How Women Blow Their Marriages (an article)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Almost everything in that article applies to men too and how men blow their marriages.
 
I think this article and the one it responds to are both good reads for men and women. It takes two to save or squander a marriage.
 
Touché. It does have a number of valid points. It is a good guide to be aware of. I’ll admit.

I have heard it said that typically women go into marriage thinking he will change, that men going into marriage thinking she’ll always stay the same!
 
Why get advice from someone who has failed marriages look to those who have stayed married. I wonder if their advice would be similar?
 
As long as the advice is sound, why care who it came from?

If your house is on fire, does it matter who provides the water?
 
Touché. It does have a number of valid points. It is a good guide to be aware of. I’ll admit.

I have heard it said that typically women go into marriage thinking he will change, that men going into marriage thinking she’ll always stay the same!
👍

With regard to women’s expectations, I’ve heard it explained like this: Women are very concerned about the marriage itself, and their concerns boil down to three things – the “aisle” (Will all the flowers be right? Will I look all right when everyone turns around to look at me? Will I stumble and fall or do something else to embarrass myself?), the “altar” (Will he actually be there? Will we get all our lines right? Can I avoid breaking into tears, or starting to giggle? Can he and the other guys avoid fainting?), and the “hymn” (Can we get through all the music without any embarrassing sour notes?)

Then comes the day, and she turns the corner into the center aisle back of the church and sees that guy standing in his tux at the front, and all of a sudden the spellings change: “I’ll . . . ALTER . . . him!”

😃
 
Why get advice from someone who has failed marriages look to those who have stayed married. I wonder if their advice would be similar?
A nurse once told me a story of how a mother of one of her patients (who was a child) verbally attacked her one time saying “what qualifies you to work with children when you don’t have any of your own?” She replied “well I never had a stroke either but I helped your father recover from his.”

In other words, just because someone hasn’t been in a successful marriage doesn’t mean they can’t offer sound advice so that others can learn from their experience.

For people who have had successful marriages, they should thank God every day. For people who are divorced, it is not always because of something “they did”.
 
Why get advice from someone who has failed marriages look to those who have stayed married. I wonder if their advice would be similar?
In a way, I thought that too. The advice seems detached and most of it generic to all relationships between people.

Marriages have that added element that you aren’t free to just walk away from it without it having been deemed intrinsically invalid, so at the end of the day, the most important things in keeping marriage going concern identifying as ‘married’ rather than the generic aspects of two individuals making a relationship work. (Which are still important).

That aspect may be more difficult to truly convey when someone is experiencing detachment from marriage because of divorce.
 
Why get advice from someone who has failed marriages look to those who have stayed married. I wonder if their advice would be similar?
Wife married happily for 34 years.

Yes, I think this advice is good and I would probably give a lot of the same advice, although I would probably have more “do’s” rather than “don’ts” on my list.
 
I think this article and the one it responds to are both good reads for men and women. It takes two to save or squander a marriage.
I disagree. It takes two to make a good marriage, but only one to destroy it. I saw it over and over and over on the infidelity forum: one partner doing everything in their power to forgive, heal, move on, start fresh, be a better spouse, while the other just continued with hurtful, hateful, destructive behaviors to the point it was simply impossible to have anything like a real marriage with that person.
 
Almost everything in that article applies to men too and how men blow their marriages.
It is not an exhaustive list of mistakes, and it does concentrate on the mistakes women tend to make. It is a bit more a list of symptoms, though, rather than a list of fundamental problems. The “how we did it” lists tend to be a bit better at describing the foundations of a good marriage and important “maintenance routines.”
 
He cannot possibly be expected to know the motive or reason behind your latest silent treatment or emotional outburst. You can’t lie to him and say nothing is bothering you then get angry three days later because he didn’t read your mind and change the offending behavior. Mature and respectful communication doesn’t work that way.
On the other hand, one shouldn’t assume a man won’t know when a woman lies. The stereotype according to which men lack the requisite ‘emotional intelligence’ here and women have the advantage is a myth.
When you belittle your spouse, criticize his efforts, and mock him you are being emotionally and verbally abusive. I know it’s all the rage to paint the patriarch of the house as a blithering fool but if it’s behavior you wouldn’t want done to you then tell me why exactly you think it’s OK for you to do to him? Do you think your feelings are more important than his?
There’s a widespread belief or attitude according to which courtesy only works one way, i.e. man to woman. I see a lot of rude behaviour and bad manners from women these days, perhaps more than from men.
 
OH MY, THIS HIT HOME FOR ME! Seeing as an adult the way my mom treats my dad as there to serve her emotional whims just makes me cringe b/c I know that’s how I’m treating my DH. The last time I visited my folks, we were all in the car waiting on mom as usual and she got upset w/ my dad for forgetting HER gloves on the table. I know I’m commanded to respect my parents, but I asked my mom why it’s HIS responsibility to get HER gloves!

Thankfully, though at times I hate it, DH is like his dad. His dad is like my mom, there to be served. Of course, both of us are the babies of our families, so we both expect to be served, which really doesn’t work for either of us:P The reason it’s good that he’s this way as that he doesn’t give into my every whim, I’m forced to grow up (a little). Not saying my dad doesn’t have a backbone, but he can’t say no to mom w/out her pulling the emotional manipulation. At this point, I pray for him to be blessed for serving my mom for 48 years and for having to live in an unequally yoked marriage. Sometimes I’m jealous of my mom for having someone to serve her and give her everything she wants; then I realize what a monster she is and how can she ever feel love for someone she doesn’t show love to and who despises her?

Sometimes I see my MIL’s service to her DH as a weakness b/c she’s a people pleaser and needs to make up for her insecurities and b/c her DH isn’t very affectionate, even neglectful (DH and his brothers would agree w/ me here). But then I compare her to my mom and how much MIL has gone without and that she’s still joyful and considerate and I realize I have a lot of growing to do.

Thanks for posting this!
 
OH MY, THIS HIT HOME FOR ME! Seeing as an adult the way my mom treats my dad as there to serve her emotional whims just makes me cringe b/c I know that’s how I’m treating my DH. The last time I visited my folks, we were all in the car waiting on mom as usual and she got upset w/ my dad for forgetting HER gloves on the table. I know I’m commanded to respect my parents, but I asked my mom why it’s HIS responsibility to get HER gloves!
It may be the expectation of squiring that arises when the post-mediaeval tales of chivalric romance (which originally came from a heresy within Islam in Andalusia in about 10th century and from there to Provence, and then the troubadours would spread it around) go to people’s heads.

If you look at Friedrich v. Schiller’s The Glove, you may recognise a couple of things. Similar themes in legends go back to the middle ages because even then, I guess, sober-minded people recognised the excesses of lady worship. I’m one of the last hand-kissers myself, but I always stress that the whole chivalry thing works both ways. Gentility applies to men and women equally, and being a lady involves a ton of obligations, not only entitlement.

In the middle ages, I guess, people would have had vices and virtues and redeeming qualities for their faults, such as perhaps the males could be rather feisty, quarrelsome and inclined to conflict and land grabs, making up for it with valour and sacrifice, while on the other hand, I guess the noblewomen may’ve been rather fickle and spoiled but making up for it when the time came to nurse the wounded or perform works of charity, manage the land in the husband’s absence on a war etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top