X
Xantippe
Guest
I showed this thread to my husband and he pointed me to the Summa Theologica.
newadvent.org/summa/5064.htm#article1
“Reply to Objection 2. The wife has no power over her husband’s body, except as is consistent with the welfare of his person, as stated above. Wherefore if she go beyond this in her demands, it is not a request for the debt, but an unjust exaction; and for this reason the husband is not bound to satisfy her.”
In other words, if a spouse is demanding the marital debt when that will cause the other spouse physical harm, this demand is not reasonable and does not need to be complied with.
newadvent.org/summa/5064.htm#article1
“Reply to Objection 2. The wife has no power over her husband’s body, except as is consistent with the welfare of his person, as stated above. Wherefore if she go beyond this in her demands, it is not a request for the debt, but an unjust exaction; and for this reason the husband is not bound to satisfy her.”
In other words, if a spouse is demanding the marital debt when that will cause the other spouse physical harm, this demand is not reasonable and does not need to be complied with.