How should we interpret the gospels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul1998
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Paul1998

Guest
I was reading today the pontifical biblical comition document called ,the interpretation of the Bible in the church", and in the first part it explains different methods of interpretation used to understand the sacred scriptures, including the historical-critical, hermeneutical and fundamentalist methods. I understand that we have to read the old testament in a historical-critical and hermeneutical way (to acknowledge that lots of passages were written allegorically or metaphorical and were never ment to be taken word by word) but what about the gospels? Doesn’t the same thing apply here? How should interpret the institution of the Eucharist for example? We take it word by word, but why?
My big question here is how do we know what to interpret in a historical-critical /hermeneutical way and what to understand in the fundamentalist way…
 
Last edited:
A lot of it has to do with understanding Scripture in light of the Church’s historical understanding. In many cases Scripture simply cannot be understood apart from the Church whose early members created it and who was “there” from the beginning. Remember that the Church basically received and proclaimed the gospel before a word of the New Testament was written. To better answer your question, research the catechism here:
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s1c2a2.htm
and through to the following article:
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s1c2a3.htm
 
Last edited:
The document from the PBC that you refer to says that there is no one method that can be used for understanding scripture, but that often a combination of viewpoints may be enlightening.

One of its recommendations, you should remember, is to read scripture alongside a commentary. So, which commentary to use, you’re wondering.

First, it’s important to be familiar with the catechism of the catholic church (CCC). This present the faith more in a topical, logical fashion, with many references to the Bible. But, it is not itself an exhaustive commentary on the Bible.

John Bergsma and Brant Pitre have just had The Catholic Introduction to the Bible: Old Testament published by Ignatius. I’m almost finished reading its 970 pages. It is an excellent introduction and has lists of books for further reading. There is no word yet as to when they may publish the second volume on the New Testament. (I also notice that they use the RSV-2CE edition of the Bible from Ignatius Press – it has different verses than my old NAB.)

Commentaries are more thorough than study Bibles, in that they expand more on the text, usually one book at a time. A recent series that is worthwhile is the Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture series from Baker Academic.

I haven’t found any commentary that answers all my questions. You just have “to jump into the pool” with the rest of us and start reading. You have to think “budget” here and how much it is worth to you. I’m sure I’m past the $3,000 level of spending on books. Proceed slowly and selectively. I use The Jewish Study Bible, 2nd Ed, Oxford Press for a different translation; this volumes has 400 pages of essays on the Jewish scriptures.

My local public library has The New Interpreter’s Bible ← I think that’s the title. My study Bible etc. and the CCC doesn’t have a good definition or discussion of “prophecy” (see 1 Co 14 ), so I went to that series for a good discussion.

Catholic study Bibles often have references to Jewish and Protestant books and articles for further study. You should keep in mind that they have a different point of view – and that’s what you may want, once in a while.
 
Last edited:
All the law and the prophets of God hang and depend on the greatest commandments. How does anything I read in the Bible help me understand; how to love God and my neighbour?

Jesus would have lived by these commandments, he could do nothing greater. but how did Jesus love all his neighbours as he loves himself? How did Jesus hold his hands out on the cross and love the man with the hammer?

I know that my sins also helped condemn Jesus. If Jesus died for me and for you, it must mean that he loves us as much as he loves himself.
 
My big question here is how do we know what to interpret in a historical-critical /hermeneutical way and what to understand in the fundamentalist way…
We don’t interpret; the Church interprets and teaches us. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top