How to get to heaven

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcdurel
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Moondweller wrote:
[QUOTERom 11:29 “…the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.”]He’s not going to teach the opposite to the Corinthians. Nor did he. Salvation is “a GIFT of God…,” hence, irrevocable.

You are assuming Salvation means going to heaven. Salvation come from the word save, which means to be set free from evil. Jesus came to save us from our sins, which means to free us from the evil of sin. He does this by His grace which takes away our inclination to sin.

The Church teaches that Salvation is** “this great gift of God which is liberation from everything that oppresses man but which is above all liberation from sin and the Evil One, in the joy of knowing God and being known by Him, of seeing Him, and of being given over to Him.”** (Evangelization in the Modern World)

So it is true, that the gift of salvation that we receive, when we are baptized is irrevocable, that is, God will not take it back. BUT, salvation is liberation from the slavery of sin. It is not forcing us NOT to sin. After we have been freed from the compulsion, or slavery to sin, by grace, received through the sacraments and prayer, merited by Jesus, then we still have a free will to sin or not so sin. Thus, if we still choose to sin, after having been freed from the compulsion to sin, then we are worse off than before. And if we die unrepentant, then we ill end up in hell.

Protestants don’t really know the definition of salvation. They think it is going to heaven, or the assurance of going to heaven, or the right to go to heaven.
The Church defines it salvation as ** “this great gift of God which is liberation from everything that oppresses man but which is above all liberation from sin and the Evil One, in the joy of knowing God and being known by Him, of seeing Him, and of being given over to Him.”**

I have to repeat this over and over because this is the correct definition, the same definition the the apostles handed down to their successors, the Pope and the bishops of the Catholic Church. This definition fits all of St. Paul’s writings, who often referred to the Christians as having been saved, yet they could still end up in hell if they did not repent of the sins they were committing.
In other words, just because they have been set free from their compulsion to sin, does not mean they have lost their free will. Thus, all Christians who have been saved, still have a free will, and they can still choose to give into mortal sin, (such as fornication, adultery, promoting abortion, promoting sex outside of marriage, drunkeness, drug abuse, etc.) and if they die unrepentant, they are dying in rebellion against God, and thus they will reject heaven when they die, and thus will end up in hell. Even if they have received the grace of salvation at one point in their lives, then can still end up in hell. Grace is the favor of God’s life in our souls. When we give into mortal sin, we are in opposition to God and thus we reject His life in our soul. We reject His grace. He does not take it back. God will never take back His gift, but we can reject it, and thus end up in hell.

I started this thread, because I wanted to show that all that if all that is necessary to enter heaven is to repent of our mortal sins, then the primary reason Jesus founded a Church was to free us from the slavery and misery of sin, so that we can be happy here and now. In other words, before Jesus came, the Jews did not have salvation. They were not freed from their slavery to sin. That is why even the greatest and best Jews, such as Moses committed murder and David, who God called a man after my own heart, adultery and murder. Yes they repented and ended up in heaven, but their lives on earth were miserable because they were slaves to sin. They had the Law, but they didn’t have the grace to keep the Law. They could repent everytime they sinned, but they could not help sinning most of the time, so they were miserable. That is why Jesus said he came so set us free. He wanted us to be free from the slavery of sin, so that we could love Him and our neighbor the way we should, and thus have happiness on this earth.

Since all that is necessary to repent of our mortal sins, then all the rest of the Catholic faith, all the teachings and all the sacraments are not directed primarily to getting us to heaven, but they are primarily directed to our salvation, that is, directed to freeing us from the slavery of sin, so that we can start living holy and thus happy lives here and now.
Thus, Jesus became man primarily to free us from the misery and slavery of sin. So the whole Church was founded by Jesus to continue His work, of proclaiming the Gospel of salvation (liberation from the slavery of sin), and to make available the grace that saves us.
Thus while grace is a free gift that we cannot earn, we can reject this gift by mortal sin, and if die unrepentant we are dying in rebellion against God and thus we will reject heaven (where we would have to repent to enter) and choose hell.

Thus not only do some forms of Protestantism err in teaching we can die unrepentant and still end up in heaven, they almost all err in teaching that Salvation means primarily “going to heaven, or assurance of heaven or opening the gates of heaven”.
Salvation means to be freed from our concupiscence, from our inclination to sin, from our slavery to sin, from our compulsions to sin. That is the primary reason God became man.
 
Massive spiritualization? Do you believe in your own doctrine of sola scriptura or not? Why is it that you can read your bible and have it teach you one thing but then you deny others their read of scripture and think that the Holy Spirit only speaks to you and not anyone else? You can’t have it both ways. You can’t just say “that’s spiritualization” as if that is bad. What do you mean by “Spiritualization”? Are you against the Holy Spirit ?

Also, you are completely wrong in thinking that God never said anything about the Gentiles in the OT. Paul was certainly not the first to reveal this! Mary & Joseph (1st Jewish Christians) heard it fulfilled (read Simeon’s prophecy in Luke 2:29-32 . Oh quite contraire, the OT has a lot to say about the Gentiles and so do other Jewish-Christians before Paul’s time! Go back and reread . God told us explicitly that He would set up Israel for glory and blessings for the purpose of bringing notice to Himself so that other nations would come to know God too. “Have you not heard that salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22)? How can Jesus speak this to a Samaritan woman (a paganized ex-Jew) so matter of factly if it was not common knowledge that salvation was offered to all nations?

God always pre-announces His works to His holy people & servants. If what you say is true about the Christian Church just popping up out of nowhere unannounced then this would be a deviation from what we know of God’s ways. God takes delight in revealing His Plans BEFORE they happen so that men will glory in that and be awestruck so they will come to further reverence the Lord and believe more firmly that there is no other God but The Lord.

Amos 3:7 The Lord promised, “Surely the Sovereign Lord does nothing without revealing His plan to His servants the prophets.”

Deuteronomy 4:5-8 reads: “See, I have taught you decrees and laws as the LORD my God commanded me, so that you may follow them in the land you are entering to take possession of it. Observe them carefully, for this will show your wisdom and understanding to the nations, who will hear about all these decrees and say, "Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.” What other nation is so great as to have their gods near them the way the LORD our God is near us whenever we pray to him? And what other nation is so great as to have such righteous decrees and laws as this body of laws I am setting before you today?"

The Torah teaches that the paths for non-Jews to have their place in the World To Come is by following the paths of the Noahide, being a Righteous Gentile.
The Seven Noahide Laws
Belief in God
Respect God & Praise Him
Respect Human Life
Respect The Family
Respect Human Beings
Have a Judicial System
Respect all Creatures

Genesis 12:2-3
I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”

Isaiah 42:5-9
This is what God the LORD says— he who created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread out the earth and all that comes out of it, who gives breath to its people, and life to those who walk on it:

“I, the LORD, have called you in righteousness; I will take hold of your hand. I will keep you and will make you to be a covenant for the people and a light for the Gentiles, to open eyes that are blind, to free captives from prison and to release from the dungeon those who sit in darkness.

“I am the LORD; that is my name! I will not give my glory to another or my praise to idols. See, the former things have taken place, and new things I declare; before they spring into being I announce them to you.”

Isaiah 43:12-13
I have revealed and saved and proclaimed— I, and not some foreign god among you. You are my witnesses,” declares the LORD, “that I am God. Yes, and from ancient days I am he. No one can deliver out of my hand. When I act, who can reverse it?”

Isaiah 49:1-4
Listen to me, you islands;** hear this, you distant nations**: Before I was born the LORD called me; from my birth he has made mention of my name. He made my mouth like a sharpened sword, in the shadow of his hand he hid me; he made me into a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver. He said to me, “You are my servant, Israel, in whom I will display my splendor.” But I said, “I have labored to no purpose; I have spent my strength in vain and for nothing. Yet what is due me is in the LORD’s hand, and my reward is with my God.”

[continued]

BF
I NEVER said that Gentiles are not mentioned in the O.T. Gentiles will be blessed through the rise of Israel. In the coming earthly kingdom Israel will be a blessing to all the Gentile nations. This kingdom was foretold in a myriad of O.T. prophecies. As we come into the gospels our LORD comes preaching the gospel of the kingdom to the Jews - Mt 4:23; 9:35 He sent the 12 “only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” - Mt. 10:5-10. They were to preach that the “kingdom was at hand” [the gospel of the kingdom]. The 12, AT THAT TIME, did not know of the LORD’s impending death, burial and resurrection. Luke 18:31-34. So, they were not preaching His death, burial and resurrection AT THAT TIME. After His resurrection we read in John 20:9 “For as yet they KNEW NOT THE SCRIPTURE THAT HE MUST RISE AGAIN FROM THE DEAD!”
 
Massive spiritualization? Do you believe in your own doctrine of sola scriptura or not? Why is it that you can read your bible and have it teach you one thing but then you deny others their read of scripture and think that the Holy Spirit only speaks to you and not anyone else? You can’t have it both ways. You can’t just say “that’s spiritualization” as if that is bad. What do you mean by “Spiritualization”? Are you against the Holy Spirit ?

Also, you are completely wrong in thinking that God never said anything about the Gentiles in the OT. Paul was certainly not the first to reveal this! Mary & Joseph (1st Jewish Christians) heard it fulfilled (read Simeon’s prophecy in Luke 2:29-32 . Oh quite contraire, the OT has a lot to say about the Gentiles and so do other Jewish-Christians before Paul’s time! Go back and reread . God told us explicitly that He would set up Israel for glory and blessings for the purpose of bringing notice to Himself so that other nations would come to know God too. “Have you not heard that salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22)? How can Jesus speak this to a Samaritan woman (a paganized ex-Jew) so matter of factly if it was not common knowledge that salvation was offered to all nations?

God always pre-announces His works to His holy people & servants. If what you say is true about the Christian Church just popping up out of nowhere unannounced then this would be a deviation from what we know of God’s ways. God takes delight in revealing His Plans BEFORE they happen so that men will glory in that and be awestruck so they will come to further reverence the Lord and believe more firmly that there is no other God but The Lord.

Amos 3:7 The Lord promised, “Surely the Sovereign Lord does nothing without revealing His plan to His servants the prophets.”

Deuteronomy 4:5-8 reads: “See, I have taught you decrees and laws as the LORD my God commanded me, so that you may follow them in the land you are entering to take possession of it. Observe them carefully, for this will show your wisdom and understanding to the nations, who will hear about all these decrees and say, "Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.” What other nation is so great as to have their gods near them the way the LORD our God is near us whenever we pray to him? And what other nation is so great as to have such righteous decrees and laws as this body of laws I am setting before you today?"

The Torah teaches that the paths for non-Jews to have their place in the World To Come is by following the paths of the Noahide, being a Righteous Gentile.
The Seven Noahide Laws
Belief in God
Respect God & Praise Him
Respect Human Life
Respect The Family
Respect Human Beings
Have a Judicial System
Respect all Creatures

Genesis 12:2-3
I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”

Isaiah 42:5-9
This is what God the LORD says— he who created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread out the earth and all that comes out of it, who gives breath to its people, and life to those who walk on it:

“I, the LORD, have called you in righteousness; I will take hold of your hand. I will keep you and will make you to be a covenant for the people and a light for the Gentiles, to open eyes that are blind, to free captives from prison and to release from the dungeon those who sit in darkness.

“I am the LORD; that is my name! I will not give my glory to another or my praise to idols. See, the former things have taken place, and new things I declare; before they spring into being I announce them to you.”

Isaiah 43:12-13
I have revealed and saved and proclaimed— I, and not some foreign god among you. You are my witnesses,” declares the LORD, “that I am God. Yes, and from ancient days I am he. No one can deliver out of my hand. When I act, who can reverse it?”

Isaiah 49:1-4
Listen to me, you islands;** hear this, you distant nations**: Before I was born the LORD called me; from my birth he has made mention of my name. He made my mouth like a sharpened sword, in the shadow of his hand he hid me; he made me into a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver. He said to me, “You are my servant, Israel, in whom I will display my splendor.” But I said, “I have labored to no purpose; I have spent my strength in vain and for nothing. Yet what is due me is in the LORD’s hand, and my reward is with my God.”

[continued]

BF
“Spiritualization” is when you change clear Scripture to fit your denominational scheme. When our LORD Jesus Christ said, “I am not sent but unto the lost house of Israel…” He meant just that. When the O.T. prophets foretold that Israel would have a kingdom on earth when Messiah comes [in His 2nd advent, we know now]. When our LORD told the 12 that they would “…sit on 12 thrones judging the 12 tribes of Israel.” He meant just that. When the 11 asked our LORD, “Will you AT THIS TIME restore AGAIN the kingdom to Israel?” They knew what they were asking after having the O.T. Scriptures “opened” unto them by our wonderful LORD. When our LORD sent the 12 “only to the lost sheep of Israel.” That’s who they ministered to. When James, Peter and John agreed to confine their ministry to Israel in Gal. 2, they meant just that.
When Paul said that the Jews and Gentiles would become joint heirs in a joint Body and that this was not revealed in past ages, he meant just that.
 
You need to RE-READ my post, Ryan. I pointed out that in the Greek Paul most often uses “law” without the definite article, meaning “the principle of law” (works/merit), not the Law of Moses. Only when he uses the definite article is he referring to the Law of Moses, which INCLUDES the Decalogue, which he calls a ministry of death and condemnation in 1 Cor. 3.

No law, whether the Law of Moses (with its condemning Decalogue), or the law of Christ, or the law of liberty, or the law of faith has the power to save anyone. Men are not saved by the principle of law, PERIOD.Gal 3:18 "For if the inheritance is based on law (the principle of law), it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise."

Gal 3:21…For if a law (not THE Law) had been given which was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law” (the principle of law).The Law of Moses (with its 10 Commandments) was to lead men to Christ that they might be "justified by faith:"Gal 3:24 "Therefore the Law has become our tutor {to lead us} to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor."The SAVED are under the law of Christ (His commandment for the brethren to love one another), and they (the saved) operate under the law of liberty. But neither of these “laws” SAVED them. The SAVED operate here on earth under them. Men are saved by grace (God’s) through faith. And the saved walk/live by faith.Rom 3:27-28Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law” (no definite article, meaning a man is justified apart from the principle of law).
Romans 3:28 specifically says “works of the law” (Greek “ergon nomou”) and so does Gal. 2:16 and Gal 3:2,5,10. They are not done in a system of grace or faith. They are done in a system of debt. None of what you cite is refering to good works done in faith and God’s grace. Paul does not exclude them. You chose to ignore these verses I quoted earlier.

eternal life to those who seek glory, honor, and immortality through perseverance in good works, but wrath and fury to those who selfishly disobey the truth and obey wickedness. (Rom 2:7-8)

**For it is not those who hear the law who are just in the sight of God; rather, those who observe the law will be justified. (Rom 2:3) **

When Paul says the doers of the law will be justified he is referring to the “law of Christ” in Gal.6:2, not “works of the law” in Rom. 3:20,28; Gal. 2:16; 3:2,5,10; and Eph. 2:8-9. Paul does not exclude good works done in grace with faith in Christ. James does not exclude good works either. (He does not use “ergon nomou.” He uses “ergois agathois.”)

See how a person is justified by works and not by faith alone. (James 2:24)

I’m not arguing against faith or grace. There is just more to faith and grace than you realize. You are only seeing half of the truth.
 
Well I have tried to understand your “simple” point several times. The problem with your point is that it makes no sense of the Scripture that we have before us. The simple fact of the matter is that Paul is writing a letter to believers who were engaged in cheating and defrauding other brothers. He specifically points this out. He then asks point blank, “Do you not realize the unrighteous will not enter the kingdom of Heaven?” He asks them that question because they were engaging in the sins of “greed, thievery, and swindling” which he specifically mentions as behaviors identified with those “who will not inherit the kingdom of God”.
Correct. They were washed, sanctified, and justified, yet Paul still warns them that they can be deceived and become unrighteous. And later Paul says the same thing that happened to the Israelites (who were justified before God) could happen to them (1 Cor 10:6-12)
 
Correct. They were washed, sanctified, and justified, yet Paul still warns them that they can be deceived and become unrighteous. And later Paul says the same thing that happened to the Israelites (who were justified before God) could happen to them (1 Cor 10:6-12)
Amen Ryan! 👍 I have been enjoyed your posts - especially the sections from the book of Romans. It adds further validity, continuity and confirmation to the understanding that Pauls warnings in 1Cor 6, Gal 5 and Eph 5 were directed to “saved believers” regarding loss of inheriting the kingdom of God.
 
"Moondweller:
Rom 11:29 “…the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.”]He’s not going to teach the opposite to the Corinthians. Nor did he. Salvation is “a GIFT of God…,” hence, irrevocable.
You are assuming Salvation means going to heaven…
That is the assumption that MD remains adamantly attached to. In fact, he uses the assumption as the lens through which to interpret several of the verses that I feel clearly contradict such an assumption. 1Cor 6:1-9 is probably the clearest example. Paul addresses the saved believers of the Church throughout each verse, yet when he says, “Do you not realize the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God?” it is - through that lens - interpreted as no longer applying to the same audience because they are all, by definition, saved and going to Heaven and only the righteous go to Heaven. Therefore, it is reasoned, the verse cannot apply to them. I will say, however that he has some excellent commentary on a variety of points that I have learned from.
 
Amen Ryan! 👍 I have been enjoyed your posts - especially the sections from the book of Romans. It adds further validity, continuity and confirmation to the understanding that Pauls warnings in 1Cor 6, Gal 5 and Eph 5 were directed to “saved believers” regarding loss of inheriting the kingdom of God.
I enjoy your posts as well Philthy. Peter says something similair about falling from grace.

For, talking empty bombast, they seduce with licentious desires of the flesh those who have barely escaped from people who live in error. They promise them freedom, though they themselves are slaves of corruption, for a person is a slave of whatever overcomes him. For if they, having escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of (our) Lord and savior Jesus Christ, again become entangled and overcome by them, their last condition is worse than their first. For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment handed down to them. What is expressed in the true proverb has happened to them, “The dog returns to its own vomit,” and “A bathed sow returns to wallowing in the mire.” (2 Pet 2:18-22)
 
I NEVER said that Gentiles are not mentioned in the O.T. Gentiles will be blessed through the rise of Israel. In the coming earthly kingdom Israel will be a blessing to all the Gentile nations. This kingdom was foretold in a myriad of O.T. prophecies. As we come into the gospels our LORD comes preaching the gospel of the kingdom to the Jews - Mt 4:23; 9:35 He sent the 12 “only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” - Mt. 10:5-10. They were to preach that the “kingdom was at hand” [the gospel of the kingdom]. The 12, AT THAT TIME, did not know of the LORD’s impending death, burial and resurrection. Luke 18:31-34. So, they were not preaching His death, burial and resurrection AT THAT TIME. After His resurrection we read in John 20:9 “For as yet they KNEW NOT THE SCRIPTURE THAT HE MUST RISE AGAIN FROM THE DEAD!”
The Gentiles were blessed through the (Jewish) apostles as ambassadors of Christ bringing the good news to the Gentiles. The gentiles are now grafted in and God continues to bless His people through the Catholic Church. A remnant of the Jews will one day still come back into the Church. But this will be at a later date as right now God has hardened their hearts and left their house desolate. Until till such time as the Jews “look upon He who they have pierced” (John 19:37) and weep for Jesus as people grieves for a lost son He will not let them see his face again. Only when they say ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.” (Matthew 23:39) and will they be reunited with Him to the New Covenant and be joined to the saved Gentiles through the Catholic Church.

You seem to think that Jesus did not come for the Gentiles?

BF
 
“Spiritualization” is when you change clear Scripture to fit your denominational scheme. When our LORD Jesus Christ said, “I am not sent but unto the lost house of Israel…” He meant just that. When the O.T. prophets foretold that Israel would have a kingdom on earth when Messiah comes [in His 2nd advent, we know now]. When our LORD told the 12 that they would “…sit on 12 thrones judging the 12 tribes of Israel.” He meant just that. When the 11 asked our LORD, “Will you AT THIS TIME restore AGAIN the kingdom to Israel?” They knew what they were asking after having the O.T. Scriptures “opened” unto them by our wonderful LORD. When our LORD sent the 12 “only to the lost sheep of Israel.” That’s who they ministered to. When James, Peter and John agreed to confine their ministry to Israel in Gal. 2, they meant just that.
When Paul said that the Jews and Gentiles would become joint heirs in a joint Body and that this was not revealed in past ages, he meant just that.
Catholics are not a denomination - that is a “Protestant thing”. We are the only true and original Christian Church. There is no concept literally called “spiritualization” in the bible, This is your own idea. But there is the deeper revelation of the scriptures that Jesus promised His Church would be taught by the Holy Spirit after He was gone. Your problem is that your theology is very “thin” and very superficial compared to the depth and breath of true apostolic teaching of the Catholic Church. Protestants are still so busy being fundamentalist that they are yet to discern the 4 senses of scripture that St. Thomas Aquinas spells out in his summa theologica. We know that there is the Literal and the Spiritual; with the spiritual having the sub-categories of allegorical, moral, and anagogical.

You can’t think about teaching scripture to Catholics until you can acknowledge and understand the other 75% of what is present that you as of yet don’t even seem able to comprehend is present in scripture.

*1 Cor 3:2 I gave you milk, not solid food, for you were not yet ready for it. Indeed, you are still not ready.

Romans 11:8 as it is written:“God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes so that they could not see and ears so that they could not hear, to this very day.”*

BF
 
He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father, and he will rule over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end." (Lk 1:32-33)

This was fulfilled.

**God raised this Jesus; of this we are all witnesses. Exalted at the right hand of God, he received the promise of the holy Spirit from the Father and poured it forth, as you (both) see and hear. For David did not go up into heaven, but he himself said: ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool.”’ Therefore let the whole house of Israel know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Messiah, this Jesus whom you crucified." (Acts 2:32-36)

God exalted him at his right hand as leader and savior to grant Israel repentance and forgiveness of sins. (Acts 5:31)

We ourselves are proclaiming this good news to you that what God promised our ancestors he has brought to fulfillment for us, (their) children, by raising up Jesus, as it is written in the second psalm, ‘You are my son; this day I have begotten you.’ And that he raised him from the dead never to return to corruption he declared in this way, ‘I shall give you the benefits assured to David.’ That is why he also says in another psalm, ‘You will not suffer your holy one to see corruption.’ (Acts 13:32-35)**
 
Romans 3:28 specifically says “works of the law” (Greek “ergon nomou”) and so does Gal. 2:16 and Gal 3:2,5,10.
Gal 3:24 ôste o nomos paidagôgos êmôn gegonen eis christon ina ek pisteôs dikaiôthômen
Gal 3:24Therefore the Law has become our tutor {to lead us} to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.”“O nomos” is “the Law” (referring directly to the Mosaic Law, including the 10 Commandments). The “o” is the definite article.

Now compare this to the following verse:Rom 3:28 logizometha a=gar tsb=oun tsb=pistei dikaiousthai a=pistei anthrôpon chôris ergôn nomou
Rom 3:28
"For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law"“Ergon” is the Greek word for “works,” “labor” (it’s not a definite article). “Nomou” is the Greek word for “of law.” Translated “works of law.” NO DEFINITE ARTICLE. And with no definite article it means the principle of law. It’s not restricted to the Mosaic Law, but means ANY law principle. IOW, “apart from works” - period. It’s what Biblical soteriology is all about. It’s all about the exercise of DIVINE GRACE through faith in Christ.

The verse you cite, Rom. 3:28, the Greek, “ergon nomou” does not have the definite article.Rom 3:28 “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law” (ergon nomou).Same for all the other verses you cite. Sadly, most of the English translations get it wrong by inserting “the” where there’s no definite article and translate it theologically, not literally.

The Apostolic teaching maintains that a man is justified BY FAITH “apart from works of law,” i.e., any law principle, which means WORKS, any works. Strictly “by grace.” But this is repulsive to you, isn’t it?
When Paul says the doers of the law will be justified he is referring to the “law of Christ” in Gal.6:2, not “works of the law” in Rom. 3:20,28; Gal. 2:16; 3:2,5,10; and Eph. 2:8-9. Paul does not exclude good works done in grace with faith in Christ.
Nowhere does Paul teach that men are justified by “the law of Christ.” The justified by faith are “under” the law of Christ, which calls for the brethren to love one another. But they’re not saved nor justified by it.
James does not exclude good works either. (He does not use “ergon nomou.” He uses “ergois agathois.”)
You Catholics always take James completely out of context. We’ve been through this too many times before to go all over it again.
I’m not arguing against faith or grace.
For justification/salvation you are.
There is just more to faith and grace than you realize. You are only seeing half of the truth.
That’s like saying “There’s more to a gift than you realize, you have to work for it too.” Here’s the Pauline principle found throughout his Epistles:Rom 11:6 “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace.”
Correct. They were washed, sanctified, and justified, yet Paul still warns them that they can be deceived and become unrighteous.
Where does Paul say to the believer who has been washed, sanctified and justified (reckoned righteous) in the name of Christ, that he can be made unrighteous. Be specific, please.
He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father, and he will rule over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end." (Lk 1:32-33)
This was fulfilled.
Not at all. Christ is sharing His heavenly Father’s throne in heaven, functioning there as the believer’s High Priest. He is not on His father David’s throne which is in Jerusalem; nor is He presently reigning as King over His earthly Kingdom. He is instead building His church for which He lives to intercede (Heb. 7:25).
(Acts 2:32-36) (Acts 5:31) (Acts 13:32-35)
Contextually these verses have to do with testifying of His being raised, bodily, from the dead, not reigning over His promised, earthly Kingdom - which is yet future and will not begin until His second advent to this earth. It’s why He’s coming back (and His glorified church/bride with Him).
 
I enjoy your posts as well Philthy. Peter says something similair about falling from grace.

For, talking empty bombast, they seduce with licentious desires of the flesh those who have barely escaped from people who live in error. They promise them freedom, though they themselves are slaves of corruption, for a person is a slave of whatever overcomes him. For if they, having escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of (our) Lord and savior Jesus Christ, again become entangled and overcome by them, their last condition is worse than their first. For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment handed down to them. What is expressed in the true proverb has happened to them, “The dog returns to its own vomit,” and “A bathed sow returns to wallowing in the mire.” (2 Pet 2:18-22)
As the prodigal son longed to be back in his father’s house (if he had died in the pig pen he would have died as a son, not a pig), so the pig, having been cleaned up on the outside (religious), still longs to wallow in the mire in the inside and returns to it - according to its true nature. The pig was never a son and the son was never a pig. Just as a dog returns to its own vomit - according to its true nature.
 
As the prodigal son longed to be back in his father’s house (if he had died in the pig pen he would have died as a son, not a pig),
Yes, and no. Biologically he remained a son. With respect to any inheritance, he was dead. In the same way we can become sons by adoption and squander our inheritance (the kingdom of God) through sin. It’s useless to die as a “son” if all the benefits of that sonship have been squandered, and that is exactly what would have happened had the son not repented and returned to the Father.
 
Yes, and no. Biologically he remained a son. With respect to any inheritance, he was dead. In the same way we can become sons by adoption and squander our inheritance (the kingdom of God) through sin. It’s useless to die as a “son” if all the benefits of that sonship have been squandered, and that is exactly what would have happened had the son not repented and returned to the Father.
The story isn’t about the son’s inheritance, it’s about the son himself. But even more so about the incredible depth of the grace of his loving father.

The prodigal son only parallels the believer, saved by grace through faith…a gift of God, not as a result of works, in that he’s been made a son of God (adopted) through faith in Christ Jesus. To a father a son is always a son. The status being based on birth, not behavior (do you have children, Phil?).

But the inheritance of the prodigal son does not parallel that of the believer now, "born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead:"1 Pet 1:3-5 "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance {which is} imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."You must rightly divide the Word of truth. Not everything in the Bible applies directly to the saved by grace through faith…not as a result of works. Else Christ died needlessly and His bodily resurrection is completely meaningless (cf. Rom. 4:25 - 5:2).
 
As the prodigal son longed to be back in his father’s house (if he had died in the pig pen he would have died as a son, not a pig), so the pig, having been cleaned up on the outside (religious), still longs to wallow in the mire in the inside and returns to it - according to its true nature. The pig was never a son and the son was never a pig. Just as a dog returns to its own vomit - according to its true nature.
For, talking empty bombast, they seduce with licentious desires of the flesh those who have barely escaped from people who live in error. They promise them freedom, though they themselves are slaves of corruption, for a person is a slave of whatever overcomes him. For if they, having escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of (our) Lord and savior Jesus Christ, again become entangled and overcome by them, their last condition is worse than their first. For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment handed down to them. What is expressed in the true proverb has happened to them, “The dog returns to its own vomit,” and “A bathed sow returns to wallowing in the mire.” (2 Pet 2:18-22)

It says they actually escaped the defilements of the world through Jesus. It does not say they were clean on the outside and defiled on the inside. They were slaves of corruption who barely escaped that condition, which means they were overcome by Christ. Someone does not become entangled and overcome again by something they didn’t escape from in the first place.
 
Hi

Ok basically what happens is God loves us all more than you can ever imagine and because of this, does not want us to go to hell. Also he is very forgiving, so forgiving that he sent his son down from heaven in the form of a human to die for our salvation. So that means that he will forgive you if you want forgiveness. To go to hell someone would have to knowingly reject god and not turn back and son all the time on purpose and knowingly. That’s how bad you have to be.
Agreed…or at least that’s how I was taught by priests and nuns through 12 years of Catholic school. Period, end of story. If some of these other guys were correct, Heaven would be almost completely empty.
 
The story isn’t about the son’s inheritance
His inheritance is part of the story.
it’s about the son himself.
The son’s inheritance is “about the son himself”
But even more so about the incredible depth of the grace of his loving father.
The prodigal son only parallels the believer, saved by grace through faith…a gift of God, not as a result of works, in that he’s been made a son of God (adopted) through faith in Christ Jesus. To a father a son is always a son. The status being based on birth, not behavior (do you have children, Phil?).
Uhh, you’re repeating yourself. I already agreed that biologically he would remain a son no matter what. Remaining a son does not guarantee that he doesnt forfeit his inheritance.
But the inheritance of the prodigal son does not parallel that of the believer now,
I disagree.
You must rightly divide the Word of truth.
So must you!
Not everything in the Bible applies directly to the saved by grace through faith…not as a result of works. Else Christ died needlessly and His bodily resurrection is completely meaningless (cf. Rom. 4:25 - 5:2).
I dont find anything in Scripture that renders His bodily resurrection completely meaningless.
The son, if he had not repented would have died a son of his father in no meaningful sense other than their biological relationship. Had he not repented, he would have cut himself off from his fathers love and his inheritance. Its really very simple. You are making it more complicated than it needs to be. “And I know why”.
 
The son, if he had not repented would have died a son of his father in no meaningful sense other than their biological relationship. Had he not repented, he would have cut himself off from his fathers love and his inheritance. Its really very simple. You are making it more complicated than it needs to be. “And I know why”.
Based on the character of the father there is no way the son would have ever been cut off from his father’s love. At his lowest point the son knew he could go back to his father and be received. And when he did go back he was received with infinite grace, far beyond his expectation. The father/son relationship never changed, never diminished, was never in jeopardy.

The son had only an earthly inheritance which he squandered, but the true, born again, believer (adopted by the Father) has a heavenly inheritance which is “reserved” there for him, and “will not fade away” (1 Pet. 1:3-5).

Does such grace (unmerited favor), demonstrated by the father toward his son, feel repulsive to you, Phil? Keep in mind the reaction of the other son.
 
For, talking empty bombast, they seduce with licentious desires of the flesh those who have barely escaped from people who live in error. They promise them freedom, though they themselves are slaves of corruption, for a person is a slave of whatever overcomes him. For if they, having escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of (our) Lord and savior Jesus Christ, again become entangled and overcome by them, their last condition is worse than their first. For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment handed down to them. What is expressed in the true proverb has happened to them, “The dog returns to its own vomit,” and “A bathed sow returns to wallowing in the mire.” (2 Pet 2:18-22)

It says they actually escaped the defilements of the world through Jesus.
No it doesn’t Ryan. It says they escaped the defilement (pollution) of the world (that’s external) "by the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ." That describes the mere religious man to a tee.

But these particular men are described as “false teachers” that rise up from among the saints who even deny the doctrine of redemption through the shed blood of Christ handed down by the Apostles (1 Pet. 2:1). They’re “springs without water, and mists driven by a storm, for whom the black darkness has been reserved” (vs. 17). And Peter describes their true nature vividly in vs. 22: Dogs that return to their own vomit, and pigs after washing that return to wallowing in the mire. Their true nature eventually comes through. Yet, sadly, many still follow them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top