However, on reading documents both from ‘before’ Vatican 2 and also including (to their credit) many writers of the period through today, the focus, the practice, and the reason for wearing a veil had nothing to do with sexism, second class citizenship, male dominance and oppression. . .
but rather reflected the woman’s hair as her glory, and (like the veiling of the Ark of the Covenant), the practice was felt to reflect the innate sacredness and sanctity of that which was being covered.
**Rather than a woman being ‘oppressed’ by her veil, she was being elevated. She was being acknowledged as worthy and sacred, and she covered herself for acknowledgement of this, as well as to show her understanding of the fitness of the proper setting for her ‘glory’. **
Just because people choose to make (wrong) interpretations regarding ‘sexist’ veiling does not mean the interpretations were true. And just because there may have been individuals, or eras, where people did make those interpretations and because of them acted poorly does not make the reality of veiling wrong.
We do not blame the teaching of the Church that abortion is wrong as the reason that so many abort, because of whatever ‘interpretaton’ is put on the Church’s reason for teaching such (usually of course it is derided as being anti-woman, anti-choice, impossible to adhere to, failing to take ‘other factors’ into account, interpreted by MEN and thus biased, etc.)