Blue Eyed Lady said:
“I think that this whole line of conversation is straying from the OP’s original question and is bordering on uncharitable. We cannot make these suppositions about this man based on his religion alone. You cannot say that he would do whatever his family says, because you don’t know him or them. My family is uncomfortable with many things that I do, and I do them anyway. My husband’s family is uncomfortable with almost everything about how we live, but did that mean we got married in the church? Heck no. Will their feelings prompt us to baptize our child and/or raise them in the Catholic faith. No. Making statements about this man’s honor and dignity when it comes to honoring commitments or supposing that because of his religion he will be a bad husband and turn over all control to his family is crazy, not founded on the facts that we have, and not helpful to the OP.”
We do know that the cousin-in-law has already decided to go with a canonically problematic wedding arrangement in order to avoid making her husband-to-be’s family uncomfortable. So, it looks like it’s not at all unfair to say that his family and his family’s traditions are exerting a fairly strong gravitational pull and that that gravitational pull will, with all likelihood, grow even more powerful as the years go by.
This may be very unfair to the cousin-in-law’s intended, but there are many, many examples of Western women who married a Muslim guy who seemed very Westernized and then discovered, after they’d married and had children and perhaps moved back to the old country, that the Westernization was only skin deep. That has happened so many times that it is most prudent to assume that that is a likely outcome.
nypost.com/2013/09/21/my-life-of-hell-in-an-afghan-harem/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_Mahmoody
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Rodriguez
“In all honesty, when it comes to the OP, how the woman and her fiance choose to handle their marriage and religious differences does not matter.”
I think they’ll be very lucky if they are allowed to hash things out by themselves, but if they are, that’s really the best possible outcome.
“All she can and should do is ascertain whether or not she can in good conscience allow her son to participate. I encourage her to sit down with the woman and politely say that she isn’t comfortable having her son participate unless everything is in line with church teaching. If it isn’t , she needs to pull her son out. If it is, then no worries. But I would rather have my family member just come to me and be upfront with a “Hey, I’m afraid I was put on the spot earlier at dinner, so I’d like to clarify. I can only allow my son to be your ring bearer if he won’t be participating in something that is against our faith. So unless your marriage will be valid and in line with church teaching, I’m afraid he can’t be a part of the wedding”. I would respect that a lot.”
And that, dear BEL, is why you are an amazing person.
“Now, if someone came to me and said “You need to have your fiance make XYZ promises in front of his parents so that you know you can trust him” I would flip. That is absolutely no one else’s concern whatsoever and if someone insinuated that my soon to be husband should not be fully trusted because of his religion, despite the fact that I am the one that knows who he is as a person, that would have a lasting impact on my relationship with that person.”
You don’t really know who the person is until you marry them and have kids with them, and the Muslim case is particularly problematic, as there is a strong cultural assumption that children will be raised Muslim. By not doing that, the cousin-in-law’s future husband will be swimming against a very powerful cultural tide.