I Need Help with Poem of the Man-God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atanatar
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
FEBRUARY 26,1948 - Pope Pius XII received three religious from the Order of the Servants of Mary in a private audience. They had sent him some typewritten collections of texts from Maria Valtorta’s still-unpublished major work. The Pope recommended publishing the work “just as it is,” expressing his disapproval of a proposed foreword which sought to elucidate its nature and adding, “Whoever reads it will understand.” Filled with enthusiasm, the three religious considered setting up a publishing house, proposed that the work be put out by the Vatican Printing Office, and sought official approval. But in 1949 the Holy Office restrained them with a severe prohibition. The work was accepted by a lay publisher; Michele Pisani, who signed a contract with the writer Maria Valtorta in 1952 and published the work in four large tomes coming out between 1956 and 1959. The name of the writer, who wished to remain unknown during her lifetime, was omitted. Pius XII died in October 1958 and was succeeded by John XXIII.

DECEMBER 16,1959. A Holy Office decree condemned the four anonymous volumes of the work entitled The Poem of the God-Man and placed them on the INDEX of prohibited books. L’Osservatore Romano published the news on January 6, 1960, along with an article explaining the reasons for the condemnation (namely, verbosity and prolixity (which we think are open to divergences in opinion and should not, in any case, be subjected to ecclesiastical censure), the inappropriateness of “certain pages” which are overly explicit (whose purpose, from an objective standpoint, is to condemn sin and evil, not take delight in them), presumed historical, geographical, and other similar errors (without citing a single example), some doctrinal inaccuracies (which do not constitute heresies and are clarified in the context of the work), and, finally, the “serious act of disobedience” regarding the prohibition ten years earlier (which clearly concerned the religious who were deemed responsible for the publication).

DECEMBER 7, 1965. Pope Paul VI, who had succeeded John XXIII in 1963, suppressed the Index of prohibited books. A Vatican notification dated June 14,1966 specified that the aforementioned INDEX retained its moral value, though no longer in effect as an ecclesiastical law.

JANUARY 31 1985. A letter from Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (formerly the Holy Office) to Cardinal Ginseppe Siri, Archbishop of Genoa, specified that the condemnation of 1959 was decided upon “in order to neutralize the harm this publication may cause to the least prepared of the faithful.” It may be deduced from Cardinal Ratzinger’s letter that reading the work was not barred for all Catholics, but only for those of the “faithful” who in 1959 could be regarded as “the least prepared.”

MAY 6,1992. Archbishop Dionigi Tettamanzi, in his capacity as Secretary General of the Italian Bishops’ Conference, wrote to the publisher Emilio Pisani to request that 'in the event the volumes are reprinted, it be clearly stated at the outset that the ‘visions’ and ‘dictations’ related therein may not be considered to possess a supernatural origin, but must simply be deemed literary forms of which the author has made use to narrate the life of Jesus in her own way." It may be deduced from Archbishop Tettamanzi’s letter that the work does not contain errors, is not censurable, and may thus be reprinted just as it is, and that reading it is not harmful even for the least prepared of the faithful. Catholic readers may not, however, affirm it to be of supernatural origin.

JUNE 30,1992. The publisher Emilio Pisani, on his first visit to the offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the Vatican, learned that Archbishop Tettamanzi’s letter had been requested by the Congregation as a result of the decision to allow all Catholics to read Maria Valtorta’s work on the same terms as any other worthwhile publications.
 
The Holy Office does NOT teach with the authority of the Pope, except for the time when it became the Pontifical Biblical Commission. Thus it can and does make serious errors.

To give you an example, it erred when it declared that Padre Pio’s charismas and stigmata, etc. were bogus, i.e. fruit of sickness and fantasy (1920-22). It erred when it declared that the charismas of Sr. Faustina Kowalska were bogus; that Polish nun who was recently beatified. Thus, the Holy Office can err. If we were living at that time, would we have to obey? Of course. But, had everyone had believed the decisions of the Holy Office to be infallible Church teachings then Padre Pio and Sr. Faustina would never have become saints. According to some writers on this board, the Holy Office is infallible. The errors it ascribed to Padre Pio and Sr. Faustina were much more serious than it ascribed to the Poem of the Man-God. The only serious error was that it was published without permission. Thus, the only serious moral force that remains is that it was published without permission.

I repeat.
The Holy Office never found any heresies in the Poem of the Man-God. The most serious reason it was placed on the index was because it was published without permission.
Code:
   There are too many holy and orthodox Catholics who praise the Poem of the Man-God **because it is so faithful to Catholic Church teachings**.   To just reject it because the non-infallible Holy Office had doubts and the only serious error it could find was that it was published without permission seems a bit foolish.
I repeat my question again. No one has answered. The introductions to Gospels of the New American Bible, especially the introduction to the Gospel of John, in which John is denied to be the author of this Gospel teach heresy. They go against the specific and clear teachings of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, which Pope Pius X in two clear explicit letters make it obligatory that all Catholics, including theologians and scripture scholars obey. These introductions disobey the teachings of Pope Pius XII in Proventissimus Deus in which he explicitly says that authorship of the books of the bible must be determined primarily by the witness of history and NOT by internal evidence. This is how all authorship of all books of the world are determined.
These introductions contradict Vatican II, Dei Verbum, which says the Gospels were written by apostles and apostolic men.

Why are these serious and widespread errors, which are read by almost all English speaking Catholics allowed to stand? Why are those who condemn the Poem of the Man God, despite the fact they can find no heresies, so silent when it comes to the blatant heretical introductions of the Gospels of the New American Bible?

I predict no one has an answer. They are all silent.

Hypocrites.
 
dcdurel your postings are full of errors in Church discipline and history - perhaps that is why they are not being responded to at this time. I would like to see the cource of the dated quotations of the second to last post.

The fact is that it is not relavent that the Holy Office did not teach with the authority of the Holy Father. The law of the Church is that we are bound to belive all things posited by belief by the Church and follow the legal proscripts of the Church until they are lifted by the competant authority. Thus far no competant authority has seen fit to give an approval or at least remove the restriction on the Poem of the Man-God. Therefore, untill the Holy See lifts its ban the moral force of the issue is absolute. Further, just to help fix a minor but important historical error in one of your postings the Holy Office did not become the PBC but its powers and authority was merged with the CDF.
 
40.png
mosher:
dcdurel your postings are full of errors in Church discipline and history - perhaps that is why they are not being responded to at this time. I would like to see the cource of the dated quotations of the second to last post.
.
Name one error. On March 6, 1959
Holy Office issued a notification banning the spread of Divine Mercy devotion. It took 19 years before they reversed their error.
This is a well known fact. Look it up. It made a big mistake.

May 31, 1923: First decree of the Holy Office against Padre Pio.
June 1923: Impressive popular demonstrations in defense of Padre Pio.
July 24, 1924: Second decree of the Holy Office against Padre Pio.
Jan. 1925: Padre Pio builds the little hospital of St. Francis at San Giovanni Rotundo.
April 23, 1926: Third decree of the Holy Office against Padre Pio.
July 31, 1926: Fourth decree of the Holy Office against Padre Pio.
May 22, 1933: Fifth decree of the Holy Office against Padre Pio.

That bad Padre Pio must be some evil person.

You wrote:

“We are bound to believe all things posited by the Church”

Since when does the Holy Office teach for the Church? The Holy Office has NO TEACHING AUTHORITY, zero, zilch, nothing… We are only bound to obey their decisions, not believe them.

Then you wrote:

“Thus far no competant authority has seen fit to give an approval or at least remove the restriction on the Poem of the Man-God.”

They can’t remove the restrictions, because there ARE NO RESTRICTIONS TO REMOVE. The index is gone. It is no more. It is impossible to remove what isn’t there.

Then you wrote “Therefore, until the Holy See lifts its ban the moral force of the issue is absolute.”
There is no moral force to the index, because the ONLY serious charge was that it was published without permission.
No permission is needed today.

They found NO heresies.

We have tons of heretical material coming out of Catholic colleges today, and the “competant” authorities seem happy with that heretical material. Even “Catholic Update” that so many parishes get from St. Anthony Messenger press are heretical. I pointed out to a new pastor recently the many errors, especially errors in which this bulletin called the presence of Jesus in the people, the readings, and in the priest “unique” presences. I said that’s heretical. There is only ONE unique presence of Jesus, and that in Jesus in the Eucharist. He no longer subscibes to the bulletin.
 
I repeat my question again. No one has answered. The introductions to Gospels of the New American Bible, especially the introduction to the Gospel of John, in which John is denied to be the author of this Gospel, teach heresy. They go against the specific and clear teachings of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, which Pope Pius X in two clear explicit letters make it obligatory that all Catholics, including theologians and scripture scholars obey. These introductions disobey the teachings of Pope Pius XII in Proventissimus Deus in which he explicitly says that authorship of the books of the bible must be determined primarily by the witness of history and NOT by internal evidence. This is how all authorship of all books of the world are determined.
These introductions contradict Vatican II, Dei Verbum, which says the Gospels were written by apostles and apostolic men.

Why are these serious and widespread errors, which are read by almost all English speaking Catholics allowed to stand?

I know one Catholic lady who no longer reads the Gospel of John and the his first two letters, because the New American Bible says they were not written by him, and she believes these introductions because the Catholic bishops let these errors stand. Thus, she only reads the third letter of John. These heresies do have an effect on Catholics. They are NOT harmless.

Why are those who condemn the Poem of the Man God, despite the fact they can find no heresies, so silent when it comes to the blatant heretical introductions of the Gospels of the New American Bible?

Again, I predict no one has an answer. They are all silent.
 
Did you know that Jesus performed the multiplication of the loaves & fish on two different occasions? I didn’t till I read about it in “The Peom of the Man-God” by Maria Valtorta. This was confirmed when I read The Scriptures more closely. BTW I stopped reading these volumes when I became aware that they were banned. I did however learn something new from them.:hmmm:
 
Reading the Poem of the Man-God has been such a blessing to me. I believe it is all true.

They are a mystic’s detailed description of her visions where Jesus repeatedly brings her right into the scenes of His life.

I discovered these amazing books shortly after I witnessed to a friend in my old Baptist Church.

I was telling her - in answer to a Q of hers which I could not answer outright - that I no longer readily knew the differences between Catholic and Protestant like I once did.

I said, "Before, I was standing in the doorway of the Catholic Church, looking inside, saying, “Wow! Look at all those treasures!” Then, in the doorway, it was easier to look in and out, and tell all about what the differences were.

“But now”, I told her, “I am standing inside, rooting thru all these treasures. And its so overwelmingly amazing I forget sometimes what it was like to be standing in the doorway.”

I did assure my friend I would look up the answer to her Q., and I did. It can be so awkward talking to someone who is sure you have gone a little batty converting to Catholic and may be just humoring you letting you talk about it. But I was able to forget the discomfort of the situation when I shared the above and I truly felt Gods blessing and grace when I said it. I also felt she might really remember that part of the converesation.

Shortly after that I discovered Poem of the Man-God. I started reading where the angels appearing to the shepherds and then going to the nativity. I felt so overwhlemed with God’s presence as I read. It seemed to me that God handed me the book, to bless me for my boldness in the witness, as if He were saying, “Do you like My Church’s treasures? Here is one you will enjoy.”

You may argue its not of the Church, but it is not forbidden now. Nor is Padre Pio, who also was once forbidden. (who also spoke well of this book apparently: members.aol.com/fmrega4/Valtorta.htm
And Valtorta ws a thoroughly Catholic mystic.

Do you NEED Valtorta? No. All we NEED is the basics. Valtorta is just an extra treasure.

Scholars can twist anything. Look at how they twist the Bible. Look at how the Pharisees twisted everything Jesus said. Maybe the Church does not want to be in charge of fielding the many arguemnts that can be made of this.

I know Mitch Pacwa is a critic, but he is not infallible. He is great - you can’t go wrong doing everything Pacwa says! But you will miss the blessing of this beautiful book.

The criticisms found in an above link look ridiculous if you read the book. Jesus is affectionate with his apostles and everyone - but all the people of that day were more like that. If you read the books, you will find the accusation that he is gay to be ridiculous! Nothing in the book sounds racey in its context. No more than the Bible.

Also, Valtorta tells what she sees. She said “looked like” screwdrivers. Since she doesn’t do woodwork, a pointed chisel, for example, could look like that to her.

One critic above said Eve had sex with the serpent? Thats not in the book. The lesson about Eve is complicated, and it has something to do with lustful thoughts - which would be obvious if she now saw good and evil both.

There was a mention (in the critics linked above) of Jesus saying, “Peter! Peter! You big, old, baby!” If you had read the story with that in context, that comment would so warm your heart. Jesus’ answer was perfect love.

It is all about perfect love. If you get a chance to read one, I think its fair to read it with an open mind - thinking, this COULD be true. And asking Jesus to show you if it is. Withhold your judgment. If I had not done that when I looked at Catholicism, I never would have been Catholic.

If you read the book like that, you will certainly enjoy it. There is no better read! Well - the gospels. But this expands the gospels. It is not new revelation - just an expansion (as the Church expands on the truths handed down, without adding to them, even though they say more). You get to see the apostles - what they look and act like! And Mary! And Jesus! and the people, and their response to His miracles! You will fall in love. And you can learn what the Holy Land was like in Jesus’ time - the weather, the terrain, the towns, how people lived. And the people! Their encounters with Jesus and you see thier hearts change. The books are a tapistry, a tapistry of love, of the greatest love story ever told.
 
The Poem of the Man-God has marvelous insights.

For example. Everyone has trouble with Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. Some versions of the bible even left it off because they though Jesus was too lenient.

I have heard all kinds of conclusions about His actions.
But the Poem of the Man-God cleared them all up.

In it Jesus says that He did not condemn the woman caught in adultery. But He did not forgive her either, because she did not repent.

Marvelous, so simple, yet no one in history throught of that answer.
 
Come on guys!

If you are not going to respond to “**dcdurel” **and his claims I going back to my volumes by Maria Valtorta … Is it God’s wish?
 
40.png
gap51:
Come on guys!

If you are not going to respond to “**dcdurel” **and his claims I going back to my volumes by Maria Valtorta … Is it God’s wish?
I think there is no response. Those are the facts. Some people don’t want to look into it further. Its their loss. Some people are just going to be spooked by the old “fobidden list”. Some aren’t going to want to question valid Catholic authorities who are also good shepherds, like Pacwa. That choice is not going to compromise their faith or their salvation. They will miss out on the blessing of reading a great treasure. But God has provided His Church with many treasures. There will be something out there just for them, if they want.
 
40.png
dcdurel:
The Poem of the Man-God has marvelous insights.

For example. Everyone has trouble with Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. Some versions of the bible even left it off because they though Jesus was too lenient…
…Marvelous, so simple, yet no one in history throught of that answer.
Yes! There are so many marvelous, simple, true things! It is just packed.

When I first started reading, I wasn’t reading in order. I was looking about volume 1, hoping to find more and more on Judas Thadeus, to whom I was praying a novena. But I kept running into Judas Iscariet, of whom there is much more written. I didn’t want to read about him! But since he had so much space, I started to read.

The stories of the Iscariot have taught me so much! We have Iscariots in our lives. I have a big one! How do you deal with them? Well see how Jesus deals with Judas. He loves him. Prays for him. He doesn’t let anyone speak ill of him, even when it would be obvious to. Perhaps we already know this. But seeing Jesus actually do this in the most trying of circumstances really instructs.

Mary Madlene’s story, woven thruout, is so beautiful. What a lesson for today, when we see people so lost in worldliness. Mary was completely lost, and seemingly happy to be so, but she repented, thoroughly, and was saved - and with what ferverent prayers! - and how so!

And the characters! Who could make these up? The shepherds! Gamaliel! Dear John of Endor! Syntyche! Judas’s mother! How Jesus lifter up the lowly and trampled-upon, like her, and took care of them perfectly, with simplicity - just the right words or actions. And Porpheiria, Peter’s wife, how kind Jesus words to her were when He came to get Marjiam. And Marjiam! Wasn’t he the boy who siad to Judas, “You are bad,” and that he looked like a prince on the outside but like Satan on the inside. Out of the mouths of babes.

There are so many surprising beautiful stories. One of my favorites is in volume one where Andrew comes to get Jesus to help in an “urgent matter of heart,” and he doesnt say what, but Jesus comes immediately, and Peter chides his shy brother saying he is like a blushing bride or something, and he comes along becasue he is curious, even though Andrew asked him not to. And it is a couple where the husband is going to put away the wife because she can’t have children. The wife is howling, the neighbors are clustered around their house, the husband is stubborn - he loves his wife but the pharisees have advised him this is the thing to do. Jesus’ words to them are perfect, and the husband repents and reclaims the good wife he lovees, and they praise God, and Jsus blesses them, and then he promises them a son by next harvest.

Who could make these stories up? The are the story of the God-man with the perfect Heart, Who reads hearts, has a mission He never wavers from, and acts in simple economizing perfection.
 
40.png
dcdurel:
Why are those who condemn the Poem of the Man God, despite the fact they can find no heresies, so silent when it comes to the blatant heretical introductions of the Gospels of the New American Bible?

Again, I predict no one has an answer. They are all silent.
I suspect the reason no one has wasted their time on this thread trying to answer your critique of the New American Bible commentary is because the issue has nothing to do with the Poem of the Man-God.

It looks to me like you’re just trying to change the subject in the face of overwhelming criticism by reputable sources on Valtorta’s work. As one of her many unapologetic critics I, myself, also have issues with the NAB commentary, but at least the commentary and its authors don’t proclaim them to be divine revelation. The NAB commentary does not rise to the level of “heresy” as you erroneously expressed since the commentators, unlike Valtorta, make no claim whatsoever that their comments are inspired. I take their writings for what they claim them to be: academic theories on how the bible books came into current form that do nothing to detract from the authority and inerrency of the Word of God.

I also place much stock in what Pontifical Bible Commission has to say on the bible and modern commentary as well given that this commission is a legitimate and credible authority on how to approach the bible. In contrast, legitimate Church authorities have condemned the work of Valtorte. Therefore, it’s not worth my time and limited devotional capabilities to read and take it seriously. I’d rather spend the time with proven tools of devotion, namely the bible and Catechism, which I would hardly characterize – as Eliza10 did – as “basic.”

To place any faith whatsoever in Valtorte’s work would be inconsistent with the counsel of reputable authorities to include, I might add, our current pope. We critics are only being consistent here in defering to legitimate Church authorities judgement on which “revelations” we should dedicate our devotional lives to.

Mike
 
40.png
trustmc:
…I. I’d rather spend the time with proven tools of devotion, namely the bible and Catechism, which I would hardly characterize – as Eliza10 did – as “basic.”

Mike
What I meant was, basic, like foundational. Like not extras. I wonder what in the world you were thinking I meant by the word??

You also said: “To place any faith whatsoever in Valtorte’s work would be inconsistent with the counsel of reputable authorities to include, I might add, our current pope.”

To place faith in Valtorta’s work is also to be consistent with reputable authorites. See, you are choosing to ignore there are reputable authorities on BOTH sids of this issue.

So go ahead, and choose your side, and base your devotional life on what the Church teaches (She allows belief in private revelation) and where the Holy Spirit guides your conscience. But don’t be smug about it. Have considerations for differences of opinion, for which there is room.

Also, our Pope has made no comment on Valtorta in his office as Pope. When he does speak from his position of infallibility on faith and morals, of course we Catholics listen!
 
I will take the opinions of Mother Theresa, Padre Pio, and Pope John Paul the Great over Mitch Pacwa any day.

They all read this book with great devotion, though it will never really be publicized because there are some elements in the Church who are being deceived about it. 😦
 
Character Zero:
I will take the opinions of Mother Theresa, Padre Pio, and Pope John Paul the Great over Mitch Pacwa any day.

They all read this book with great devotion, though it will never really be publicized because there are some elements in the Church who are being deceived about it. 😦
I didn’t know about Pope John Paul the Great and Mother Theresa reading it, too! It doesn’t surprise me since it is a treasure for our time. There is so much evil in our time. God compensates with such treasures.
 
40.png
Eliza10:
I didn’t know about Pope John Paul the Great and Mother Theresa reading it, too! It doesn’t surprise me since it is a treasure for our time. There is so much evil in our time. God compensates with such treasures.
My uncle is a priest, he used to live at the Vatican, and he was good friends with a lot of the cardinals. His bishop, Bishop Hnilica, was friends with Pope John Paul the Great, and that is how my uncle found this out.
So, I suppose you could say it is purely anecdotal, and I don’t expect opponents of the book to believe me, but I know that it is true.
Anyway, yes, it does not surprise me one bit that they would be devoted to these books.
 
40.png
Eliza10:
Also, our Pope has made no comment on Valtorta in his office as Pope. When he does speak from his position of infallibility on faith and morals, of course we Catholics listen!
Yet another example of a Valtorta supporter splitting hairs to justify their disagreement with Church authorities. Thanks for making my earlier point. Since Pope Benedict XVI hasn’t renounced any of his earlier decisions and statements, we are morally bound then to take heed of everything he’s said and done as an Apostle and not discount or dismiss any of them.

Many book stores are currently featuring books written by then-Carl Ratzinger that wouldn’t be worth the read according to your logic since he was only a bishop at the time he wrote them. In fact, I guess everything Pope Benedict XVI wrote and said up until he became pope aren’t worth a hill of beans then. It’s a wonder he was ever elected pope!

Mike
 
I must confess that I honestly don’t see the purpose of any private revelations. Given the vast amount of thoroughly solid theological and spiritual works from the saints and doctors of the Church, who would have time to read through the speculative garbage that fanatical (possibly mentally ill) visionaries produce? One could spend one’s whole life just reading Scripture, St. Augustine, St. John Chrysostom, St. Thomas Aquinas, and the like. Why not just read St. Francis de Sales or something practical? All that we need to know has been publicly revealed and it consists of this:

1.) Attend Mass regularly and (when in a state of grace) receive the Eucharist.
2.) Confess one’s sins regularly, fast, and do penance.
3.) Read Scripture and the great doctors and fathers of the church
4.) practice virtue, especially works of mercy and cultivate humility.
5.) pray, pray, and pray.
6.) Fulfill all one’s daily duties in one’s station in life.
7.) Obey all Church teaching.

What else do we need?
 
Oh good Lord help us and have mercy on us! I did some searching got some info on this poem of the Man God. Its all gnostic heretical nonsense. I would even call it Satanic. Jesus is portrayed as a homosexual who shares physical intimacy with the apostles (kisses and caresses). Mary is called the second born of God. It also seems to suggest that Eve had sex with the snake in the garden and that this was original sin. I was reading some other “revelations” to this crazy woman and she has Jesus telling her that no one understands the truth like she does and that she is part of a spiritual elite. Clearly, its all pagan, gnostic rubbish and will lead souls into the fires of hell. Anathema Sit!
 
The arguments against it derive from a campaign against it led by Joseph Cardinal Siri, Archbishop of Genoa, who thought it made Our Lord seem too human. It is true that you see His sacred humanity quite clearly but you are also overwhelmed by His awesome divinity. The story has three phases.

First, the Poem was brought to Pope Pius XII who read it in its entirety and said: “Publish this work as it is. There is no need to give an opinion on its origin, if it be extraordinary or not. Whoever reads it will understand.” Thereafter, it was published throught Italy and other countries in various forms e.g. 14 thinner volumes in Italian in excerpts in magazines and Catholic newspapers, etc. This publication was very popular in Italy (and elsewhere) with clergy and laity. The fact that they were published in Italy with the *papal imprimatur *is quite exceptional.

The second phase began when two priests, who later, in retirement, admitted that they were modernists, asked Blessed Pope John to put it on the Index 'til the Holy Office (now the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Pope Benedict’s old bailiwick) could review it. Their problem, and the problem of many modernists, was that it portrayed Our Lord as clearly Divine, which is not acceptable to modernists.

When Pope Paul abolished The Index, it was still “under review”; so there was never an opportunity for it to be taken off The Index, as many books were -which icluded writings of Thomas Aquinas and John of the Cross. Publishers started publishing it again and started publishing more books which derive from it. Its resurgence in popularity bothered Cardinal Siri’s coterie and Siri decided to play a shrewd gambit. He asked Card. Ratzinger whether or not the old principle that one should be cautious about reading books that had been on the Index but had been taken off. Cardinal Ratzinger replied that in most cases, the cautionary practice should still apply, implying that this would be good for pastors dealing with individuals who were “less-well prepared”, i.e. the uneducated or imbalanced.

Siri published this response in his archdiocesan newpaper and the campaign against it resumed. Fr. Mitch Pacwa spoke and wrote against it on EWTN. He dislikes it, doesn’t recommend it and is quite honest about it. I love Fr. Mitch but I disagree with him.

Anyone who reads The Poem can see that it is of supernatural origin, either diabolical or divine. One critic, a French scientist, actually started to write a book to disprove it by using his astronomical computations as contrasted with the considerable number of observations reported by Valtorta. It turned out that her observations were invariably correct. Valtorta also gave place names of many of the towns and villages where Our Lord stopped with his apostles which were unkown to any experts when she died but which have subsequently been excavated exactly where Valtorta said they were. (This book, by Jean Aulagnier, is called The Diary of Jesus, a Day by Day Account of the Life of Jesus based on the writings of Maria Valtorta. It is published by Kolbe Publications.)

Fr. Gabriele Roschini, the greatest Mariologist of the 20th century, reviewed The Poem for its treatment of Mary, and became a believer and promoter of Valtorta. His approbation was very influential at the Holy See and throughout traditional circles in Europe.

Once, when Padre Pio was asked by one of his spiritual daughters for permission to read Valtorta, which had been highly recommended to her, he said "I do not permit you; I command you to read Valtorta."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top