R
Ridgerunner
Guest
Sometimes the “community sense” varies from parish to parish. Not so very long ago, parishes were pretty “ethnic”. There were Irish parishes and Polish parishes and German parishes and Slovak parishes and so on. The different immigrant groups tended to settle in the same neighborhoods, and of course they had a greater sense of “community” than in urban areas now where Catholics move to some locale, don’t know a single person, and might or might not have anything in common with them. Oftentimes in urban areas, people have their own set of friends. But there are always ways. Church choir is one of them. Those always need people.
In rural parishes nowadays, it’s a little more like the old urban parishes used to be. Many of the parishioners have been there for generations, are related to each other, etc.
There was a time in this part of the country when a lot of Mormons came in. It was a sort of sub-group of Salt Lake LDS who believed that the Second Coming would be in SW Mo instead of NW Mo the way most of them believe. After some dealings with them, I decided there was a lot more “fellowship” exhibited toward potential converts than there was among the Mormons themselves.
I realize someone might be offended by my saying that, but I could say a lot more, including their “taxation” of members, but won’t.
To be an “equal opportunity” skeptic, this part of the country is Bible Belt all the way. Lots of those churches, particularly the big evangelical ones, are the same way. You’re their best friend until you join and the minister decides you’re not contributing your “fair share”. Then everything changes, and you’re shunned. I have known Mormons who got “shunned” and admitted it to me. “Jack Mormons”, they’re called.
I would be very skeptical about super-friendly approaches.
In rural parishes nowadays, it’s a little more like the old urban parishes used to be. Many of the parishioners have been there for generations, are related to each other, etc.
There was a time in this part of the country when a lot of Mormons came in. It was a sort of sub-group of Salt Lake LDS who believed that the Second Coming would be in SW Mo instead of NW Mo the way most of them believe. After some dealings with them, I decided there was a lot more “fellowship” exhibited toward potential converts than there was among the Mormons themselves.
I realize someone might be offended by my saying that, but I could say a lot more, including their “taxation” of members, but won’t.
To be an “equal opportunity” skeptic, this part of the country is Bible Belt all the way. Lots of those churches, particularly the big evangelical ones, are the same way. You’re their best friend until you join and the minister decides you’re not contributing your “fair share”. Then everything changes, and you’re shunned. I have known Mormons who got “shunned” and admitted it to me. “Jack Mormons”, they’re called.
I would be very skeptical about super-friendly approaches.