Heb 6 where it talks about those who fall away can never again come back…
Help me understand that as it does trouble me.
Ty
I’m not in favor of Thistle’s quote. Haydock is really being borderline when it comes to reasoning…
Hebrews 5:12 “you
need to be taught again the first principles”
The passage is consistent, logically, with the problem of what these apostates are doing when they have fallen away. They are running around saying Jesus deserved the crucifixion as a logical consequence of their disbelief. If he is not the messiah, he is a liar and a blasphemer. False prophets, according to the law of Moses, deserve death.
Thus, where it is written – “they crucify him again to themselves” and “holding him up to public shame
for their own ends” – it means what they are
doing immediately upon apostasy.
While they do this, it is impossible to argue with them. As Jesus says elsewhere, don’t throw your pearls before swine – they will trample you underfoot.
In vs. 6:7, the sentence starts with “For”; that word is equivalent to “because”. It is in THAT verse, where the logic is expounded as to why they are unsuitable to have a change of heart.
A patch of land full of briers must be burned before it can be re-planted. The briers themselves, even if small, are such a disaster as to bring about the disgust of the owner – and his curses. However, the REASON given in Vs 7, clearly has the exception – if burnt, the land can be replanted; He doesn’t say it is cursed, but it is “near” to being cursed. Thus, his previous sentence can be seen to be customary Jewish black and white phrasing with a
partial contradiction to clarify it’s meaning.
As a general principle, whenever two contradicting ideas are juxtaposed within a few sentences of each other – the Jewish writer
means ONLY the idea which is not excluded by the correcting contradiction.
Consider again:
The church itself says in an infallible Oecumenical council-- “Baptism is a laborious form of baptism”. Then note – St. Paul speaks of baptism(S). (6:2) I don’t see how repentance through confession is ruled out in this passage – for Paul is speaking of all of them;
The original convert had to be in a particular state to even hear the word of God (the seed planted in the ground???). Clearly, if the ground is full of briers – it isn’t ready to be planted. Thus, while they run around cursing Jesus – they can’t be converted; but only refuted (and at one’s own peril.)
Assuredly, original baptism can’t be repeated is true; but that’s not the only issue in Hebrew’s 6. sheesh.
Hebrews 6:9
Beloved, of you we have better confidence that does not stop short of your salvation
even when we speak to you as
we are speaking now.
Clearly, St. Paul is threatening them with damnation because they are nearly apostate – but he hopes for them.