Human Genetic Profile on Eucharistic Miracle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faith1960
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
GEddie said:
I don’t know whether to put faith in the NCR or not. I’ve heard conflicting things about them.

There seem to be however, a snowstorm of alleged EM’s reported. Around 2000, I heard of one from a mission church near Austin. Supposedly, the “specimens” were taken to Rome to be investigated, but nothing was heard about it since.

ICXC NIKA
Click to expand...
We had a EM display at our parish and a nearby parish. I believe some of them but not all of them.
 
mikekle said:
This is an interesting thing, and from what I recall, 1900 yrs is relatively young when it comes to DNA, I believe they can still find intact DNA from much much older things if it was preserved in an adequate manner, I even read one article awhile back they were able to find DNA from something like bone marrow from a dinosaur bone, that had been encased in the ‘right’ material over the years.

I dont think we are at the technological level to attempt a clone of Jesus, from this sort of thing, if that were even possible in the first place, but I do think there will be some big discoveries once we understand the findings on this a bit more, if we could see the exact DNA strand from JEsus himself, something tells me it would answer alot of questions for us about what is today a mystery.
Click to expand...
We are jumping the gun to even assume any DNA in the sample belonged to Jesus. The host was touched by the bare hands of the priest, placed on the tongue of another human, dumped on the floor for several hours, picked up and soaked in a dish of water. And that was all after consecration. What happened before it was consecrated?
 
robertmidwest said:
We are jumping the gun to even assume any DNA in the sample belonged to Jesus. The host was touched by the bare hands of the priest, placed on the tongue of another human, dumped on the floor for several hours, picked up and soaked in a dish of water. And that was all after consecration. What happened before it was consecrated?
Click to expand...
The DNA was from the heart muscle not the Host prior to its change.
 
Faith1960 said:
The DNA was from the heart muscle not the Host prior to its change.
Click to expand...
The DNA in the sample may have come from a source prior to consecration. It may have come from the priest, it may have come from the communicant, it may have come from some debris on the floor, it may have come from the person who found the Host laying on the floor. That is my point. We can’t jump to the conclusion that we have Jesus’ DNA.
 
robertmidwest said:
The DNA in the sample may have come from a source prior to consecration. It may have come from the priest, it may have come from the communicant, it may have come from some debris on the floor, it may have come from the person who found the Host laying on the floor. That is my point. We can’t jump to the conclusion that we have Jesus’ DNA.
Click to expand...
Do you believe ANY EMs are real? Forgive me if you already answered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top