H
Holly3278
Guest
Hi everyone. A friend of mine uses this verse to rationalize obeying the Old Testament law which we are free of in the New Testament. How do I refute this? 
I have no idea what she believes. She is a Messianic Jew so I guess she no longer believes in ritual sacrifice.I’m not sure of the scripture referances, but we are still held accountable for PART of the law (ex. the ten commandments).
Paul makes a reference in the book of Galations to the fact the circumcision is no longer required. Gal 5:6 says For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. I would reccomend reading the entire chapter to get the scripture in it’s full context. However, from what I understand, we are no longer bound by the ritual laws. Does your friend think we still have to sacrafice bulls and lambs and such? We ARE still required to fallow the MORAL laws. It’s a sin to commit adultry, it is not a sin to pick up a piece of garbage on the sabbath. it is a sin to steal, it is not a sin for a women who is on her cycle to leave the house.
There are all sorts of old testamate rituals reguarding cleanlyness and such that we are no longer held to.
I’m no Bible scholar, so I’m sure someone else on here will have some better scriptures for you.
This is the Bible verse she is refering to.Hi everyone. A friend of mine uses this verse to rationalize obeying the Old Testament law which we are free of in the New Testament. How do I refute this?![]()
You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment.' **22**] But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says, You fool!’ shall be liable to the hell of fire.