J
JRKH
Guest
And peace to you! I like the way you think.One of the reasons I started this thread was because of my curiosity about how much my presentation of the gospel might changeānot the method, but the message itselfāwere I to revert to the Catholic Church completely. Obviously references to imputation of righteousness would be eliminated, but Iād think most of it would stay the same, i.e., what God is like, what man is like (sin), who Jesus is, His death and resurrection, faith and repentance, counting the cost.
To expand on this just a bitā¦I think that ādifferencesā are more likely to show up in āfollow-upā conversations than in the proposed initial chat with the person you have just met.
One of the things I thought about relating to the initial encounter - and might effect the approach - is what brought on the inspiration to share the Gospel. Was it personal problems in the personās life that came up in casual conversation? Are they curious because they saw me make the sign of the cross before eating - or they noted I was praying the rosary while waiting for the plane?
That is why suggested that the general message I would try to convey would be āloveā - God Loves us - wants what is best for us Jesus came, lived with, and died for us out of Love. Love is the foundation for all of the ālaw and prophetsā etc.
These are things, built upon the sure foundation of Love, that ādraw one intoā Christ and are common across the Christian spectrum, though I am afraid that some seem to focus too much on other areas like āfaith aloneāā¦
Peace
James
