S
Sagefrakrobatik
Guest
first of all i wanted to know what to you think are going to be the key issues that are going to define his papacy and so have refered of the new pope as a “transition pope”? what do you make of this
Except for one haemoragic stroke (I’m sure I misspelled that), I think the Holy Father is in good health, esp. if you compare him to the old Holy Father at the same age (may our grand old pope rest in everlasting peace and may the Light of Christ shine upon him). I wouldn’t be surprised if this was a ten-twelve year papacy, which would make it fairly long. Transition pope? The pope’s not dead till he’s dead. I think he’ll focus on the West, on “re-Christianizing” it for all intents and purposes, and on tightening up on the liturgy.first of all i wanted to know what to you think are going to be the key issues that are going to define his papacy and so have refered of the new pope as a “transition pope”? what do you make of this
:clapping: and Christ had a “public life” of three years.the last pope we had who was called a transition pope was John 23, some transition
Rather I think that liberals hope that he will be a transitional pope. As was previously said he is in great health - just minor high blood pressure which is normal at his age. The Holy Father has given us a clue as to what his main topics will be as he has already begun to address them in word and actions.first of all i wanted to know what to you think are going to be the key issues that are going to define his papacy and so have refered of the new pope as a “transition pope”? what do you make of this
All popes are transitional. The Church is 2000 years old and there have been 265 popes. None has changed what is not supposed to be changed.
Kathie :bowdown:
No, I don’t think you’re at all off base, esp. if you’re talking about the Patriarch of Russia. AND I don’t think it’s either right or fair. No one could have done more than the old Holy Father to have the Church “breathe with both lungs.” He bent over backwards and got a real “talk to the hand” attitude from the Patriarch, esp. in regard to his desire to visit Russia. I harbor just a bit of bitterness at how our good old Pope was treated.Does anyone else find it interesting that Pope Benedict seems to have a better rapport with our Orthodox brethren than John Paul II had? I wonder why that is? If I am totally off base here, please tellme.
Well, that’s what make it so curious. I know that our beloved JPII tried so hard.No, I don’t think you’re at all off base, esp. if you’re talking about the Patriarch of Russia. AND I don’t think it’s either right or fair. No one could have done more than the old Holy Father to have the Church “breathe with both lungs.” He bent over backwards and got a real “talk to the hand” attitude from the Patriarch, esp. in regard to his desire to visit Russia. I harbor just a bit of bitterness at how our good old Pope was treated.I love and admire Pope Benedict, but I don’t know what’s different.
Exactly, lets not lose Respect for Our Holy Father. Next time Please address Him accordingly.I have nothing to add to the topic at hand, but I’m pretty sure of one thing, he would probably prefer to be called Pope Benedict XVI (as opposed to “Ratzinger”) and rightly so.
History is way overrated! Did you know, a lot of High School football coaches teach History? That should be the first piece of evidence to support my statement.IMO sour grapes goes a long way towards explaining russian orthodox hostility towards Rome. In the communist era there were two major schools of thought about how to deal with communist repression inside countries controlled by it.