To start off, the main thing that pushed me away from religion was the contradictions between reality and the bible
How so?
Are you saying that you wanted to treat the Bible as if it were a science book or a history book? That would be a mistake. Although there
is history in the Bible, not everything in the Bible is historical narrative. So, if you found a “contradiction” between science or history on one hand and a non-historical narrative of the Bible on the other, then the proper conclusion is that you’re misinterpreting the Bible.
Robert Frost wrote:
“Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.”
Emily Dickenson wrote:
“Because I could not stop for Death –
He kindly stopped for me –
The Carriage held but just Ourselves –
And Immortality.”
Now, would you complain to Dickinson, “there is no such carriage! A carriage cannot hold death and immortality as passengers!”, or disparage Frost, asserting, “show me the paths! They do not exist! This is not ‘reality’!”…?
No; of course not. You would read their words as they had been intended to be read.
Or what about reading an ancient account that makes use of the understanding of science of the day in order to make a point about philosophy or love or life? Would you discount his understanding of these, just because it’s written from the perspective of science that has since been disproven?
No; of course not. You would, I’d hope, seek to understand the context of the writer, and utilize that context in order to understand what the writer was attempting to convey.
Just so, the Bible tells us stories. Some are historical, others are poetic. Some utilize allegory. All attempt to teach us how to approach salvation.
If I cannot trust the bible to give accurate information then what basis can I understand the nature and existence of god?
The Bible
does give you accurate information. Don’t expect it to be a science book, though.
