L
Luvz2travel
Guest
I don’t think you can be fired on hersay unless she had written proof like and email or some such evidence. I would talk to an attorney.
Actually she talked to an attorney and they told her she didn’t have a case.I don’t think you can be fired on hersay unless she had written proof like and email or some such evidence. I would talk to an attorney.
Blame your friend for getting you fired, your company only did what every employer I’ve ever had would have done after such a phone call.Former friend was angry with me and called our corporate office to tell them every juicy detail of how I vented to her. She and I had talked (privately) about our jobs (we’re both in human services).
You are right Chev, in the States truthfulness is always a defense to defamation (Sometimes it is a defense sometimes it is part of the prima facia case). Thus the company could not win a suit for slander against her. However, they could drag her to court and make broke through legal fees before the case gets dismissed.Cara, everybody who’s withholding payment, firing someone, denying to perform a promise etc. will always cite a lot of “legal” reasons, including some more things he could do but will not. In some cases that person will indeed have the law on his side but in most cases it’s bogus. I can’t fathom how they could possibly prove slander in your case and IMHO they are crossing and have crossed the line of defamation in the dismissal grounds they gave you but I must stress I’m not an American lawyer and I don’t even know which state you’re in, so I can’t give you reliable advice.
Yeah, I’m just worried about some judge deciding that if it’s an at will state, then hearing a case based on defamatory nature of stated reasons would supposedly impede the employer’s freedom to terminate the contract (because it would constitute review of the employer’s laying off procedures). But if employees have records that go with them to new employers, then I believe this should be enough to make a judge give in and hear the case. After all, they could state “stealing doughnuts and secretly sabotaging the coffee machine” at impunity if they were allowed to write whatever they want without fear of lawsuits.You are right Chev, in the States truthfulness is always a defense to defamation (Sometimes it is a defense sometimes it is part of the prima facia case). Thus the company could not win a suit for slander against her. However, they could drag her to court and make broke through legal fees before the case gets dismissed.
Because it is an at will state, they might not have even sighted a cause, (causing legal issues).
It seems they have discussed your personal record openly in the company. That is extremely inappropriate and probably violates confidentiality laws concerning your work record.Thank you for all of your support. I did not sleep last night!
Talked to a legal guy. This is an at-will employment state; they can fire for me for pretty much anything. My company’s point is that I slandered them “to the community.” They “can no longer trust” me. They could have taken me to court for slander, but according to my boss, she talked them out of it because I’m pregnant. :doh2:
Nothing I had said was untrue. I should have taken my concernes (HIPPA-confidentiality breaking and inappropriate behavior) up the food chain with documentation. I was considering it here and there. I should have. How do you go to your boss when she is one of the people doing stuff? I went to her boss about this and those two reminded me how tight they are.
I guess things got said to co-workers (there are no boundaries there). My last afternoon at work a couple of co-workers were talking about some… uh… sexual matters. They saw me and stopped and said sarcastically, "Oh, we should practice better boundaries. I would hate for the appropriateness Nazis to get us. Don’t want a human resources report on this."
Well, I just applied for unemployment online. We’ll see how things go. I was up all night. This is a huge stress. Part of me was thinking, How come I decide to go to church, study the Bible, take this Catholic correspondance course, start praying regularly… and all this happens!!!
You know, the thoughts we have in those dark, exhausted, lonely hours.
Thanks for you kind words and support. I am seriously appreciating it.
Cara
But they didn’t fire her for being pregnant, they fired her for talking about her employer’s practices. Employers are allowed to fire people for non-discriminatory reasons. Being pregnant doesn’t protect you from being fired for any reason whatsoever.Pregnant women are a protected class. You probably have a lawsuit right there.
However, if they let her go “for cause” this could prevent her from receiving unemployment or from getting another job, on only the statements of one person who is an interested party. You are right, it shouldn’t be for the pregnancy, but rather for the unsubstantiated claims for cause, (if they actually cited a cause).But they didn’t fire her for being pregnant, they fired her for talking about her employer’s practices. Employers are allowed to fire people for non-discriminatory reasons. Being pregnant doesn’t protect you from being fired for any reason whatsoever.
It seems to me the OP admitted that she said things she shouldn’t have to her “friend.” Her friend ratted her out and her employer fired her. The employer is not at fault here, as far as I can tell.
I agree the OP should file for unemployment, but suing the company? Just because she’s pregnant and could maybe make an UNTRUE accusation that they discriminated against her for being pregnant? I disagree with that on principle.
It depends on how they fill out the unemployment report they get when she applies. If they simply check the “Do not dispute” box it’s a done deal. If they try to claim it was with cause they have to document the cause, specify where the violation was covered in their employee hand book, the attempts to rectify, number of verbal and written warnings and a lot of other details. Most employers won’t go through that effort unless it’s a very clear cut and easy case to verify. Usually the ones we “fight” are “Employee quit showing up for work, employee attacked a fellow employee” etc. In Kansas even if you’re fired for cause it doesn’t prevent you from drawing unemployment, it just prevents the employer from being “charged” for the unemployment that person collects.However, if they let her go “for cause” this could prevent her from receiving unemployment or from getting another job, on only the statements of one person who is an interested party. You are right, it shouldn’t be for the pregnancy, but rather for the unsubstantiated claims for cause, (if they actually cited a cause).
I would agree with this… Someone is talking in HR way more than they should… and see, when people start talking about what they heard… that’s called retaliation… you’ve been retaliated against for talking… Bullying… IMOIt seems they have discussed your personal record openly in the company. That is extremely inappropriate and probably violates confidentiality laws concerning your work record.
Also, while “at-will” means you can be let go for any reason or even no reason, if they give a reason, it must be substantiated. If their reason is unsubstantiated, they will have to recant.
If they were in violation of HIPAA, that needs to be reported appropriately (not in the unemployment interview since it might show you to be “disgruntled” thereby harming your cause and reputation).
Unless there is some sort of written clause in her employment agreement that she can’t discuss corp. policy… that’s generally not a big deal. How is TRUTHFULLY talking about corp. policy defaming? It’s not like she shared a secret formula… and see in CA, where I’m from… if you don’t have a wickedly solid reason to fire a person… and that you don’t like what you heard she said… isn’t one… She could have been having a hormonal moment… something to be expected from a PG woman… In the same way you can’t fire a person when you know they have a drinking problem. You know they are disabled… Even if they show up drunk. Now you can fire them if they refuse treatment and such (granted I base my opinion of old working knowledge… have been out of the field for a while.) I’ll tell you, I had a boss that wanted to fire one of our PG employees. In the end, he just didn’t like her. That I know for a fact. I had to get our VERY talented lawyer in on the deal… who literally said my boss was inviting the biggest lawsuit ever.But they didn’t fire her for being pregnant, they fired her for talking about her employer’s practices. Employers are allowed to fire people for non-discriminatory reasons. Being pregnant doesn’t protect you from being fired for any reason whatsoever.
It seems to me the OP admitted that she said things she shouldn’t have to her “friend.” Her friend ratted her out and her employer fired her. The employer is not at fault here, as far as I can tell.
I agree the OP should file for unemployment, but suing the company? Just because she’s pregnant and could maybe make an UNTRUE accusation that they discriminated against her for being pregnant? I disagree with that on principle.
With all due respect but would you fire an employee without summoning him up to give him a chance to explain whatever some “helpful” person told him on the phone? And would you use accusations like “spreading malicious lies” lightly?Blame your friend for getting you fired, your company only did what every employer I’ve ever had would have done after such a phone call.
New Testament (just read this the other night) in the gospel of Luke 12:2-9I’m lying awake at night worried about money but this little voice in my head keeps telling me, “God is going to see to it you’re all fine.” I remember hearing in a church once a line about God knowing the hairs on my head and how I’m greater to Him than a sparrow. Am I crazy, or is that a real verse? I think it’s Old Testament.
Again, thanks!!
Cara
In an Employment-at-will state, you can fire anyone for anyhting as long as it is not discriminatory. Most people I know do not have employment contracts unless they are unionized or seriously higher up executives. Most of us are ordinary employees, who the employer can fire at will, and who can quit at will without any legal repercussions.Unless there is some sort of** written clause in her employment** agreement that she can’t discuss corp. policy… that’s generally not a big deal. How is TRUTHFULLY talking about corp. policy defaming? It’s not like she shared a secret formula… and see in CA, where I’m from… if you don’t have a wickedly solid reason to fire a person… and that you don’t like what you heard she said… isn’t one…
With the whistleblowing I was referring to the fact that she made an HR complaint for hostile work environment then the minute there is anything that could be a gray area complaint she is subsequently fired. Yes, that could be construed as retribution for the initial HR complaint especially since her workplace became more hostile after the initial complaint.In an Employment-at-will state, you can fire anyone for anyhting as long as it is not discriminatory. Most people I know do not have employment contracts unless they are unionized or seriously higher up executives. Most of us are ordinary employees, who the employer can fire at will, and who can quit at will without any legal repercussions.
I can fire someone if I don’t like his shoes. I can’t fire him becasue I don’t like his religion, gender, nationality, etc.
California is known to be a very employee-favoring state when it comes to unemployment benefits. Other states, not as much.
But again, I agree that the OP should fight for unemployment…I just don’t think she has an employment discrimination suit based on her pregnancy.
Also, I think whistleblower protection laws would only apply if she blew the whistle on the company’s misdeeds to the appropriate authority. Not for telling your friend.