Quoting Alan…
I agree you did not. I did the harshness imaginatory exploratory excursions – I am one of my own harshest critics. I will NOT allow you to be “far crazier” than me, though I think I can accept “at least in the same league.” I couldn’t challenge you to a paperwork contest, though, because most of my paperwork has been destroyed!
OK, I’ll settle for ‘in the same league’ altho that still leaves room for more, even more and most!
Quote:
I think I can insight the above since I am a woman and at times a most self confident and assertive woman…ever tried to win an argument with one of those
Quoting Alan…
No, and God willing I’ll have the good sense never to try.
Ahhh wisdom!
As far as the thread topic specifically, I didn’t get precisely through the terminology (I’m no theologian) but I liked the conclusion about satan being made good. That really makes a lot of sense to me. In a likewise fashion, everything – even alcohol and tobacco – that are part of God’s creation are good. (I’m saying that not to sidetrack but to emphasize the point)
Oh Boy! we are moving into the area of theology methinks

… I subscribe to all things in moderation, if I don’t consistently do so! I also hold that everything created or which God has permitted to be created is good…it is our usage, attitudes and perspectives that can introduce negative morality.
Undoubtedly Satan and the fallen angels nature was created good inclusive of free will and superior intelligence…this nature apparently became intrinsically evil through their sin which did flow from their free will and superior intelligence. Perhaps they realized that if they lost their battle to overcome God the consequences would be most dire…they were! Hell! In their pride I think they really thought that they could overcome God and victory over God was assured. WRONG!
I still don’t get where the “evil” comes from, though, unless it was through the Law. Before the law there was no conviction, so was there evil? Did original sin change our nature, or did the Law specify the parts of our nature that original sin “enabled” or “exposed” perhaps? I’m not trying to dispense with technical terms, but if I can’t confidently paraphrase in terms I understand then I fear I don’t know it with the proper terms at all.
As I see things fromt this worn armchair (correctly identified as a disclaimer!

) God’s Will always was and always will be. God’s Will created our own and the angel’s free will and in the case of the latter this was coupled with a superior intelligence to ours. When Satan and its followers chose to act against God’s Will which was that they were subject to His Will, the thing and it’s its chose to live forever more outside of God’s Will … hence Hell. The Law per se comes into existence as God reveals the basic structure of His Will to humanity…the first expression of which were His Instructions to our first parents re the tree of the knowledge of good and evil…Satan tempted Eve, of her free will she acted against God’s Instructions…then she tempts Adam to do so who also disobeys.
It has more or less lately been of some interest to me that Eve is tricked by a far superior intelligence in Satan; whereas Adam is tricked only by a woman after all!

Edit: Actually the very first expression of God’s Will to humanity was “increase and multiply and fill the earth” something which I heard a priest state with a wicked and mischievious glint in his eye “and a commandment which priests and nuns break every day” (now that is only a joke…like John, I dont want to be screaming “Not the stake, please spare me the stake! anything but the stake” (or something akin to that!) in my sleep!
Satan’s sin was one of pride in that it really thought that it could overcome God…whereas Adam and Eve it seems to me did not have the insight of the superior intelligence of Satan, hence their consequence were not as dire as that of Satan and the fallen angels. In fact the consequences where Adam and Eve are concerned include a saviour in time. Satan is precluded this and I tend to think because the far superior intelligence did insight the consequences if it failed, pride told the thing it could not. WRONG! Hatred of God comes from the fact that it was indeed wrong. Nothing more stumbles and stings pride than to declare it is absolutely right beyond doubt and then to discover it is absolutely wrong beyond doubt. Undoubtedly the pride of Satan etc. was such that their failure produced more than a stumble and sting…it produced hatred.
My take on matters…from thin ice…regards - Barb
