J
JReducation
Guest
Mike,Actually, I would say that the single life is the least understood, although probably you were meaning amongst consecrated forms of life (sorry if I’m nitpicking!).
I also get this a lot, and unfortunately it does get me down a little sometimes - especially when people look disappointed when I explain to them that I’m not a priest and not going to be a priest. Sometimes this is followed by sympathy inasmuch as its assumed that I tried but failed the interview.
I have to say that in my own order my lack of vocation to ordination was positively received, although there was from a few people a slight sense of puzzlement as to how else I might fill my time. I don’t actually think there’s a shortage of work to do in the world, however!
And JR, thank you very much for beginning this thread, which I’ve found very heartening. I think maybe there is a sea change going on in religious life, with more men called to the life of brotherhood as opposed to priesthood than might have been the case a couple of decades ago. This seems to be happening in many male orders and congregations, even if only in a relative sense. I think it’s important that we articulate that experience as widely as we can.
Fraternal greetings to all.
The pendalum is definitely swinging in many religious families. I can speak about my own Franciscan family best. Currently there are 1.7 million Franciscans around the world in 114 nations. I believe we are the largest religious family in the Church, but am not sure about that. The interesting part is that less than 30,000 Franciscans are priests. The rest are brothers and sisters, both secular and regular.
Just focussing on the men who are secular and regular brothers, they are renewing the Franciscan family. Every few years a new community of Franciscans emerge. They range from secular men living in private vows, in communities that range from contemplative to socially active. But they are intimately related to each other, to the order,to St.Francis and ultimately to God and his Church.
The secular brothers are even more of a mysery than the regular brothers. In our house we have both. I’m a regular brother (religious) and we have secular brothers in private vows as well. People often wonder if the secular brothrs failed the test or something. But it is always exciting to see the light of comprehension in the eyes of a young man when he realizes that Christ may call him to live for him and that there is no single path that Christ uses, but multiple paths, each according to what is best for us and for the Church.
This is what has to be kept in mind. God calls us to posess him via the path where such posession of the beloved is possible for us, not the next person over.
Fraternally,
Br. JR