D
didymus
Guest
I heard about this controversy on NPR the other day. A Mislim witness in a North Carolina sate court asked to be swron in on a Korean rather than the Bible and was told the court didn’t have one. A local Islamic organisation tried to donate Korans but was told that under a 1777 law witnesses swear on “the Holy Scriptures” (with the option of “affirming” instead).
The ACLU has offered its help to the Muslims but they refused for fear the ACLU would use the case for its won anti-religious puroses (no fools they!).
Here’s a link to the original story:
news-record.com/news/local/quran_061905_online.htm
and a follow-up:
news-record.com/news/local/gso/quranreax_062205.htm
Personally, I wouldn’y have a problem with offering Muslims a Koran to take the oath, or a Torah for Jews, or a Douay Bible for Catholics (you know that in NC "Holy Scriptures means KJV). But the constitutional lawyer they interviewd on NPR pointed out this could open the door for prople bringing any book at all and claiming it is their holy book (Dianetics for Tom Cruise, e. g.).
The ACLU has offered its help to the Muslims but they refused for fear the ACLU would use the case for its won anti-religious puroses (no fools they!).
Here’s a link to the original story:
news-record.com/news/local/quran_061905_online.htm
and a follow-up:
news-record.com/news/local/gso/quranreax_062205.htm
Personally, I wouldn’y have a problem with offering Muslims a Koran to take the oath, or a Torah for Jews, or a Douay Bible for Catholics (you know that in NC "Holy Scriptures means KJV). But the constitutional lawyer they interviewd on NPR pointed out this could open the door for prople bringing any book at all and claiming it is their holy book (Dianetics for Tom Cruise, e. g.).