T
thiscatholickid
Guest
Something happened earlier this week that bothered me. I was talking to a new friend, a girl, that (and I could very well be wrong) seemed to exhibit some interest in me. I think this can be identified by well, excessive questions? Questions that seem to stray from normal friendly chatter.
One of which was “Are you Christian?”, I already knew before getting to know her that she was a very devout Christian. Baptist, I think…
And just like every single one of you, I have very often answered such a question with a simple “Yes.”
It is after all, true. I am a Christian. But for some reason that time I couldn’t do it. I think it was situational, and based on my knowledge about her.
I knew she was a very well versed and theological Christian. Someone who knows the whats-what when it comes to religion. So I felt that if I said I was a Christian, I would be subscribing to the conventional understanding of the word, Christian. In other words, subscribing to a huge list of beliefs and doctrines that I find wholly and entirely untrue as a Catholic.
So I said, “No, I’m a Roman Catholic.”
The second part isn’t what bothered me, the first part was what stuck. I had said No.
Not, “Yes, I’m a Roman Catholic.”
Ever since then conversation with her died down, as I think she took my answer as the answer of a die-hard Mary worshipping idolatrous Catholic
But even though she’s long gone, my answer has still stuck. Did I make a mistake? Or did I stand up for my faith? After my initial meditation I finally decided that I had erred. Roman Catholicism isn’t just Christian, it is REAL Christianity. The beginning, the first Christians.
But then I had a shift at my work. (I work at Starbucks.) It was right before Easter, and a lady in the Drive-Thru handed me a pamphlet. It was inviting me to a Easter Pancake Breakfast at a local Christian Church.
On it, it showed an unrealistically cartoonish picture of Jesus, his arms widespread around the world. The casual depiction was somewhat disturbing. I’m not advocating always showing Jesus bleeding on a cross, but something about the unnatural smile seemed more like a political caricature than an image of Our Lord.
As I tucked the pamphlet into my pocket, I saw the words "All welcome, men, women, children regardless of race or sexuality.
Underneath it were three images. Gender images such as the kind found on public restroom signs. A man and woman holding hands, then a man and a man, and then two women.
All throughout that shift I asked myself, “Am I a Christian?”
The answer would always come back irrevocably “YES!” And then whisper back sullenly “…and No.”
This is really bothering me even weeks after. What is the greater problem here? Showing ecumenism by accepting others, or disregarding identity by generalizing.
Sincerely,
A Confused Roman Catholic
One of which was “Are you Christian?”, I already knew before getting to know her that she was a very devout Christian. Baptist, I think…
And just like every single one of you, I have very often answered such a question with a simple “Yes.”
It is after all, true. I am a Christian. But for some reason that time I couldn’t do it. I think it was situational, and based on my knowledge about her.
I knew she was a very well versed and theological Christian. Someone who knows the whats-what when it comes to religion. So I felt that if I said I was a Christian, I would be subscribing to the conventional understanding of the word, Christian. In other words, subscribing to a huge list of beliefs and doctrines that I find wholly and entirely untrue as a Catholic.
So I said, “No, I’m a Roman Catholic.”
The second part isn’t what bothered me, the first part was what stuck. I had said No.
Not, “Yes, I’m a Roman Catholic.”
Ever since then conversation with her died down, as I think she took my answer as the answer of a die-hard Mary worshipping idolatrous Catholic
But even though she’s long gone, my answer has still stuck. Did I make a mistake? Or did I stand up for my faith? After my initial meditation I finally decided that I had erred. Roman Catholicism isn’t just Christian, it is REAL Christianity. The beginning, the first Christians.
But then I had a shift at my work. (I work at Starbucks.) It was right before Easter, and a lady in the Drive-Thru handed me a pamphlet. It was inviting me to a Easter Pancake Breakfast at a local Christian Church.
On it, it showed an unrealistically cartoonish picture of Jesus, his arms widespread around the world. The casual depiction was somewhat disturbing. I’m not advocating always showing Jesus bleeding on a cross, but something about the unnatural smile seemed more like a political caricature than an image of Our Lord.
As I tucked the pamphlet into my pocket, I saw the words "All welcome, men, women, children regardless of race or sexuality.
Underneath it were three images. Gender images such as the kind found on public restroom signs. A man and woman holding hands, then a man and a man, and then two women.
All throughout that shift I asked myself, “Am I a Christian?”
The answer would always come back irrevocably “YES!” And then whisper back sullenly “…and No.”
This is really bothering me even weeks after. What is the greater problem here? Showing ecumenism by accepting others, or disregarding identity by generalizing.
Sincerely,
A Confused Roman Catholic