How to answer Protestants' "saving faith"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abrahamvllera
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

abrahamvllera

Guest
Protestants explain away 1 Cor 13:2 by the “saving faith” route, the same route they take in explaining James 2:24: good works is evidence of faith, but good works, by itself, has absolutely got nothing to do with salvation, faith alone has.:confused:
 
Protestants explain away 1 Cor 13:2 by the “saving faith” route, the same route they take in explaining James 2:24: good works is evidence of faith, but good works, by itself, has absolutely got nothing to do with salvation, faith alone has.:confused:
So I think the non-Catholic Christian argument here is that there are passages in Scripture that discuss saving faith (usually St. Paul’s writings), and there are passages that don’t really fit this mold and are described as a purifying or justifying faith, but not a saving one (typically explains James’ writing). I’ve heard it put this way; I think this is the same argument you are explaining, except that St. Paul’s writings are usually upheld as preachign the ‘saving faith’. So that’s interesting, but the defense is the same.

In both of their writings, St. Paul and St. James reference the faith of Abraham as recorded in Gen. 15:6. St. Paul does it in Romans 4:3, and St. James does it in James 2:23. But it would seem that there is no compromise on this issue: one’s faith is either saving or not, there is no ‘almost saved’ or something else. So did the same person really possess these two diametrically opposed faiths?

To say that they are talking about different kinds of faiths (St Paul’s ‘saving faith’ vs St. James’ ‘justifying, or purifying faith’) is to disagree with the little cross-reference numbers in the footnotes that reference the above passages. This distinction is not found in Scripture, and it is not supported by Scripture taken in context.
 
Are we saved by faith alone?

Don’t we need good works in order to be saved?

Does faith produce good works?

What is saving faith?
 
Hi! I’d like to point out Matthew 16:27-28. In this passage, Jesus gives us that wonderful paradox, “…anyone who loses his life for my sake will find it.” After this, however, he says something equally important: “For the Son of man is going to come in the glory of his Father with his angels, and then he will reward each one according to his behaviour.” Notice he stresses a reward based on one’s behavior, not simply on one’s faith.

Remember also when Jesus says, “Why do you call me Lord, Lord, and not do what I say?” (Luke 6:46-49) Again, here is the emphasis on actions to back up one’s faith. Those who call him “Lord, Lord” certainly have faith, but they do not back up that faith with good works. Then he goes on to compare these people to those who build their house on sand, not on a solid foundation, such as rock. (Here’s an interesting connection: remember the Lord saying that Peter was the rock, upon which He would build His church?!)

Also, remember when Jesus taught about the last judgment: those who fed the hungry, clothed the naked, gave drink to the thirsty etc. were the ones welcomed into the Kingdom, while those who did not, were sent to eternal punishment. (Matt.25:31-46)

Hope this helps!

Peace and Blessings,
Terrysa
 
40.png
abrahamvllera:
Protestants explain away 1 Cor 13:2 by the “saving faith” route, the same route they take in explaining James 2:24: good works is evidence of faith, but good works, by itself, has absolutely got nothing to do with salvation, faith alone has.
I don’t think I’ve ever heard this argument. Exactly how does 1 Cor 13:2 refer to “saving faith”?

In regard to the “faith alone” question, St Paul tells us in Romans 14:23 “… For all that is not of faith is sin.” (DR), and in 2 Cor 5:7 he says, “(For we walk by faith, and not by sight.)” (DR). Heb 11:6 says, “But without faith it is impossible to please God. For he that cometh to God, must believe that he is, and is a rewarder to them that seek him.” (DR) I suggest that these verses show that faith is required, and actually precedes good works (how can you do a work pleasing to God if it is not done by faith?). Since faith is a gift from God, what does that say about salvation?
 
I don’t think I’ve ever heard this argument. Exactly how does 1 Cor 13:2 refer to “saving faith”?

In regard to the “faith alone” question, St Paul tells us in Romans 14:23 “… For all that is not of faith is sin.” (DR), and in 2 Cor 5:7 he says, “(For we walk by faith, and not by sight.)” (DR). Heb 11:6 says, “But without faith it is impossible to please God. For he that cometh to God, must believe that he is, and is a rewarder to them that seek him.” (DR) I suggest that these verses show that faith is required, and actually precedes good works (how can you do a work pleasing to God if it is not done by faith?). Since faith is a gift from God, what does that say about salvation?
According to Catholicism, faith precedes good works. 🙂

God Bless,
Michael
 
40.png
mikeledes:
According to Catholicism, faith precedes good works.
So tell me, what was your faith like when you were baptized? For myself, I believe I can honestly say I didn’t have faith in anything when I was baptized in “the Church” (I was just a baby). However, once God brought me out of Catholicism, I exercised my faith in Jesus Christ and was baptized correctly. Just curious, when did you first acknowledge faith in Jesus Christ (actually know and believe in Him, not just repeat back words or prayers you had been taught)?
 
So tell me, what was your faith like when you were baptized? For myself, I believe I can honestly say I didn’t have faith in anything when I was baptized in “the Church” (I was just a baby). However, once God brought me out of Catholicism, I exercised my faith in Jesus Christ and was baptized correctly. Just curious, when did you first acknowledge faith in Jesus Christ (actually know and believe in Him, not just repeat back words or prayers you had been taught)?
It was quite strong, thank God. I was baptized when I was 18. I praise and thank God that He led me into His Church and feel very blessed. 🙂

God Bless,
Michael
 
However, once God brought me out of Catholicism, I exercised my faith in Jesus Christ and was baptized correctly.
“Exercised your faith?” How is that not a work?

Or to quote our dear departed brother Rich Mullins (who, incidentally, I call “brother” although I share no DNA with him)😉
“Faith without works-it just ain’t happening”
 
40.png
NHInsider:
“Exercised your faith?” How is that not a work?
Of course it’s a work. However, it isn’t a “good” work unless it’s done in faith (remember Romans 14:23, “… For all that is not of faith is sin.”). When I was baptized as a child, I had no faith in God, Jesus, or anything else. How can I be credited with doing a good work? However, once I received faith from God, I was able to discern that I needed to be baptized properly (through my own faith in Jesus Christ), which is what I did. If not for faith, I would never have been able to do anything pleasing to God (“But without faith it is impossible to please God. For he that cometh to God, must believe that he is, and is a rewarder to them that seek him.” Heb 11:6 DR). Can you show me a place where works are commended and faith is absent?
 
Of course it’s a work. However, it isn’t a “good” work unless it’s done in faith
Sounds like you agree with the Catechism:***CCC#1821 *We can therefore hope in the glory of heaven promised by God to those who love him and do his will. In every circumstance, each one of us should hope, with the grace of God, to persevere “to the end” and to obtain the joy of heaven, as God’s eternal reward for the good works accomplished with the grace of Christ.
 
40.png
MarcoPolo:
Sounds like you agree with the Catechism:
I do not agree with baptizing babies (should be obvious from my example). There are a number of other areas where I strongly disagree with the Catechism, but that isn’t the topic of this thread.
 
I do not agree with baptizing babies (should be obvious from my example). There are a number of other areas where I strongly disagree with the Catechism, but that isn’t the topic of this thread.
I wasn’t suggesting that. I was saying you agree with the Catechism regarding how works have value.
 
Protestants explain away 1 Cor 13:2 by the “saving faith” route, the same route they take in explaining James 2:24: good works is evidence of faith, but good works, by itself, has absolutely got nothing to do with salvation, faith alone has.:confused:
This is nonsensical. If something is evidence of X then it is false to say it has nothing to do with X, for it has just been stated that it does have something to do with X.

So many Protestants spend so much time tying themselves in knots over this, and for what reason?
 
The Protestants say that the works argument is taken out of context, a favorite trick for the apologist. That’s nonsense. The context makes it more certain rather than less that at least the Book of James is talking about works being a requirement for salvation.

Mr. Sole Fide himself, Martin Luther obviously knew the problem because he wanted to take the whole Book of James out of the cannon.
 
So tell me, what was your faith like when you were baptized? For myself, I believe I can honestly say I didn’t have faith in anything when I was baptized in “the Church” (I was just a baby).
Is it your position that babies who die cannot enter heaven? For, as you claim, they do not have faith.
 
Of course it’s a work. However, it isn’t a “good” work unless it’s done in faith (remember Romans 14:23, “… For all that is not of faith is sin.”). When I was baptized as a child, I had no faith in God, Jesus, or anything else. How can I be credited with doing a good work? However, once I received faith from God, I was able to discern that I needed to be baptized properly (through my own faith in Jesus Christ), which is what I did. If not for faith, I would never have been able to do anything pleasing to God (“But without faith it is impossible to please God. For he that cometh to God, must believe that he is, and is a rewarder to them that seek him.” Heb 11:6 DR). Can you show me a place where works are commended and faith is absent?
And who said Catholicism teaches that a baptized baby is credited with a good work? And I also ask the same question VociMike asks you: you believe all infants that die go to hell?

God Bless,
Michael
 
40.png
VociMike:
Is it your position that babies who die cannot enter heaven? For, as you claim, they do not have faith.
2 Sam 12:23 says, "But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me. " (emphasis mine). I believe God is merciful and has a plan and purpose for everything. As I understand 2 Sam 12:23, David will join his son when he dies and goes to be with the Lord (in Heaven). Do you think every unbaptized baby goes to hell? What hope did they have before Jesus commissioned the Apostles? What, in Scripture, makes you think unbaptized babies go to hell?
40.png
mikeledes:
And who said Catholicism teaches that a baptized baby is credited with a good work?
Are you saying that baptism isn’t a work? If it’s a work, how can a baby, with no faith, do this work in a way that’s pleasing to God?
 
2 Sam 12:23 says, "But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me. " (emphasis mine). I believe God is merciful and has a plan and purpose for everything. As I understand 2 Sam 12:23, David will join his son when he dies and goes to be with the Lord (in Heaven).
If you think babies who lack faith can be saved, why did you even bring up the issue about babies? Works are not the key to salvation, nor is faith the key. God’s grace is the key, and our response to it.
Do you think every unbaptized baby goes to hell? What hope did they have before Jesus commissioned the Apostles? What, in Scripture, makes you think unbaptized babies go to hell?
What did I write that would cause you to ask this question?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top