J
Jezra
Guest
It’s a simple question:
How would you judge humanity at this moment in time?
How would you judge humanity at this moment in time?
- Worth saving
- Not worth saving
I agree. We have come a long way in the last 70 years. Sure, the music has gone downhill since the 80-90’s, but our imagination knows no bounds. It’s all about how we choose to use it.Define “worth”. If you’re asking whether humanity deserves saving, we never did. If you’re asking if there’s something in there that can be redeemed, that’s always been true.
No one forced you to waste your time writing a post in this thread.If you are attempting to waste everyone’s time, you have succeeded admirably.
I thought the above was worth repeating. .God thinks we’re worth saving. Who am I to argue?
When we say “humanity” , we’re seldom looking at individuals. Humanity is collective in its implication. So what criteria are we given to judge by ? . . ." ‘Social structures of sin’ " perhaps (which our Catechism [1869] tells us are the “expression and effect of personal sins”) ? Since we know nothing much of what goes on in the minds of our brothers and sisters, it is better not to guess when it comes to their sins. Efforts at our own personal holiness must always be our first response and main aim.. . . How would you judge humanity at this moment in time?
Carl Orff considered that music became hopelessly corrupted with the development of polyphony during the Middle Ages. He advocted a return to the monody of the ancient world, and with it, a renewed sense of music as magic ritual. VERY strange.The music has gone downhill since the 1880’s to 90’s (some would say 1780’s).