S
Spyridon
Guest
@ChunkMonk
Too much questioning.
A Jesuit hit squad has been activated and sent to your location.
Too much questioning.
A Jesuit hit squad has been activated and sent to your location.
Yes.Just to clarify: the invitation is not for people who have criticisms of some of the pope’s actions but rather for people who are holding them against the pope in a personal, resentful, or even vindictive way?
Are you suggesting that I am not in tune with people who hold something against him?Am I the only one who sees such an “invitation to forgive” as a bit oblivious…
That would be a projection of intent. I have no intent to condescend. All of us feel resentment towards someone else at times.…condescending…
Are you thinking that I have a different motive than encouraging forgiveness?disingenuous?
Well, I can’t do anything about your judgment of dishonesty, other than to tell you that my intent is sincere.This thread seems very dishonest and divisive. What was the real purpose in making this?
http://catholicherald.co.uk/news/20...en-a-man-and-a-woman-and-we-cannot-change-it/In terms of division, I am glad that we share a concern about divisiveness. I find the differences over Pope Francis divisive, and I am trying to do something about that here.
No.Are you thinking that I have a different motive than encouraging forgiveness?
The irony is I’m not sure you’re aware you just asked a loaded question.Are you suggesting that I am not in tune with people who hold something against him?
When you say “forgive”, does that mean a mistake or wrong has been commited? Because…That would be a projection of intent. I have no intent to condescend. All of us feel resentment towards someone else at times.
It seems the “questions” or criticisms you’ve invited others to bring have been met with saccharine counter-arguments. So, yes, I’m wondering if in your mind, any criticality must be either a misunderstanding or pent-up resentment and nothing else.Are you thinking that I have a different motive than encouraging forgiveness?
Great question! For those that actually hold something against Pope Francis, this is a place where they can voice such resentment without being judged; that is the goal. For those that are merely trying to defend Pope Francis without addressing hurt or anger people genuinely feel, I would like people to be charitable, which means listening to people. I hope you can help me with this.I’m just wondering why you feel the need for this thread. Okay, some people have issues with Pope Francis. Others think that simply repeating “He is the Pope” is a sufficient defense for him. Exactly how is making this thread going to help unify those two people?
I want this thread to be a place of forgiveness, building community. Hopefully people will check the vicious attacks and simply ask questions, as I requested in the OP.All I see is people who have issues with Pope Francis giving what they can without being banned and other group I mentioned viciously attacking them and piously declaring themselves the good children who listen. The people who would viciously attack the Pope are not allowed on CAF or they would be here too.
Hmmm. I see what you are saying. This involves some trust, and you have no reason to trust me, I understand.This near-worship of ‘dialogue’ that modern Catholics have begun to display is really stupid and self-defeating…and smacks to me of a trap.
Well, I am a fool. Hopefully I will learn something!I won’t pretend to know ypur motives in creating this, but I will question the wisdom of it.
I can think of a lot of ways to say what you think he meant, and in none of them would I say what he said without saying MORE. There wasn’t a place in what he actually said that qualified the phrase “God does not exist.”I think that he is addressing people who think of God as something “out there” and impersonal. That is why I would say it. Why would you say it, and have good intentions?
This one gives a similar explanation for how it could be misinterpreted or even be understandable as it sits because of its context.Gorgias said:I would say that it’s a translation from another language, spoken by someone in their particular linguistic idiom.
If I were speaking in English, I might say it differently. But then, if I did that, then I wouldn’t be ‘quoting’ so much as ‘re-expressing’, now would I?
This next one makes the most sense as far as looking at who the Holy Father is and using that as a lens for interpreting what he said: @ChunkMonkJoe_5859 said:but I think it’s also worth mentioning that this is from a homily Pope Francis gave at Santa Marta (i.e. where he lives). These homilies are much more informal and off the cuff. These homilies do not appear on the Vatican website under his homilies. They don’t receive the same amount of attention towards translation. There is no “official” translation. All you get are snippets of translations in news articles.
All this is to say that in these cases it is much easier for us English-speaking Americans to get confused as we are only seeing portions of an informal homily translated for a news article.
These replies could explain why he said (or didn’t really say) what it seemed he did.ChunkMonk said:In no way do I mean this as a criticism of the Holy Father, but I don’t think he is the type to be all that interested in challenging the upper-level theology of the Trinity. It seems way more likely that he is talking about an intimite relationship with God, rather than discussing theological definitions. That seems to be the type of “dry” stuff in religion that he largely ignores.
I’m just guessing here, but I think Pope Francis himself would agree with you. To just leave that statement “hanging there” is a bit counterproductive in his position!I agree with what you are saying. I can think of a lot of ways to say what you are saying, and in none of them would I say what he said without saying MORE. For instance “God does not exist! Not a vague impersonal God! No—a personal loving God—in three approachable persons!” Etc.
It isn’t the exact wording that I am getting at, but the idea that there wasn’t a place in what he actually said that qualified the phrase “God does not exist.”
That is why it is hard for me to se a different reason. If I had good intentions I don’t think I could leave it hanging out there like that.
This statement actually goes to the core of the issue. To me, understanding another person involves trying to discover why I would say or do exactly what the other said or did. If my answer is “I would do this if I was a bad person” or something like that, then the understanding hasn’t occurred, right? That would still be condemning, not understanding.That is why it is hard for me to se a different reason. If I had good intentions I don’t think I could leave it hanging out there like that.
Can we think of this?That is why it is hard for me to se a different reason. If I had good intentions I don’t think I could leave it hanging out there like that.
So you will forgive Pope Francis on condition that he does not stir confusion.When he ceases to stir confusion…when he comes to his senses…as the prodigal son passage goes in Scripture.
I have the same question, Usagi. Hopefully Luigi will explain how the stated positions are divisive.Pope Francis in that article seems entirely orthodox, undoubtedly disappointing some of his more permissive fans among the general populace.
Were you citing it as an example of him having done or said something wrong?