H
Hound_Dog
Guest
So you don’t go by what the Church leaders say? Why is that?umm i dont get it, why is people showing there love for God a problem for you? its not like there interrupting the Mass![]()
So you don’t go by what the Church leaders say? Why is that?umm i dont get it, why is people showing there love for God a problem for you? its not like there interrupting the Mass![]()
How many novelties does it take to transform the Catholic Church into a Protestant one? A dozen? Six? Two or three? Just one?This is the Catholic Church not any protestant denomination where there are novelties.
I have nothing to do with snake handling of any kind and certainly not as a religious practice.
WEll I don’t know anyone who is “snakehandling” as part of religious practice, as you call it… I only know one, namely the apostle Paul when he came to… where was it, Malta… he dealt with a snake which he shook off, like Jesus promised that the believers will be able to. Anyway, fact is, the way you spoke to me was so rude that I referred to dialoging with you as “snakehandling”, you being the snake…
You never did answer me. Are you a convert?
Yep, and I’m a happy one. But after what I’ve seen on this thread, I don’t think I’m gonna join your group. I’ve heard the traditionalists are legalistic and concerned with lesser things much more than with essentisal things… and well, you seem like a grumpy old person, alright.
When I envision Jesus in the Temple, I see a Man who uses his body to worship… like David did, and like the Jews do today. Do you know that the Jews today who believe in Jesus use their millenia-old custom of dancing in church?
You quoted something from the bible about raising of hands but the Bishops say differently. Does your quote apply to what goes on in the Mass? No. It doesn’t.
Well, give me a binding document quote where it states I am not allowed as a lay person to lift my hands a bit in receiving gesture when praying in Church, and I will obey, although I would not understand what is the fuss. until now I have never ever seen such a document… So its up to you to provide it here.
I’ll listen to the Bishops and I suggest you listen to the teachings of the Church instead of using your own interpretation.
Until now on this thread I have only seen the subjective rantings of a bitter person who would probably have died of shock if he had been present on the day of Pentecost. Yes, I said Pentecost again… I hope you don’t mind. It is after all a Catholic word.
No, if anything it would be an opportunity to set a good example by following the true and traditional practices of the Church. But if it gets to the point where it is so distracting and unsettling that an individual cannot concentrate on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, then it might be time to look for a new parish. Not everyone will get to this point - I’m sure some can just ignore it and keep attending without any harm done.Are we called to stop attending Mass because of novelties? Should we abandon parishes when parishoners hold hands during the OF?
umm i am(was) unaware that Church leaders forbidden it,So you don’t go by what the Church leaders say? Why is that?
Well said, Matt!We don’t just avoid certain things because they might invalidate the Mass or cause some other grave consequence. Riding your bike up the line to Communion wouldn’t invalidate the Mass, but it would be absurd to try it.
The point is that this gesture is one reserved for the clergy and it is a complete novelty on the part of the faithful to be doing it at that or any other point in the Mass.
Im sure we can all be distracted or feel uncomfortable about many tiny things that our brothers and sisters do, if we allow ourselves to go that way.Well said, Matt!
My main issue with the upraised/holding hands is that it can be a distraction to those who don’t do it, and can even make some uncomfortable if they don’t wish to participate (especially in parishes where everyone is encouraged to do it). Personally, I just close my eyes when I pray the Pater Noster, but for others, I can see how it could be an issue.
So do I… however, a few of them seems to be too upset about these minor things compared to everything else… some even get angry during mass and want to leave. Is that really good? I dont think that is holy zeal anymore…GraceDk, your last post reads as a false dichotomy.
I know various persons concerned with the crisis in its entirely, from lack of orthodoxy, orthopraxis, morals, the things you mentioned, etc.
Blessings!
![]()
There’s a lot of stuff to respond to in this post, but I’ll point out just a couple things. First, I think it’s a misconception to think that churches that want reverent liturgies with few distractions aren’t also the ones preaching against sin, contraception, pornography, etc. I’d argue they do MORE of this kind of preaching, at least in my personal experience. Second, there is nothing Pharisee-like about wanting a solemn, reverent Mass where everyone can worship without distraction (of course, you’ll never get rid of ALL distractions, but it can at least be kept at a minimum). If the Church allowed parishioners to do whatever they wanted during the liturgy, there would be chaos.Im sure we can all be distracted or feel uncomfortable about many tiny things that our brothers and sisters do, if we allow ourselves to go that way.
There are people who care endlessly about minor details like these while there are major issues around us - eg. a big group of unevangelised youth in almost every church, or the fact that some people go in and out of our churches being sick while no one ever dares to lay hands on them and pray for healing, or there are those who live in continuous sin by contracepting or watching porn etc, and many priests don’t ever wanna talk about sin and hell in their sermons, or when there is no fellowship and many feel isolated and alone in our churches.
There is a kind of people that fuss about someone’s dedicated gesture in church, but who seems to not care about any of these much more pressing issues.
It sounds like pharisaism… this fussing over small things, making a legalistic system out of every human activity, even sometimes exaggerating so much that there is little resemblance to the Gospels or the Catholic Church anymore.
The Scribes and Pharisees were anti-heroes because they had lost themselves in every little detail, caring not for the heart of man or the essential things. They even made extra laws to put as burdens on the converts they won.
But thank God we are free from that in Christ Jesus.
There’s a lot of stuff to respond to in this post, but I’ll point out just a couple things. First, I think it’s a misconception to think that churches that want reverent liturgies with few distractions aren’t also the ones preaching against sin, contraception, pornography, etc. I’d argue they do MORE of this kind of preaching, at least in my personal experience. Second, there is nothing Pharisee-like about wanting a solemn, reverent Mass where everyone can worship without distraction (of course, you’ll never get rid of ALL distractions, but it can at least be kept at a minimum). If the Church allowed parishioners to do whatever they wanted during the liturgy, there would be chaos.
True, in some cases… I also believe in reverent masses. I dont like liturgical abuse. Last year I visited a church where I couldn’t even recignize the mass, and I didnt receive Communion because I didn’t know if it was valid or not.
As for the upraised/holding hands during the Our Father, I see this as a minor distraction, but one that is not in the rubrics and is not the liturgical norm (and, as pointed out already, reserved for the priest). I’m not out to condemn anyone that wishes to do so, but like I said, it could be considered a distraction to some.
**But there are also people who get distracted when people kneel at communion. Like, I once even had a priest who was angry on me for kneeling during and after communion. It irritated him. But I knew my rights. Some people have their own ideas. Some people think its holier than thou to wear a scarf during mass, so they are distracted because of the personal piety of one lady. Should she stop wearing the scarf? No, you would say. I dont see the difference if someone discreetly lifts their hands and faces moderately towards God… an inward expression which comes out in gesture, often even unconsciously done.
Everything we do, wear and say is bound to irritate someone somewhere.
The point is, the OP has of yet failed to give any binding document that states that one should not pray like that… what he gave was a generel guideline from a single parish somewhere in the States… It doesn’t rise to the level of disciplin for anyone outside that diocese, as far as I can see, if it even does that. Its only guidelines, good advice, but if he wished to raise it to doctrinal binding level on all faithful he might as well join Judaism. **
The chalice-sniffers will send back that wine.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=PxxTG9Wo2-Y
This clip is from an African mass… I guess the OP will faint when he sees this. These people are celebrating a Catholic mass. I suppose they are in deep trouble…![]()
I understand how this bothers you. I don’t like it either. I generally close my eyes at that time. I have found some parishes have this more than others. As someone else said you could try to find a parish where it is the exception rather than the norm. It seems like you are talking about the little swoop of hands that happened when we say, “and with your spirit.” more than during the Our Father but I dislike both.Here, from a parish website, is the answer.
mqop.com/posturesandprocedures.html
There is much more on the link but the upraised hands thing gets to me. In my own Church people are doing it when the Priest says “peace be with you” and they reply with upraised hands “and with your spirit”
It is starting to have a pentecostal feeling to the masses.
There are times when people say things about other people, such as what you have heard about traditionalists and right away we believe them, but it really is better to not make such a quick judgement regarding someone based on rumors you have heard.Yep, and I’m a happy one. But after what I’ve seen on this thread, I don’t think I’m gonna join your group. I’ve heard the traditionalists are legalistic and concerned with lesser things much more than with essentisal things… and well, you seem like a grumpy old person, alright.
When I envision Jesus in the Temple, I see a Man who uses his body to worship… like David did, and like the Jews do today. Do you know that the Jews today who believe in Jesus use their millenia-old custom of dancing in church?
I think if I was there at Pentecost I would have been in a pretty good state of awe; strong winds, tongues of fire, different languages, strong preaching.Until now on this thread I have only seen the subjective rantings of a bitter person who would probably have died of shock if he had been present on the day of Pentecost. Yes, I said Pentecost again… I hope you don’t mind. It is after all a Catholic word.
I don’t know if they would be in deep trouble, but they should be sure to be obeying the rubrics of the mass and then they wouldn’t have to worry about being in trouble at all.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=PxxTG9Wo2-Y
This clip is from an African mass… I guess the OP will faint when he sees this. These people are celebrating a Catholic mass. I suppose they are in deep trouble…![]()

How many novelties does it take to transform the Catholic Church into a Protestant one? A dozen? Six? Two or three? Just one?
Recall that the Stations of the Cross were once a novelity in Catholic Churches.