A
angel12
Guest
Have you read his book?Why would one listen to someone who is spreading errors and dangerous teachings?
Have you read his book?Why would one listen to someone who is spreading errors and dangerous teachings?
So you are accusing a Catholic priest of dangerous teachings, based on no personal knowledge of those teachings.I haven’t. I’m judging based on what the OP is saying.
So what exactly has he said that makes him “dangerous.” (Specific quotes, in context.)Not just that, but other things he’s said on other occasions.
Fr. Martin is offering a false notion of mercy that says, “Go ahead and remain in your dark and destructive sinful life … God is perfectly okay with that.
So you can’t give any examples yourself. Gotcha.I’ll let Fr. Richard Heilman explain why I believe Fr. James Martin is spreading dangerous teachings:
Fr. Heilman’s comparisons are rather offensive. My partner and I met in a church (not a Catholic Church, of course) and have been together for 20 years now. I wouldn’t consider our choice to be in that relationship to be the same as a choice to “click on a porn site and engage in masturbation.” Nor is it merely an act of “self-gratification” or a desire to “indulge in…sensual pleasures.” Fr. Heilman also says that the father in the Story of the Prodigal Son doesn’t “tell the son he is free to bring the prostitutes home with him.” When I bring my partner with me to my parents’ home, I wouldn’t consider that the same as bringing a “prostitute” home with me. People in the Catholic Church might think that same-sex relationships are a “sin”, but it doesn’t help their cause when they denigrate gay people by making some of the mean-spirited, shallow and dishonest comparisons that they do.I’ll let Fr. Richard Heilman explain why I believe Fr. James Martin is spreading dangerous teachings:
Have you given any proof that you know what IS ordered, so as to rightly discern “disorder”? I have not seen that authorizing proof from you yet. Without keen awareness of what is authentic and ordered - authentic, not merely having existence, not merely subjectively attractive or desired or pleasurable - but lacking keen knowledge of true value and the righteousness of it, how can a man discern disvalue, and disorder, and moral violation?“I also posted above regarding the “disorder” of homosexuality; I am yet to see any proof it is in fact disordered.”