F
FAB
Guest
Actually Deacons can and do give blessings…I have received blessings from EMHC’s and Deacons, before I joined the Church. I was unaware that this was for Priests only. Do you have a reference for this?
Thanks
Actually Deacons can and do give blessings…I have received blessings from EMHC’s and Deacons, before I joined the Church. I was unaware that this was for Priests only. Do you have a reference for this?
Thanks
It’s important to only give Communion to Catholics. If you know that someone is a non Catholic, next time don’t give them Communion, because they’re not prepared by going to Confession so it’s actualy spiritually dangerous for them. I know your intention wasn’t bad though and you probably just didn’t know what to do. Next time, you could say something like “I’m sorry but the Church only allows Catholics in a state of grace to receive Communion”. Then later, you can talk to your friend. Or, if you know that a non Catholic friend is coming to Mass with you, you can talk to them ahead of time and clarify the Church’s teaching. It’s not to keep people out, but to prevent them from receiving unworthily, because preparations like Confession and the fast (and being Catholic) are needed. Since we all become united as the Church in the Eucharist, there needs to be agreement between all its members or we’re sinning against unity. That is why only Catholics are allowed to Communion.…and I feel awful about it! I really don’t know what to think!
I’m an EMHC at my parish, and I attend a Catholic high school. The entire school had mass today, and I distributed communion.
A good friend of mine, a Baptist, approached me in the communion line. I started to just say a blessing, but he had his hands out. He didn’t move. I wasn’t in a position to talk with him about it, so I gave it to him, and moved on.
I’m really troubled with this. The Eucharist is supposed to be received by Catholics only, as it is the true body of Christ, as our faith states, correct? This has me thinking otherwise, (which I dislike) If any person can come and receive it, what keeps it from simply being a symbolic cracker? This didn’t mean anything to him; he doesn’t believe in the real presence.
Thanks for any help…
No one may share the Eucharist with us unless he believes that what we teach is true, unless he is washed in the regenerating waters of baptism for the remission of his sins, and unless he lives in accordance with the principles given us by Christ.
The reason it’s not a symbol is because even if your friend does not believe in Christ’s Real Presence there, it does not change the objective reality that the Eucharist is His Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity. Our beliefs do not change what is objectively true. Our part is to receive worthily and with faith.We do not consume the eucharistic bread and wine as if it were ordinary food and drink, for we have been taught that as Jesus Christ our Savior became a man of flesh and blood by the power of the Word of God, so also the food that our flesh and blood assimilates for its nourishment becomes the flesh and blood of the incarnate Jesus by the power of his own words contained in the prayer of thanksgiving.
I would have to agree… I don’t want to beat up Alex over this either, and I don’t doubt his intentions, but it’s strange that the school allowed this at all.He has been given a great responsibility. With great responsibility comes great accountability.
High school kids should not be EMHCs. Period. I don’t think they should be allowed in the first place, but that’s a discussion for another thread. In this case we have kids distributing Holy Communion - I think it’s wrong. Very wrong. I’m not going to go into this because I don’t want to beat Alex up over this. But this is absolutely NOT just a passing flippant issue.
~Liza
It could be the logistics. The school could have a large number of students, there could have been other people present (maybe, the Mass I attended today was also our parish school Mass), and teachers, etc. may not always know or have fresh in their minds the list of students who are not Catholics. I find it incredibly feasible that a student could have gotten into the Communion line easily and no one would have given it a second thought - except the EMHC who knew he wasn’t Catholic.I would have to agree… I don’t want to beat up Alex over this either, and I don’t doubt his intentions, but it’s strange that the school allowed this at all.
As I recall, Blessed JPII gave Holy Communion to Tony Blair in 1994, and Mr.Blair has converted to Catholicism now.You knowingly gave communicated a non-Catholic? Well first get yourself into the confessional. This is a very grave and serious matter. After that you must resign from your position as an EMHC. You simply cannot be trusted to perform the function. What you did was aid the desecration of His Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, with full knowledge of what was happening!
And nor should you have tried to give a blessing. Do not try and succeed your authority.
Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion cannot bestow blessings, as that is beyond their scope during the Mass. Consider the words in Sancrosanctum Concilium:I have received blessings from EMHC’s and Deacons, before I joined the Church. I was unaware that this was for Priests only. Do you have a reference for this?
Thanks
The purpose of the Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion is only to distribute the Eucharist. Something else to note is that blessing persons during reception of Holy Communion is an innovation and a liturgical abuse.
- In liturgical celebrations each person, minister or layman, who has an office to perform, should do all of, but only, those parts which pertain to his office by the nature of the rite and the principles of liturgy.
There are instances during the Order of the Mass when priest will bless the gathered community, but at Eucharistic reception is not one of them. This only compounds the situation when one looks at an EMHC because if a priest is not supposed to bless at this time, then an EMHC has no business doing this at all.
- Therefore no other person, even if he be a priest, may add, remove, or change anything in the liturgy on his own authority.
And…don’t worry about the judgemental comments from some. This is what makes people leave the Church.
At the Catholic funerals I have attended the priest has always explained at the beginning of the Mass that only Catholics (in good standing) are to receive.Dear DudeAlex,
TO your friend is probebly doesn’t mean anything, but for him to recieve to body of Christ does not harm. As a deacon at funerals and weddings, I know protestants will recieve. It is something that happens because they don’t understand the signifcants ot the body and blood of Christ, and look at it as a act of rememberance.
Talk to your friend in a good mannor. Explainn to him the meaning of the Eucharist, and that he put you in a bad spot. It could prove to be a good chance for evangelization, a possible turning point in his life the look at Catholism as his faith.
Peace,
Dcn. FAB
I was taught that the communion line is no place for a struggle. You tried to get him to not receive…but you can’t have a full on argument about it right there. It would be a good idea to talk to your priest about it.As an EMHC, your task is to administer the Eucharist, not to make judgements. If someone approaches you for Holy Communion, it is not within your brief to refuse it. If their reception of the Eucharist is sinful, it is their sin not yours.
It’s a shame that this wasn’t done at this young EM’s Mass. He would have been spared the the bad situation he was put into.At the Catholic funerals I have attended the priest has always explained at the beginning of the Mass that only Catholics (in good standing) are to receive.
He recommends that those who will not be receiving stay in the pew and pray.
Quite frankly I’m shockedAs a deacon at funerals and weddings, I know protestants will recieve. It is something that happens because they don’t understand the signifcants ot the body and blood of Christ, and look at it as a act of rememberance.