I have a question about slaughter of enimals from the Christian point of view or from the Catholic point of view?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Athanasiy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Athanasiy

Guest
We eat meat , and we know that the animals are given to us for food
In some cold countries, people can not imagine life without meat or warm furs
I know in some countries people agree with idea to kill enimals without pain
by electroplexy or anesthesia
, and some people i heard in eastern countries are practicing a painful slaughter of animals
as I have heard in the Jewish religious tradition
еven using religious interpretations, even praying , and there is a theory that enimals don’t feel pain in that way.
what about Christian point of view on this?
 
Animals aren’t the same as us. It’s entirely valid to view them as a resource for human benefit. It is NOT moral to engage in deliberate cruelty for its own sake.

Thus, it is valid to shoot a deer with an arrow or a rodent with a slingshot if the purpose is to feed yourself in the former case, or eliminate damage to your home and crops in the second case, even if there is significant suffering involved for the animal in the proccess. But it is NOT valid to simply inflict pain on an animal because you find it enjoyable.
 
if you would see the process through which enimals go before they are on our table as a meat, we would think about this.
i mean the cattle for example .

is shechita practice of killing enimals banned or acceptable ?
 
if you would see the process through which enimals go before they are on our table as a meat, we would think about this.
i mean the cattle for example .

is shechita practice of killing enimals banned or acceptable ?
Perhaps you know the process, but a lot of people only think they do, but don’t.

The area in which I live is ranching country, “cow/calf” operations almost exclusively. The cattle and calves are raised on grass. They are allowed to roam pastures and drink either well water or stream water. They are regularly vaccinated for disease and treated by veterinarians when ill. Cattle are bred as they would be in the wild, by bulls that are allowed access to the herd, either all the time or in seasons. No rancher with any sense mistreats his animals because the buyers can tell it, it affects quality, and the price goes down correspondingly. Ranchers studiously avoid stressing cattle for the same reason. Stress shows in a number of ways, not the least of which is a wild or panicky nature that can get a cattleman killed in an instant.

Calves are weaned at around six months. The cow is going dry by that time anyway, and the calf has already learned how to eat grass for most of its diet. Weaning is important for the health of the cow and to avoid having two nursing calves when the cow next delivers. Cow and calf immediately forget each other’s existence after weaning. From that point, calves are “backgrounded”, usually on rich grass pasture or on wheat fields. Those destined as “grass fed” beef remain on pastures until they are about 1 1/2 to 2 years old. Those that will be grain fed go to feed lots at about 1 to 1 1/2 years old. They are fed grain (the “grain fed” ones are) for 80-120 days. When slaughtered, they are rendered unconscious electrically, then immediately bled out completely. It’s not terribly different from Kosher requirements. Some processing plants have “Kosher lines”.

That’s how it is. I am aware that in some places that really aren’t suited for raising cattle, (like Japan and some parts of California or the Northeast) they are kept indoors all the time, and so on. But that’s not the way it is in “cattle country”. Most cattle in the U.S. are raised in three states; Tx, Ok and Mo., and in those places, are raised as I described. Most “backgrounding” takes place either in the same area where the calves are born or go to wheat fields in the “wheat belt”. Feed lots are chiefly in “corn states” like Ks, Ia, Ne.

As humans, none of the above would be acceptable to us as a way of life. For animals, it’s a lot better than life in the wild. By my observation, cattle are generally treated better than most domestic pets (given the nature of both) because ranchers have a keener sense of what cattle really need and what they should not be subjected to. Many, if not most, pet owners are “amateurs” when it comes to treatment of animals. Ranchers, to be successful, must become professionals.
 
Ridgerunner , please tell me your opinion about this movie
it might be that in third world countries the farmers or at slaughterhouses the people use even more primitive way to deal meat.

youtube.com/watch?v=F4wh1pURIyM&feature=plcp
This is an extremely hard film to follow; first of all because it’s all in Russian, so you have no idea what they’re attempting to describe. Secondly, the films clips are dark, (growout and processing facilities are typically very well lighted) don’t show much and are very brief, so you don’t know what the process is, except to the extent some parts of it somewhat resemble what actually happens. There are not a lot of those snippets that are recognizable to me, though I have been in both growout and processing facilities.

What I can say about those little snippets is that those parts I was able to mentally place are not “state of the art” in the U.S. In the little “hog snippets”, they seem to be doing a lot by hand or by very poor mechanization things that are highly mechanized here. Same with the “chicken snippets”. None of what seem to be poultry growout facilities are remotely typical of poultry house conditions I have seen. There is a fair amount of abuse of the animals in some of the little film snippets. I have seen similar things “staged” by activists, but possibly they’re foreign processes. Abuse of livestock will get you fired here because it results in waste of product and citation for animal abuse.

None of the “cattle snippets” are “on the farm” except possibly one very brief snippet that seems to be in a dairy farm. One very brief bit, maybe two seconds long, seems to be of a beef feed lot. But you can’t tell anything about the operation as a whole from it. (I’ll admit I skipped forward a lot because just listening to the guy speaking Russian wasn’t something I had time for.)

On the whole, it seems like a propaganda film to me, and the impossibility of knowing what’s really going on and the dark lighting bolster that impression.

To really know what the processes are like, I suggest to people that they actually visit the farms and/or production facilities. If the proprietors know you’re not there to falsify, they’re likely to allow it. One thing a person needs to be aware of, though, is that since 911 there are industry rules about terrorism, (to protect against poisoning food, etc) that cause processors to allow less access than they once did. Farmers are usually more welcoming if you adhere to their rules designed to prevent introduction of disease in their facilities. They’ll make you clean your shoes or put on boots so you don’t accidently introduce bird diseases, for instance. In good hog facilities, you will have to completely “suit out” in throwaway coveralls because hogs are very susceptible to human diseases.
 
Humane slaughter is perfectly acceptable from a Roman Catholic Moral perspective. What exactly constitutes “humane” is not clearly defined, excepting that the goal is to minimize pain, stress and mental discomfort to the animal being slaughtered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top