I don't understand Thomas Aquinas' arguments for natural law theory, help

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheDefaultMan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wesrock said:
As I said it depends on your philosophy of nature. Reality as understood by Aristotleanism or Thomism is very much not indifferent towards good and evil, and evil is not a possible nature as the word nature is used in either system.
Click to expand...
So there is no criminal, someone who enjoys killing?
 
STT said:
40.png
Wesrock:
As I said it depends on your philosophy of nature. Reality as understood by Aristotleanism or Thomism is very much not indifferent towards good and evil, and evil is not a possible nature as the word nature is used in either system.
Click to expand...
So there is no criminal, someone who enjoys killing?
Click to expand...
Of course there are.
 
As I said…
Wesrock said:
and evil is not a possible nature as the word nature is used in either system.
Click to expand...
Their natures are good. What is morally evil is that they choose to act contrary to them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top