F
foolintherain
Guest
A friend of mine posted this article on facebook asking the question:
“How can anyone come to the conclusion that what government needs anywhere on earth is MORE religious influence?”
Now on the face of it I can see the fallacy in the article. The blatant appeal to emotion. The illogical conclusion that there is a causal relationship between the faith of a people the poverty they suffer.
His comments are specifically directed at the Catholic church and not the government of the Philippines.
How do I respond to this drivel?
“How can anyone come to the conclusion that what government needs anywhere on earth is MORE religious influence?”
Now on the face of it I can see the fallacy in the article. The blatant appeal to emotion. The illogical conclusion that there is a causal relationship between the faith of a people the poverty they suffer.
His comments are specifically directed at the Catholic church and not the government of the Philippines.
How do I respond to this drivel?