How often is atheism a response to pain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fnr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do you assume atheists believe life is meaningless?
I’m always curious about this kind of statement. I’ve never believed in a god, but my life has plenty of meaning. Also, the idea that atheists “choose darkness” is interesting to me, because I never really made a choice. As I said, I’ve never believed in anything, which surely must be a precursor to reject it.

Lou
 
I’m always curious about this kind of statement. I’ve never believed in a god, but my life has plenty of meaning. Also, the idea that atheists “choose darkness” is interesting to me, because I never really made a choice. As I said, I’ve never believed in anything, which surely must be a precursor to reject it.

Lou
Also a good point we would all do well to keep in mind as the number of never churched increases with every generation. To reject faith in religion, in God, etc… you had to have had it in the first place. Many atheists never had such faith in higher powers as they were not raised to believe. And as they raise their own kids, etc… that generation will be even further removed from religion.
 
Why do you assume atheists believe life is meaningless?
Isn’t meaning somewhat overrated anyhow? Something can have a meaning and be of no value, like graffiti on a wall; whereas something that doesn’t “mean” anything per se can be beyond price, like a bodyful of breath, or a ray of light on the eyes.

Human life is its own reward. Any meaning to be teased out of it is secondary.

ICXC NIKA
 
I’m always curious about this kind of statement. I’ve never believed in a god, but my life has plenty of meaning. Also, the idea that atheists “choose darkness” is interesting to me, because I never really made a choice. As I said, I’ve never believed in anything, which surely must be a precursor to reject it.

Lou
"He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. “This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil.” John 3: 18-19
 
Because a life lived without Christ is meaningless.
Ah, but that’s not what you said in the post I asked the question based on. You implied that Atheists believe life is random and meaningless (which I’ve never found to be true even among the most fervent atheists I know)… not that some Christians believe that Atheists lives are meaningless. Not that I agree with your more recent assertion, nor does your own Catechism or pope if I’m not mistaken.
 
Because a life lived without Christ is meaningless.
"He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. “This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil.” John 3: 18-19
You appear to be arguing that all atheists make a conscious decision to not believe in a god, and that all make the decision to reject one. However, as I have said, I never believed in a god in the first place. I’ve never made a choice, I’ve never rejected anything. Despite this, my life isn’t meaningless at all. And surely, rejection of a god implies that the person believed in one, once upon a time?

As Padres said, you implied in your first post that Atheists go through life “believing that it’s all meaningless and random”, but in the above posts you’re using a Christian viewpoint to argue it. I’ve never heard any Atheist say their life is meaningless. It may appear so from your perspective because they don’t share the same beliefs as you, but that doesn’t mean that it’s what Atheists really think.

Lou
 
What on Earth do you think Christian evangelization is!!?

Endless, circular debate with atheists in which Jesus Christ is never even named, even once, is what often seems to pass for “evangelism” here on CAF.

So here it is, in plain English:
Repent! For the Kingdom of God is at hand!

And–there is no true happiness, no real meaning, no truth and no salvation except in Jesus Christ.
 
For me personally, there was no emotional trauma that lead to atheism. Religion just gradually stopped making sense to me.

But perhaps emotional pain or suffering can lead to one reconsidering their current ideology? Perhaps it didn’t cause them to change but instead caused the to consider reevaluating things and exposed underlying issues that were previously ignored, if that makes any sense.
Well, there is that saying that there are no atheists in foxholes. Don’t know if that is taken way out of context, but one will always see it touted as reason to believe in God. Maybe it just means people take the Lord’s name in vain anytime they are in a dire life and death circumstance… I dunno!
Code:
 I have a good friend (we grew up together) who is an atheist and she's said to me that she wishes sometimes that she could believe in God but that she just doesn't, that she suspects it must be a good thing that sometimes she wishes she had.    And funny enough (because spiritual life is not always easy) I said to her that I sometimes envy her position.
I don’t think anyone in this life gets away with not having their fair share of challenges and hardships in trying to learn and perceive that age old question “what is truth?”
 
Well, there is that saying that there are no atheists in foxholes. Don’t know if that is taken way out of context, but one will always see it touted as reason to believe in God. Maybe it just means people take the Lord’s name in vain anytime they are in a dire life and death circumstance… I dunno!
Code:
 I have a good friend (we grew up together) who is an atheist and she's said to me that she wishes sometimes that she could believe in God but that she just doesn't, that she suspects it must be a good thing that sometimes she wishes she had.    And funny enough (because spiritual life is not always easy) I said to her that I sometimes envy her position.
I don’t think anyone in this life gets away with not having their fair share of challenges and hardships in trying to learn and perceive that age old question “what is truth?”
Scripture tells us that God draws those He wants to save. However, there’s no schedule, no timeline as to when in one’s life this happens. Some are earlier, some later. So perhaps your good friend will be drawn, and it’s great that you’re there for her when and if that happens. And if it doesn’t happen, it certainly won’t be your fault. It’s in God’s hands. If He wants her, He will have her.
 
An atheist, by the way, doesn’t necessarily have a “materialistic” view of the world. They just don’t see evidence that any gods exist.
Materialism and atheism don’t always go together.
Could you explain how that works?
Thanks
 
Well, when you encounter an atheist that has … let’s say, “anger issues” it can lead a person to wonder why there is so much hostility.
 
I read people on this site say this a lot–so much so, that I often wonder if this is what theists are told by priests and pastors and the like.
Because no atheist I know has ever given the above one thought. This has never been a motive of any of the hundreds of atheists I know.
.
No atheist you know has given a thought to what will happen after death?
Well, actually - that would support the very point you’re objecting to. A desire to escape accountability. If there’s no God, then no Judgement.
Make sense?
 
Yikes.

Yeah, I’ll be staying atheist…

.[/Q*
UOTE]

Which you’re free to do. Following Jesus Christ–really following Him-- is the narrow path. It does require repentance. And it requires worshipping Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and realizing that He is the only means of salvation. Anyone who tells you otherwise isn’t really a Christian, or isn’t being honest with you.

Which begs the question–if atheism is so fulfilling, why are you and other unbelievers here? I don’t visit atheist forums, myself, yet a number of atheists seem to need to be here. And that is…interesting.
 
A materialistic is one who believes that we are only of the physical realm, yes?
Yes. Everything that exists is matter, natural laws, physical forces - just physical nature. There is no supernature. There is nothing that did not come from molecules.
But just because a person doesn’t believe in a god or gods, it doesn’t mean they can’t believe there is a realm beyond the physical.
An atheist can believe in the spirit and in the supernatural. They just don’t believe in gods. There’s no law or rule that those things can exist without gods.
.
Ok, yes - but where did this spirit world come from? Are there spirits living there? Where are they? how many? What do they do? What powers do they have? How did they get there? What causes them to survive and live? Why are they there? How do they interact with humans on earth?

So, sure - we can just say there are spirits but that opens a lot of questions.
Those spirits and the spirit-world had to come from somewhere. They can’t come from materialism. That’s the problem.

Actually, I think what you’re saying is a lot better than just materialism – but also, I think you’re on a path to accepting that there are “gods” of some kind, since these spirits you’re talking about can have all kinds of powers, can affect the earth and human life in some way. That’s exactly what it was believed pagan gods did (and gods of Buddhism and Hinduism today do). Gods of Mormonism do the same - they’re human spirits.
So, unless you have some other explanation - then you would believe in gods of some kind.
 
Yes…but the other poster was saying that “leading atheists” supposedly had difficulties with their fathers.

I’m wondering…which leading atheists the author of Case for Christ (or the book you cite) is thinking of.
.
I was going to write something but I actually searched the book and got a clip - just for you. 🙂
By studying the lives of numerous famous atheists, from the old atheists Nietzsche, Sartre, and Freud to the new atheists Hitchens, Dawkins, and Dennet, Vitz discovers a startling common pattern: atheism arises in people with dead, absent, or abusive fathers.
amazon.com/Faith-Fatherless-Psychology-Paul-Vitz/dp/1586176870
 
No. If you take another look at my post, I was responding directly to this:

Originally Posted by Mary Estelle 
I don’t know; Atheism seem to be an easy way out of holding one’s self accountable to the Lord.
I wasn’t saying anything about what will happen after death.

And there can of course be judgement without god. A person can be their own judge.
Ok but the point by Mary E is avoidance of holding oneself accountable to the Lord.
If there is nothing after death, then there is no accoutability to anyone – not to the Lord, not to themselves or anyone else.
Now you seem to be saying that after death, a person is their own judge? Where does this judgement take place?
How does one determine, in justice, the cost and repayment required for all of the sins of their entire life? How can a person pay all of that back after their dead?
 
I was going to write something but I actually searched the book and got a clip - just for you. 🙂
That quote doesn’t surprise me. To be a Christian requres total surrender to God. The ultimate authority.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top