S
sgalvanek
Guest
John Higgins:
Compare that to NFP. In this case we attempt to influence the consequence of sex (pregnancy), by using the virtue of temperance to modify when and how much we have sex, vs. tossing the contents of the condom in the trash after partaking of the pleasure of the act.
Pretty gross analogy, but you can see how one works with the design God has built into us and how the other works contrary to it.
Steve
The difference between NFP and artificial contraception is akin to the difference between controlling your weight (consequence of eating), by reducing how much and when you eat via temperance. Vs. Controlling your weight by becoming bulimic and vomiting up the contents of your stomach after bingeing - partaking of the pleasure then disposing of the product of the act.Since this thread concerns the hypothetical, then even with contraception every marital act is, in fact, open to the possibility of life. So, apart from abortifacient contraceptives, what’s the beef?
John
Compare that to NFP. In this case we attempt to influence the consequence of sex (pregnancy), by using the virtue of temperance to modify when and how much we have sex, vs. tossing the contents of the condom in the trash after partaking of the pleasure of the act.
Pretty gross analogy, but you can see how one works with the design God has built into us and how the other works contrary to it.
Steve