
Catholics, of course, celebrate it all the time. Most parishes offer daily masses throughout the week, and give the wonderful fact that there are 24 time zones and masses in every time zone, the Catholic Mass never ceases.
In fact, Christian denominations can not and do not celebrate the Eucharist.I know Catholics celebrate it daily, and Anglicans/Episcopalians and Lutherans celebrate it weekly, but what about other Protestant denominations (Baptist, Pentecostal, Methodist, etc.)?
Thanks
![]()
Various Protestant groups hold their communion services at different times.In fact, Christian denominations can not and do not celebrate the Eucharist.
They lack the priesthood that is capable of celebrating the Eucharist.
Exactly right.In fact, Christian denominations can not and do not celebrate the Eucharist.
They lack the priesthood that is capable of celebrating the Eucharist.
That is a very good question that I also would like to know the answers to.How often do Christian denominations celebrate the Eucharist?
Haha the Church was Catholic long before she spread into all those time zones, I think.That is why our name is “Catholic” which means Universal.![]()
I bet the person your signature quotes would have disagreed.Never. No mere denomination has the Eucharist.
I’ve never seen Lewis’s stance on the Real Presence, have you? And how would it be relevant to the discussion, as he was an Anglican?I bet the person your signature quotes would have disagreed.![]()
Unless I misunderstood you, you had said that non-Catholic denominations like the Church of England do not have a “valid” Eucharist, regardless of what their members might believe. So I was just pointing out the irony of you quoting C.S.Lewis in your signature while making a statement so dismissive of his church.I’ve never seen Lewis’s stance on the Real Presence, have you? And how would it be relevant to the discussion, as he was an Anglican?
How is it ironic that I could agree with Lewis (after whom, incidentally, I named one of my sons) on most of what he believed and taught, but not on everything? Must we agree fully with every author before we can admire or quote them?Unless I misunderstood you, you had said that non-Catholic denominations like the Church of England do not have a “valid” Eucharist, regardless of what their members might believe. So I was just pointing out the irony of you quoting C.S.Lewis in your signature while making a statement so dismissive of his church.