I like where Pope Benedict is heading!

  • Thread starter Thread starter excelsus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

excelsus

Guest
"When asked by a journalist if the pope wanted to see “many ordinary parishes” making provision for the Tridentine Mass, Cardinal Castrillon, a Colombian, said: “All the parishes. Not many, all the parishes, because this is a gift of God.”

catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0803186.htm
 
Keep in mind three things:
  1. This is only the Cardinal’s opinion
  2. The Pope has not explictly asked every parish in the world to celebrate the Extraordinary Form of the Mass - though there is a good chance he might, given how important this gift is to the Church
  3. The EFM won’t replace the OFM. No form of the Mass can replace another form of the Mass unless the Pope says so, and even than, a future Pope can bring back an older form of the Mass. There is no indication that the Pope will be abolishing the OFM in his pontificate.
 
The Cardinal said it but the question was if the Pope wants to see that, not if he wants to see that. It’s Pope Benedict’s opinion.

I don’t want to see anything replaced, I just want to be able to go to my home parish every week to the EFM. Other people can have the other form if they prefer, I would just like the abundant availability of both forms.
 
The Cardinal said it but the question was if the Pope wants to see that, not if he wants to see that. It’s Pope Benedict’s opinion.

I don’t want to see anything replaced, I just want to be able to go to my home parish every week to the EFM. Other people can have the other form if they prefer, I would just like the abundant availability of both forms.
You can get two other parishioners with you to request a EFM from your parish priest. It is your right to do so. And the priest can celebrate a EFM, if at least three parishioners request it, even if the bishop tells him he can’t.
 
I would be happy to see one EF at my cathedral parish. The choir already sings chant and sacred motets. I am hoping that our new pastor will be amenable. Our bishop merely “acknowledged” the Motu Proprio and sicced the now retired then diocesan chancellor who wrote a scathing editiorial about how “nobody wants this”.

I’ve waited and prayed for forty years for this. I don’t wan’t to replace the OF, I just want to have that which was taken away from me restored. I’m not the only “nobody”.
 
I would be happy to see one EF at my cathedral parish. The choir already sings chant and sacred motets. I am hoping that our new pastor will be amenable. Our bishop merely “acknowledged” the Motu Proprio and sicced the now retired then diocesan chancellor who wrote a scathing editiorial about how “nobody wants this”.

I’ve waited and prayed for forty years for this. I don’t wan’t to replace the OF, I just want to have that which was taken away from me restored. I’m not the only “nobody”.
The bishop can’t stop you from celebrating the EFM if at least three parishioners request it from a priest. The Pope has said so.
 
You can get two other parishioners with you to request a EFM from your parish priest. It is your right to do so. And the priest can celebrate a EFM, if at least three parishioners request it, even if the bishop tells him he can’t.
I just hope my priest is trained, I haven’t asked him yet. Are those priests rarities or are they somewhat common?
 
The bishop can’t stop you from celebrating the EFM if at least three parishioners request it from a priest. The Pope has said so.
Our pastor of the last twelve years was ordained in 1957. He says the TLM privately. I sang in the cathedral choir for twenty years. I offered my services as either an altar server, singing in a schola, or singing in a choir for a TLM. Within the cathedral choir alone there are more than three who grew up with the TLM.

Our bishop merely issued a one paragraph statement in which he “acknowledged” the Motu Proprio. It was followed by a scathing editiorial by the diocesan chancellor stating that “nobody wants the Latin Mass” and that we have a perfectly good indult parish with a Low Mass and that that should be enough for everyone in the diocese.

I work for state government. The bishop’s one paragraph statement followed a week later by the editorial sends chills down my spine. It is bureaucratese for “I hear you but I’m not going to do a blooming thing about it”. It is called the “chilling effect”.

Father retired last week. All of us read the bishop’s “acknowledgement” and the chancellor’s editorial. We would not put Father through it. That is the “chilling effect”.

The Holy Father has said so. Most of us would not set a beloved priest against his bishop. There is that “chilling effect”.
 
Our pastor of the last twelve years was ordained in 1957. He says the TLM privately. I sang in the cathedral choir for twenty years. I offered my services as either an altar server, singing in a schola, or singing in a choir for a TLM. Within the cathedral choir alone there are more than three who grew up with the TLM.

Our bishop merely issued a one paragraph statement in which he “acknowledged” the Motu Proprio. It was followed by a scathing editiorial by the diocesan chancellor stating that “nobody wants the Latin Mass” and that we have a perfectly good indult parish with a Low Mass and that that should be enough for everyone in the diocese.

I work for state government. The bishop’s one paragraph statement followed a week later by the editorial sends chills down my spine. It is bureaucratese for “I hear you but I’m not going to do a blooming thing about it”. It is called the “chilling effect”.

Father retired last week. All of us read the bishop’s “acknowledgement” and the chancellor’s editorial. We would not put Father through it. That is the “chilling effect”.

The Holy Father has said so. Most of us would not set a beloved priest against his bishop. There is that “chilling effect”.
I would like to see the Pope having a conversation with that bishop…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top