How would explain this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pio_s
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

pio_s

Guest
Say a charity like the Susan G Komen foundation which conducts research and searches for a cure for cancer gives money to planned parenthood (which is obviously immoral), can you say it would be wrong to support it?

I believe so, but tell me your ideas, and how you would justify your position to another.
 
This is the classic problem of cooperation in evil.

There are many distinctions to be made. First among these is the distinction between formal and material cooperation.

I formally cooperate in evil if I help to make the evil act of another possible because I also intend that evil act. This is always immoral. An example would be giving money to the foundation because I support abortion.

I materially cooperate in evil if I help to make the evil act of another possible but do not intend that evil act.

There is a further distinction between proximate and remote material cooperation. This has to do with my degree of involvement in the evil act itself. Handing an instrument to a doctor performing an abortion if I’m pro-life is proximate material cooperation. Proximate material cooperation is immoral.

Remote material cooperation is the type of cooperation in evil that sending money to this foundation would be as long as I am not intending to support abortion. This type of cooperation could be moral.

However, there is a further distinction between active and passive cooperation. The distinction has to do with whether one is actively doing something or merely not speaking up against something.

Essentially, if there are other foundations that do the same good work without supporting abortion, then I should support those foundations instead. If there aren’t, then I should avoid passively cooperating in evil. This might mean writing a letter and asking that the foundation not support abortion. All this is presuming that there is a proportionate reason for me to support the good work of the foundation.
 
thanks, this sounds reasonable to me. Are the distinctions and interpretations of those distinctions (morality of them) held by the church?
 
thanks, this sounds reasonable to me. Are the distinctions and interpretations of those distinctions (morality of them) held by the church?
No problem! It’s tough to figure out these issues.

The terminology is used in classic Catholic moral theology, Church documents frequently employ it when they’re more technical.

There’s a presentation of this on NewAdvent: newadvent.org/cathen/01100a.htm

An example of a document using this terminology is the response from the CDF about using vaccines derived from aborted fetuses (Starting on page 4): ncbcenter.org/vaticanresponse.pdf
 
My wife ran into this issue when being, uh, “asked” to contribute to the Komen foundation at the school where she works. It was one of those contribution drives, where they want “100% participation,” and some teachers told her they’d help her out if she didn’t have the money now. You get the picture.

She contributed a minimal amount (a few dollars). I told her that it was not her fault that the Komen foundation chose to support Planned Parenthood. It was their decision to lump the two causes together, and it should therefore be her decision whether or not to support both causes by her donation. Of course, I was talking to her as an outsider – I wasn’t the one being pressured daily by her superiors and peers like she was.
 
My wife ran into this issue when being, uh, “asked” to contribute to the Komen foundation at the school where she works. It was one of those contribution drives, where they want “100% participation,” and some teachers told her they’d help her out if she didn’t have the money now. You get the picture.

She contributed a minimal amount (a few dollars). I told her that it was not her fault that the Komen foundation chose to support Planned Parenthood. It was their decision to lump the two causes together, and it should therefore be her decision whether or not to support both causes by her donation. Of course, I was talking to her as an outsider – I wasn’t the one being pressured daily by her superiors and peers like she was.
My husband faces the same thing at Ford with its United Way drives. I told him that this year, blackballed or no, I didn’t think it was prudent or moral to give money to them anymore (they give to Planned Parenthood). I figure we’ll send that money to Catholic Charities instead.

Of course, it’ll be him, not me, who has to deal with the pressure from work. But everyone there knows him well enough to leave it at, “Do you REALLY want to talk about this?”
 
interesting…i just emailed Komen to get a clear answer of whether or not the Michigan chapter donates to PP. here is the response:

"Thank you for contacting Susan G. Komen for the Cure regarding your concerns about grants made to Planned Parenthood for breast health services. I am writing on behalf of Dr. Cheryl Perkins, our Senior Clinical Advisor. I hope the following information will be helpful in understanding this issue.

Our mission is to eradicate breast cancer as a life-threatening disease by advancing research, education, screening and treatment. We appreciate your interest in this important mission.

The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) review of recent scientific literature reveals that no conclusive evidence exists to suggest that abortion increases a woman’s risk for developing breast cancer. For highlights and links to the findings associated with this topic, please visit the Komen for the Cure’s website, www.komen.org.

The common thread to the individuals we serve is that they are at risk for breast cancer. Komen and its Affiliates do not provide any funding for abortions or for any activities outside the scope of our mission to eradicate breast cancer. And we do not discriminate on age, gender, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability or decisions people have made in their lives.

Seventy-five percent of the money raised by Komen Affiliates stays in their communities to provide grants to local organizations or groups who can best address the gaps identified through the needs assessment. A minimum of 25 percent of the net proceeds from any Komen Affiliate event directly supports Komen and Research Grant Program, which is the nation’s largest private funding source for breast cancer research.

The grants funded by Komen and its Affiliates are specific to Komen’s mission to eradicate breast cancer as a life-threatening disease. Komen Affiliates are responsible for conducting community needs assessments to identify gaps in breast health and breast cancer services within their respective communities. All Komen Affiliate grant applications are solicited through an open request for proposals and are reviewed by a Grants Committee comprised of local physicians, community health professionals, and breast health advocates. Any not-for-profit organization may apply for a grant from Komen to provide services specific to our mission to eradicate breast cancer. The Grants Committee recommends to the Affiliate’s board of directors those grant applications that should be approved for funding, and grant recipients are required to provide detailed reports to the funding Affiliate at least bi-annually.

All community grants are restricted to provide vital breast health education, screening and treatment services for underserved women. The services funded by Komen Affiliates include breast health education programs, screening mammograms, clinical breast examinations, diagnostic mammograms and ultrasounds, program promotion, and salary support for outreach workers and registered nurses that provide breast health education and clinical breast examinations.

In many urban and rural areas, Planned Parenthood may be the only source of free or low-cost women’s health screening services (e.g., pap smears, mammograms, clinical breast exams, etc.). Unfortunately, many underserved women find breast cancer at a later and more aggressive stage and have a higher mortality rate from this disease. Some Komen Affiliates provide restricted grants to local Planned Parenthood clinics that offer vital breast health services for underserved women in their communities. These services often help to provide otherwise unavailable breast screening for women ages 40 to 50, which may not be covered by the Centers for Disease Control’s Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Thank you for your support and your commitment to our mission to eradicate breast cancer as a life-threatening disease."

first of all “no conclusive evidence” doesn’t convince me that there’s not a link b/wn breast cancer and abortion. secondly, there’s no mention of a link b/wn breast cancer and birth control. how could an organization trying to eliminate breast cancer give in any way to an organization that might be causing it?

also, i don’t see why a woman that is “underserved” would not qualify for the CDC’s breast cancer and cervical cancer program. according to the guidelines, i’m in the “underserved” population financially, and i’m not poor.

lastly, my mom recently died from breast cancer-inflammatory breast cancer, a rare and severe type. (and only 25% of their money is going towards research?) however, i still would never give to komen or any other organization affiliated with planned parenthood in any way.
 
I understand that it is true that the Nat’l Cancer Institute says there is no link between abortion and breast cancer, acording to their study. But there are studies that say there IS a link. Too much is unknown about any of these studies, e.g. population studied, number studied, what the hypothesis was, etc. I prefer, since I have don’t have the time to research all these studies, to just not donate to the Komen foundation. There are other breast cancer organizations that I can donate to, if I choose.
BTW, check out stantoninus.org (Ithink it’s org or else .net) for a list of companies that support abrotion. It’s a couple of years old but still very interesting.

Peace,
Linda
 
Essentially, if there are other foundations that do the same good work without supporting abortion, then I should support those foundations instead. If there aren’t, then I should avoid passively cooperating in evil. This might mean writing a letter and asking that the foundation not support abortion. All this is presuming that there is a proportionate reason for me to support the good work of the foundation.
Is there an alternative charity that does just as good work as Susan G Komen?

If not would it be morally acceptable to support its good works but strongly voice your concern against the charity supporting PP?
 
I learned awhile back that even the nicest people become very defensive and angry when they’re challenged about their support to Komen and its support of PP. And I’m talking Catholic folks.
They sure don’t want to hear about it!

I, too have read the disclaimers that Komen puts out to press concerning the breast cancer/mammogram care that they fund with their PP grants.

I wish they’d take that money, buy an RV, equip it with the necessary mammo equipment, and drive it to the various rural areas and neighborhoods that need the free/reduced care. I’d donate to that, but never to Komen while they’re funding Planned Parenthood.

But Komen has a long-standing affiliation with Planned Parenthood and that’s probably not going to happen. The founder, Nancy Brinker (sister to Susan B. Komen, who passed away from BC) sat on the advisory board of the Texas Planned Parenthood less than a decade ago. So that tells they’re probably not ashamed of funding PP. What a shame.
 
Is there an alternative charity that does just as good work as Susan G Komen?

If not would it be morally acceptable to support its good works but strongly voice your concern against the charity supporting PP?
I’d say “the lesser evil or the greater good is always to be chosen” (St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, suppl, 47, 2). If you can find an alternative charity (eg. Catholic Relief Services), then I would think that would be the greater good. You might still strongly voice your concern against the charity supporting PP, and tell them that your choice instead is to give your money to another organization who does not support PP. 👍

See also: Pro-Life Professionals
 
Is there an alternative charity that does just as good work as Susan G Komen?

If not would it be morally acceptable to support its good works but strongly voice your concern against the charity supporting PP?
I don’t know of alternate charities, but I have not researched this.

I would say that it is moral to support this charity and let them know that you don’t approve of their supporting Planned Parenthood. This way, you’re supporting their good work formally and materially and eliminating any passive cooperation by voicing your concern. This seems to me like it would be very remote material cooperation.
 
Regarding alternate charities, we finally decided to do most of our giving via Catholic Relief Services.
 
I would simply say that God expects us to be responsible about where we invest our money and time. Since, we are laying up treasures in heaven, we want to be sure our works are silver and gold, not straw. Therefore, if a charity is engaged in something that we believe is displeasing to God, then we should not support it – there are many other charities that clearly please God.

1 Corinthians 3:11-13 (New International Version)

11For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, 13his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man’s work.
 
I believe so, but tell me your ideas, and how you would justify your position to another.
I would not bother justifying my opinion. Nobody’s business except my tax accountant where I do or do not donate my money.
 
I would not give anything to them as a “charity” giving money to another organization? That smells fishy to me. When you give to a certain charity, by law that charity has to use it for the purpose given. Doesn’t sound like cancer reasearch to turn around and give it to PPH. Give to ST. Jude or someone else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top