How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization

  • Thread starter Thread starter Snow
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
While the Catholic Church has, no doubt, contributed to Western Civilization in huge ways, it would be more honest and intellectually honest to say that the Protestant Reformation shaped the Western World in a greater way.

The Roman Catholic Church suppressed secular science, secular art, secular literature, and exploration of ideas outside of religion in general. It wasn’t until Luther came along that Europeans discovered they had religious freedom of choice. With that came the idea that secular is not necessarily a dirty word. Sciences flourished, artwork for the first time could express daily living, literature and poetry took off like wild fire, and the rise of nations came out of the disordered chaos of the Middle Ages. We have the protestants to thank for the idea of nationalism, resurrecting democracy from the Greeks, seperating church and state, the Bill of Rights, the American Revolution, the French Revolution, on and on. Without the Reformation, none of these things would have nor could have taken place.

Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, Mark Twain, Thomas Payne, and Abraham Lincoln would have been burned at the stake for the many things they said about the Church, criticisms of the Bible, and personal opinions they had theologically. I happen to disagree a great deal with the crazy deism of Thomas Jefferson, the cynical and doubtful thoughts Franklin had about the miracles of Christ, and the downright heretical thoughts of John Adams! Mark Twain was a real cynic and believed very little of scripture. He thought that Christianity was best kept in a museum. HOWEVER, what if these men, who happen to have been theologically pretty crazy, had not been born? They contributed in huge ways to our Western society. Only the Reformation could have given them a safe place to express their talents and their flawed views.

Western Civilization was also hugely influenced by the Greeks and Romans, both pagan cultures, more than by the Roman Catholic Church. Our ideas of warfare (read all the books of Dr. Victor Davis Hanson) and strategies are mostly Greek in nature. Our capitalistic enterprises inspired by Athens. Our republican government inspired by Rome (republic period).

Western Civilization has inherited many religious ideas from the Catholic Church but many of the things the West actually discarded from Rome are what made her great.
 
Was it now? Or was it astrology that included graphing star charts?

I doubt they had astrophysics back then 🤷
Actually they did. Lot’s of monuments like Stonehenge appear to serve as calendars of various sorts.
 
So Jesus, being God, never died? Might want to inform the Vatican of this rather startling bit of information.
Nobody said Jesus did not die.

But that’s a topic for another thread.
 
Actually they did. Lot’s of monuments like Stonehenge appear to serve as calendars of various sorts.
Charting the movement of the stars is not the same as understanding the physics behind it. We should never assume that the people of the past were dumber than we are, but that does not mean that they were smarter, either.
 
If that writer is correct that means that catholicism is the cause of the downfall of the western society
 
Not to nitpick the original list but Astronomy was around for thousands of years before Jesus was even a gleam in his daddy’s eye.
The claim is not that the RCC invented astronomy, but rather made significant contributions to the field:

“Catholic cathedrals in Bologna, Florence, Paris, and Rome were constructed to function as solar observatories. No more precise instruments for observing the sun’s apparent motion could be found anywhere in the world. When Johannes Kepler posited that planetary orbits were elliptical rather than circular, Catholic astronomer Giovanni Cassini verified Kepler’s position through observations he made in the Basilica of San Petronio in the heart of the Papal States. Cassini, incidentally, was a student of Fr. Riccioli and Fr. Francesco Grimaldi, the great astronomer who also discovered the diffraction of light, and even gave the phenomenon its name.”

storialibera.it/attualita/occidente/thomas_e_woods/articolo.php?id=2302
 
The claim is not that the RCC invented astronomy, but rather made significant contributions to the field:

“Catholic cathedrals in Bologna, Florence, Paris, and Rome were constructed to function as solar observatories. No more precise instruments for observing the sun’s apparent motion could be found anywhere in the world. When Johannes Kepler posited that planetary orbits were elliptical rather than circular, Catholic astronomer Giovanni Cassini verified Kepler’s position through observations he made in the Basilica of San Petronio in the heart of the Papal States. Cassini, incidentally, was a student of Fr. Riccioli and Fr. Francesco Grimaldi, the great astronomer who also discovered the diffraction of light, and even gave the phenomenon its name.”

storialibera.it/attualita/occidente/thomas_e_woods/articolo.php?id=2302
I read somewhere that 35 craters on the moon are named for Jesuit astronomers and that in the 16th & 17th centuries astronomy was known as “the Jesuit science.”
 
Because that means they are the start of calling church a building and saying we need to meet there and support the building, they would also be responsible for the church being lukewarm. Also their failure to reach Russia before communism, etc.
 
Because that means they are the start of calling church a building and saying we need to meet there and support the building, they would also be responsible for the church being lukewarm. Also their failure to reach Russia before communism, etc.
What is this in response to?

Who calls the Church a “building”? There are buildings we call churches because they are places where members of the Church meet. Who limits the word “church” to meanng a building? Not Catholics, for sure.

As for the failure to reach Russia before communism – that is a highly tangential issue. Russia was evangelized before the 11th Century. Christianity was strong there UNTIL Communism. They used to call the place “Holy Russia.”
 
What is this in response to?

Who calls the Church a “building”? There are buildings we call churches because they are places where members of the Church meet. Who limits the word “church” to meanng a building? Not Catholics, for sure.

As for the failure to reach Russia before communism – that is a highly tangential issue. Russia was evangelized before the 11th Century. Christianity was strong there UNTIL Communism. They used to call the place “Holy Russia.”
And even under communist control, the Russian Orthodox survived. In fact, even Stalin at his worst could not destroy them.

To say that Russia was not evangelized is at best historically false. At worse, it is an outright lie.
 
Because that means they are the start of calling church a building and saying we need to meet there and support the building, they would also be responsible for the church being lukewarm. Also their failure to reach Russia before communism, etc.
Church is not a building, however corporate worship needs could no longer be accomodated in a person’s home. 🙂 This is a good thing! Christianity grew and grew inspite of intense persecution.
We do need to meet as a corporate body, remember paul chastising a community he helped get off the ground?
How he saw them “giving up on meeting together, and prayers” (give me a minute to grab the exact verse and chapter for you.
He did not like that they had done that.
The body of believers can’t be held responsible for anyone who decides of their own free will to be lukewarm. Please don’t say that all catholics are lukewarm, I hope that was not what you meant? I can’t tell what you meant really.
Russia had christianity before communism, and as Ralphinal notes it never died. Please, don’t ever say this to an eastern orthodox, I am guessing they will be highly offended by your assesment.😊
I am sure you feel sad that there are lukewarm christians, but you can’t declare that the root cause and responsibility for it is the catholic church. That’s just not right.😦
 
Yes, Russia did have plenty of missionaries building church buildings, or hospitals, or orphanages, but not building the actually church (the people). Within ten year Communism to over what Catholics were trying to do for hundreds of years. Yes the orthodoxy was around during communism, it was controlled by the Russian government for two purposes the find the underground church, and to look good to other countries specifically the west. almost 160,000 christians were martyred over there every year.

What I said in that was in response to an earlier post, I guess at the most I was trying to arise some questioning. I know that not all are lukewarm.
 
Yes, Russia did have plenty of missionaries building church buildings, or hospitals, or orphanages, but not building the actually church (the people). Within ten year Communism to over what Catholics were trying to do for hundreds of years. Yes the orthodoxy was around during communism, it was controlled by the Russian government for two purposes the find the underground church, and to look good to other countries specifically the west. almost 160,000 christians were martyred over there every year.

What I said in that was in response to an earlier post, I guess at the most I was trying to arise some questioning. I know that not all are lukewarm.
English isn’t your first language is it?

I know a lot of Russian Orthodox who would pull your ears for suggesting that their faith was a sham “to look good to the West.” Whatever the role of the government might have been, the conduct of the Imperial family during their imprisonment was a model of Christian forbearance.
 
Why dont you talk to some of those that were imprisoned because of their faith, in fact I know a free book you can get online called “tortured for Christ” it may enlighten you
 
Why dont you talk to some of those that were imprisoned because of their faith, in fact I know a free book you can get online called “tortured for Christ” it may enlighten you
No one will deny that there were martyrs in Soviet Russia. What we dispute is that there were no Christians there or that the message was never brought to Russia.

Tradition tells us that it was an apostle who first brought the faith to Russia. History tells us that Russia was Christian about the same time Europe was.

Unless you deny that Catholics and Orthodox are Christians
 
Because that means they are the start of calling church a building and saying we need to meet there and support the building, they would also be responsible for the church being lukewarm. Also their failure to reach Russia before communism, etc.
Which is it - Intellectual Dishonesty or Ignorance of History? Neither will get you anywhere with Catholics who are mostly well educated. Inform yourself, then perhaps you won’t look so silly. You might try a library…Robin
of the Wichita Hood
 
I don’t know if you have heard of How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization by Thomas E. Woods Jr. PhD.

The premise of the book is that the what we learned in schools - that the middle ages were the dark ages, full of ignorance and suppression, not in the least part maintained by the Catholic Church - is false, and not just false but wholly and completely false. The author tells us that contrary to what we think, in fact, it is the Catholic Church that is responsible for all/much that is good and right in the modern world. He writes that the Church formed or originated:

-Western Art
-Western Music
-Modern Economics
-International Law
-Western Law
-Charity
-Hospitals
-Astronomy
-Higher Education
-Science
-and so on
-and so on
-and on and on.

Occasionally he’ll making a passing observation that the Catholic Church was less than 100% perfect but, you know, the rest is so great that all Western civilization is their doing.

First, I found the book very informative. I picked up lots of facts and a perspective I didn’t have before. However I thought it was less a book and for the most part more an awfully long list of all the many wonderful things the author could dig up.

Second, I think it is disputable that everything on the list belongs on the list. For example he attributes the University system in general and Oxford in particular to the Catholic Church. I think the Greeks were onto higher learning long before the Catholics and the Oxford website paints a different history than does the author.

Third, every one and their dog was Catholic. Of course most things, good or bad, had to arise from under the Catholic umbrella.

I don’t think the book is too balanced and certainly is a homer’s / apologist’s dream but I do recommend it to learn new things and get a different perspective, especially if you are not Catholic.

Western Civilization isn’t perfect but it’s the best we have (imho) and we owe the Catholic Church much.
Has anyone heard of the books:
  • Ireland and the Foundations of Europe
  • Ireland and the making of Britain
both books by Benedict Fitzpatrick

The contribution of Ireland both socially and the spreading of Christianity is monumental. I was educated by Irish nuns and they were so dedicated and wonderful. I am very biased towards them and I always say I must have an Irish rib. Their dedication and sacrifice is something we should never forget.

I myself am of French stock but I take my hat off to the Irish:tiphat: :tiphat:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top