It’s important when you see these riots to remember that in many Middle Eastern countries, it would be impossible for someone to make a film without the approval of the authorities, so it is natural for people in these places to think that the US government approved it. That suits the ideology of a small group, who then whip up emotion to the point where a riot breaks out.
That does not excuse the riots in any way and certainly doesn’t give anyone the right to kill. I am simply trying to explain why the protestors are attacking the US (and other Western) embassies.
Just as the writer of the article in the link can’t understand a country with laws or values different to his own, condemning them for not being like the US, so the people in those countries cannot understand why the US doesn’t have their blasphemy laws. Is the writer of that article really so different from those he criticises? Given a crowd of people with his mindset and a small group who want to cause trouble, a riot of this magnitude would be possible anywhere. There were riots in the UK last summer, this summer we hosted an Olympics noted for its friendly welcome and enthusiastic support for athletes from all countries. It can happen anywhere.
I think that Free Speech gives you the right to say what you wish, but it also places on you the responsibility for the consequences of what you say. The people who were involved in making and interpreting this film knew full well the likely response in the Muslim world. It was deliberate provocation. If they want the right to say this, they should also have the courage to stand up and say who they are, not hide behind the anonymity of the internet.