L
Luis_Santiago
Guest
I made a mistake. Today I proved to my friend that one of the two following things has to be true:
**Abortion is permissible under some circumstances.
A person will go to hell for believing that abortion is permissible under some circumstances.**
In other words, believe this, or go to hell. I proved this to my devout Catholic friend, who generally proves me wrong on these things. He finally settled with saying that merely holding the belief that “abortion is sometimes permissible” is enough to send a person to hell, or at least that having this belief is risky enough that it isn’t worth the chance. Essentially, it’s Pascal’s wager. Since there’s already dozens of contradicting beliefs you have to hold in order to avoid some infinitely negative risk, it’s kind of pointless to hold any of them.
It’s not that I even wanted to prove that. I just can’t have contradicting beliefs without being able to prove one side or the other wrong, especially on something this important. I was actually looking for him to prove me wrong, mind you.
Now, you’re probably going to insist that abortion is murder, killing a person, etc. Even if it is, what is the problem? If we also believe that the victims go straight to heaven, then this isn’t as big of a problem as we make it out to be. And if we believe that, being there, they are somehow incomplete persons because of it, then heaven can’t be perfect. If it is true that , then we are really concerned about the mothers’ souls, because those are the ones in danger. But, if a mother is willing to kill her unborn child, then making a law that says she can’t doesn’t change anything as far as it concerns her salvation.
Now, the real reason killing is bad is that when it happens, we fear for the safety of ourselves and those whom we are close to. But this isn’t an issue with abortion, (except maybe where fathers are concerned, but only in that situation. an unborn child is close to only one person, its mother). Let’s not kid ourselves, abortion being legal isn’t going to result in people coming after us or our fully-born children with knives.
There’s also the argument that God’s logic is incomprehensible to mere mortals, but this means that the Catholic Church is out of its league too, since history is full of theologians like St. Augustine who used vast amounts of logic and reason to shape the beliefs of the early Church. He’s still often quoted today. Of course, we don’t believe everything he wrote, just the parts we agree with.
Now, I guess you can also argue that I’m comparing myself to St. Augustine, and doing a pretty ****** job of it. But this is an ad hominem argument, if it’s an argument at all. My friend truly did exhaust everything he could throw at me.
**Abortion is permissible under some circumstances.
A person will go to hell for believing that abortion is permissible under some circumstances.**
In other words, believe this, or go to hell. I proved this to my devout Catholic friend, who generally proves me wrong on these things. He finally settled with saying that merely holding the belief that “abortion is sometimes permissible” is enough to send a person to hell, or at least that having this belief is risky enough that it isn’t worth the chance. Essentially, it’s Pascal’s wager. Since there’s already dozens of contradicting beliefs you have to hold in order to avoid some infinitely negative risk, it’s kind of pointless to hold any of them.
It’s not that I even wanted to prove that. I just can’t have contradicting beliefs without being able to prove one side or the other wrong, especially on something this important. I was actually looking for him to prove me wrong, mind you.
Now, you’re probably going to insist that abortion is murder, killing a person, etc. Even if it is, what is the problem? If we also believe that the victims go straight to heaven, then this isn’t as big of a problem as we make it out to be. And if we believe that, being there, they are somehow incomplete persons because of it, then heaven can’t be perfect. If it is true that , then we are really concerned about the mothers’ souls, because those are the ones in danger. But, if a mother is willing to kill her unborn child, then making a law that says she can’t doesn’t change anything as far as it concerns her salvation.
Now, the real reason killing is bad is that when it happens, we fear for the safety of ourselves and those whom we are close to. But this isn’t an issue with abortion, (except maybe where fathers are concerned, but only in that situation. an unborn child is close to only one person, its mother). Let’s not kid ourselves, abortion being legal isn’t going to result in people coming after us or our fully-born children with knives.
There’s also the argument that God’s logic is incomprehensible to mere mortals, but this means that the Catholic Church is out of its league too, since history is full of theologians like St. Augustine who used vast amounts of logic and reason to shape the beliefs of the early Church. He’s still often quoted today. Of course, we don’t believe everything he wrote, just the parts we agree with.
Now, I guess you can also argue that I’m comparing myself to St. Augustine, and doing a pretty ****** job of it. But this is an ad hominem argument, if it’s an argument at all. My friend truly did exhaust everything he could throw at me.